correcthorsedickbatterystaple

joined 1 year ago
[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social 0 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

A not insignificant portion of the homeless are drug addicts, severely mentally ill, or both. These people can be dangerous. Not having them congregate in very public areas is a public safety issue. Full stop.

A not insignificant portion of the most vulnerable among the public are drug addicts, severely mentally ill, or both. These people can be dangerous due to not receiving treatment according to their and the public's health needs. Not having them ( "a not insignificant...untreated...portion of the homeless") congregate in very public areas is a human rights issue.

P.S. Both sides have valid points. The charity has a right to distribute food, but the most vulnerable among the public don't have the same right to safely use public facilities as the rest of the public.

if you're going through florida, keep going

biblically accurate samsung galaxy s24

[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

kissinger's death recently has led me to understand a few things. your hard right republicans pretrump are realpolitik. they want america on top no matter the cost. MAGA is a grift that's all about squeezing every penny out of the hyper-religious and or uneducated and or fascists. they don't care where america comes out in the end. cheney(s) et al want america on top no matter the cost. MAGA wants themselves on top no matter the cost. project for the new american century is USA USA USA no matter the morals. MAGA is we're number 1 (but just us not you)

if anyone's interested in some further reading / contextual information on this article / conflict specifically (or conflict generally):

distinction & proportionality

[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

"a fart is a turd honking for the right of way"

[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)
  1. we take as much wealth as possible by siphoning it from the populous.
  2. the portion of the populous that had wealth enough to siphon is dying year by year.
  3. the portion of the populous that's young has no wealth because we've been siphoning it already.
  4. we've siphoned all the wealth there is and we still aren't satisfied.
  5. pikachu face.
[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

you're absolutely right. perfect should be the enemy of good.

you honestly believe the global south will be no worse if the world's only hegemon turns fascist?

[–] correcthorsedickbatterystaple@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

my god how many stars had to align to make that joke. wish i could think of puns in my own response but even if i could they wouldn't match this. fucking bravo.

i'm probably going to come back to this in a few days and marvel at it again. JFC nicely done.

just wondering aloud here (genuinely - i'm not trying to be an ass)

are iphones sold from local shops? or just apple stores.

i think a lot of small business owners sell bread.

can buy a lot of bread after stealing an iphone

view more: next ›