I suppose stack overflow is a really good use case for AI. Just make it stick to what it knows once you start implementing AI answers and not just funnelling user data the other direction.
h3ndrik
joined 2 years ago
Hope that gets open-sourced and made in to an complete out-of-the-box advertising platform. I've tried selfhosting ads and as of now there isn't much except for revive-adserver. Sure, and the big (closed) surveillance tech platforms everyone uses.
Though Lemmy has funding for full-time developers.
And it's not like other features get implemented in the meantime. Progress is really slow here, even compared to hobby projects.
Edit: Lol, thanks for downvoting.
Yes, you'd damage the car's electrical system. First of all it's not designed to feed in energy through that outlet. It's made to output energy.
And most importantly: 24V is way too much. 2 times the intended voltage would fry most electronics. Your stereo, the power steering, airbags, ... There is a good margin and car electronics are designed to be pretty robust, but you're pushing it.
I think they're still fine because what happens is your car battery absorbs that extra voltage. But it's really dangerous. On a sunny day you'll charge your car battery beyond the 14V or so the chemistry can handle. And at that point it'll degrade fast. The acid in there is going to start to boil, producing hydrogen, so in addition to a destroyed battery, you're in for a small explosion if you're very unlucky. And once the battery is gone it'll start frying the cars electronics because now there isn't anything keeping the voltage down.
Get a switch that exclusively connects either the car or the solar panel to the bluetti. One switch that switches between two things, not an On/Off switch. And make sure it's rated for the current.
Edit: Or a relais that toggles between both. It can switch if there's power on the 12V rail, and connect the bluetti to either or.
Hmmh. Why ActivityPub? I mean I suppose it's alright as a standard for some turn based or slow trading game. But it's neither very efficient nor suited for realtime. And having long (and descriptive) JSON messages, queues, ... is baked in per design.
And it's not even interesting to a Mastodon user if player x sold y latinum to player z. So for lots of game logic we don't need messages in a common format that's federated to Mastodon, Lemmy, Peertube etc.
I think a nice and not too complicated coding challenge would be to design a world that spans multiple servers. Players could roam a world, go through some door or portal and the client seamlessly connects to the next server. So that part of the world (the other server instance) is behind that portal. That'd make sense from an in-game perspective and won't be that hard to implement. Basically it's just like any other game, just that the client auto-connects to servers with some internal logic and not just in the start menu. And ideally authentication would be federated. The new server could ask the player's home instance to authenticate them on entering the new instance.
Clickbait!
Also the article mixes several distinct concepts that cannot be lumped together. The impending robot apocalypse like in the old scifi/action movies, ChatGPT, AGI and narrow AI that enables murder drones aren't the same thing. And if they are, I'd like to also add "algorithms" and recommendation systems making us more stupid and disuniting society.
I'm not saying it doen't need to be addressed, but the argumentation is just flawed.
There is one paragraph I completely agree with: »He's "worried about AI taking over mundane jobs." This would boost productivity, Hinton added, but the gains in wealth would disproportionately go to the wealthy [...]«
I'd say there is a 100% chance of this happening, unless someone steps in and regulates things. That's the one thing I find nice of Mark Zuckerberg (and a few others), that he gives state of the art language models to the people and enables them to take part in AI at all. Other than that, it's a game that is entirely directed and controlled by the rich and large tech companies. And we shouldn't rely on them (or Mark Zuckerberg) shaping our future.
Idk. Regulating how many pedestrians and bicyclists the autonomous cars are allowed to run over in a year seems to be a good idea to me. Depends a bit on what kind of law they come up with. And if they mean copyright is a burden to OpenAI... Then I want in on it, too. You should allow pirating eBooks and Marvel movies and Scarlett Johanssons voices to everyone, not just big tech companies.
How is divorce a matter of consent?
AFAIK the NLnet funding is still running and there were still some milestones to claim as I last asked them in some AMA. Should be paying them an additional 3.000€ a month?!
They really should be more transparent an link that stuff and their progress.
https://lemmy.ml/post/11023519
https://codimd.tyhou12.xyz/s/TukD_H96z#