jeffhykin

joined 1 year ago
[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Labeling datasets is costly process. When you dont opt out, you're letting them build a labelled dataset on you-specifically for free.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

Same for me: just say no, and they say OK. Effortless but the option is totally invisible.

The irony is, I've seen the staff stop using the face scanner for everyone halfway through the line to speed things up. So its not saving time, just costing money to increase surveillance.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, cookies, account logins, and other stuff make it hard too. Ex: randomly exploring gmail emails at different times of day, but not actually marking emails as read.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Psychology. Ever see ring doorbell footage where the owner says "drop the package" and people do? Its not like the owner could do anything, but for some reason it makes people behave differently.

 

Fingerprinting isn't always possible to defeat, and its not always possible to avoid making accounts (work and school accounts)

However, it should be possible to fill up tracked data with meaningless garbage and reduce the signal-to-noise ratio. Ex: a bot that browses random products on amazon to reduce profiling accuracy.

Do you guys know of any tools that do this? Anything from browser extensions to command line scripts, to anonymous group-accounts.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Here's a very similar question I asked here a few months ago: "Privacy respecting ring doorbell" https://lemm.ee/post/8165932

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

The clients are source available for telegram though

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean technically the client is verifiable if you use discord in a browser tab... and verify it every time you load the web page... 🙃

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 115 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I didnt upvote the other python-beginer friendly meme cause it wasn't accurate. But this one is on point.

[–] jeffhykin@lemm.ee 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Celebrities are going to be shocked when they hear about email

 

Why doesn't every computer have 256 char domain name, along with a private key to prove it is the sole owner of the address?

Edits: For those technically inclined: Stuff like DHCP seems unnecessary if every device has a serial number based address that's known not to collide. It seems way more simple and faster than leasing dynamic addresses. On top of that with VOIP I can get phone calls even without cell service, even behind a NAT. Why is the network designed in such a way where that is possible, but I can't buy a static address that will persist across networks endpoint changes (e.g. laptop connecting to a new unconfigured wifi connection) such that I can initiate a connection to my laptop while it is behind a NAT.

  • Yes, it would be a privacy nightmare, I want to know why it didnt turn out that way
  • When I say phone number, I mean including area/country code
  • AFAIK IP addresses (even static public ones) are not equivlent to phone numbers. I don't get a new phone number every time I connect to a new cell tower. Even if a static IP is assigned to a device, my understanding is that connecting the device to a new uncontrolled WiFi, especially a router with a NAT, will make it so that people who try to connect to the static IP will simply fail.
  • No, MAC addresses are not equivalent phone numbers. 1. Phone numbers have one unique owner, MAC addresses can have many owners because they can be changed at any time to any thing on most laptops. 2. A message can't be sent directly to a MAC address in the same way as a phone number
  • Yes, IMEI is unique, but my laptop doesn't have one and even if it did its not the same as an eSim or sim card. We can send a message to an activated Sim, we can't send a message to an IMEI or serial number
 
  • I make websites
  • If someone is banned twice (two accounts) I want it to take them more than 5min and a VPN to make a 3rd account
  • I'm okay with extreme solutions, like requiring everyone to have a Yubikey-or-similar physical key
  • I really hate the trend of relying on a phone number or Google capcha as a not-a-bot detection. Both have tons of problems
  • but spam (automated account creation) is a real problem

What kind of auth should I use for my websites?

43
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by jeffhykin@lemm.ee to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world
 

This might be a limitation of Lemmy or voyager, but is there some option for me to "watch" or "subscribe" to a post and be notified of new comments?

Especially relevant to asklemmy since occasionally I see a post before there's any answers.

25
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by jeffhykin@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world
 

If a human posted every 5 min, got 0 upvotes for 20 posts straight, we would ban them for spam. If bots would limit themselves to posting once a day, or once a week, and only post the top-voted non-duplicate post of that timeframe, it would be a dramatic improvement. For once, we might actually see real-lemmy posts along side bot posts, instead of the community being exclusively bots (or 99% bot posts) or exclusively Lemmy users.

I would tell the bot creators myself, except I don't know how to get in contact with them. Is there a consistent way to contact a bot creator?

view more: next ›