knightly

joined 2 years ago
[–] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Zohran Mamdani won the NYC primary, so it sure sounds like the voters are paying attention.

Whether or not the party wants to listen is their perogative, so long as they claim to represent us they can rise or fall on the strength of their promises to us and our faith in their willingness to make good on those promises.

"Nothing will fundamentally change" sure isn't working as well as Obama's "hope and change", is it?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Are you today's explanation?

Are you today's right-winger cosplaying as a lib?

Every time the Dems lose, they go to the center to find voters.

The center is to the left of where the party was 10 years ago. If the party actually acted like you suggest they are then they wouldn't have lost to an 80's villain twice.

If you want them to go left, you have to give them wins first.

Why would they go left if the plan to find a middle ground with Republicans was working?

Right now every time they go left, they lose.

Zohran Mamdani.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez.

Bernie Sanders.

Every time they've gone left they've won, every time they reject the left they lose.

Hell, even that neoliberal Obama who never kept his campaign promises still at least promised us hope and change and won twice, but now the Democrats can only promise that nothing will change. I guess we can credit them with being honest?

Biden gave green energy and build back better. The reward? Lose the house. Harris was going to pretty much continue. What was the answer?

The answer is that Biden never went left. "Green energy" is a neoliberal plan to replace fossil fuel subsidies with rare earth subsidies while changing nothing about their extraction, manufacturing, or distribution processes and "Build Back Better" never passed.

A continuation of nothing is still nothing.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago (6 children)

I wish I had that much power, then I'd simply demand that the Democrats run good candidates that people would vote for.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 7 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Blaming voters for your candidates' failure sure is a good way to get more voters, isn't it?

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 1 week ago (15 children)

You are why the Democrats feel safe to run shitty candidates.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 1 week ago

Typical furry discord. XD

[–] knightly@pawb.social 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Not a 60% success rate, but a 60% rate of throwing good money after bad.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's creepy-chan. I went to highschool with her, and she's always had that vibe, even back then.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 1 points 2 weeks ago

Somali food is so good, though.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

It also makes those large corporate platforms unappealing, which is a very good thing for those of us who have always said that federation is a half-step towards proper decentralization.

[–] knightly@pawb.social 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
 
 
 

Specifically, ones that aren't chock-full of mobile game enshittification and in-app purchases?

I don't mind paying for games but I'm sick and tired of predatory monetization schemes and will immediately uninstall a game if the tutorial insists on showing me a store page.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›