this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
435 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6945 readers
475 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 116 points 2 weeks ago (59 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe they think the flooding won’t affect them on their moral high ground.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

They'll never claim an ounce of the responsibility they deserve, the fucking scumbags

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Ha ha but You voted for Genocide!

/s

[–] grue@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

So did the protest non-voters, even moreso than the Democrat ones.

The non-genocide position was literally impossible to express no matter what you tried to do.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

No it existed. Harris is on record saying she'd like to work towards peace talks.

Which is objectively better than option B: vote GOP "finish them off" and option C: literally doing nothing.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Okay, fine: to the extent that a non-genocide position existed, Harris was it.

But the real point is that even if a person disagrees with you about that, they still should've voted for Harris. She was at least objectively not more genocidal than Trump, and infinitely better on basically every other issue.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

But at least we didn't help hurrying along the most recent great extinction!

I wonder if anything we built will last for the next sentient species that arises.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Well not voting in the American pres. election (or voting for someone sure to lose) was a half-vote for Donald. That's just math.

[–] torch_and_blanket@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh, no doubt, but a worse foe lurks! Some people voted for Donald Trump.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I totally feel this frustration, and I'm not US so it's kinda not my business, but I don't buy this argument.

Trump America is a horror show, for sure. But the status quo before Trump is also the foundations that allowed America to become a new facist state. Any real solutions need to be bigger than what middle of the road Democrats are offering.

That doesn't mean you shouldn't vote against Trump. But the system is clearly broken, stop blaming victims of it, and start blaming its perpetrators.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (9 children)

Status quo of Biden implementing Green energy, EVs, build back better, PACT act, chips act, student debt relief, Obama's healthcare. And you're equating this to .... status quo.... , and .... a foundation of a fascist state. ........

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Protest non-voters accounted for maybe 800k, while RFK accounted for 1.3m.

But sure, let's keep blaming voters instead of the Democrats that chose to represent Republican Lite™.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Republican lite at this moment sounds a lot more refreshing than Republican nazi

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I'm informing protest-non-voters what they actually voted for.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (52 replies)
[–] motor_spirit@lemmy.world 48 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"christians" just do not give a fuck about kids unless they're touching them or oppressing brown ones smfh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

Obviously a clerical error. The decimal place is off. It's supposed to be 0.00

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Probably a blessing in disguise. If they were funding climate research it would almost certainly be fraudulent science.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They had a corps of competent people with civil service protections who were getting paid out of that budget. They avoided committing fraud during the first Trump administration

[–] Tinidril@midwest.social 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This isn't the first Trump administration. This administration doesn't concern itself with civil service protections.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 7 points 2 weeks ago

They are trying change things, but there's a good chance basic stuff like measuring CO2 concentrations would continue normally with a nonzero budget

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Whaaaaat...?

The party who put a coal lobbyist in charge of the EPA for Trump's entire previous term did this...?

Nooooo.

/sarcasm

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

🔥La la la 👉🤑👈 not listening 🔥

[–] Nangijala@feddit.dk 7 points 2 weeks ago

At some point, all one can do is laugh.

load more comments
view more: next ›