charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

The fact that you assume this would be a shocking or objectionable suggestion speaks volumes.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 12 points 1 year ago

If you believe Trump, yes.

So in reality, no, not in any sense.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -2 points 1 year ago

Authoritarianism is never a good idea, even when used against authoritarians.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 48 points 1 year ago

What a snowflake. He literally whines about being interrupted.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 1 year ago

Sounds like a fatal problem. That's a shame.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

What you're saying is literally insane.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago

Which is exactly why the output of an AI trained on copyrighted inputs should not be copyrightable. It should not become the private property of whichever company owns the language model. That would be bad for a lot more reasons than the potential for laundering open source code.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago

“Telling any person qualified to register to vote or vote in New Hampshire that the January 23, 2024, New Hampshire democratic Presidential Primary Election is ‘meaningless’... constitutes an attempt to prevent or deter New Hampshire voters from participating [in the primary]... in violation of RSA 659:40, III,” Assistant Attorney General Brendan O’Donnell wrote in the order to the DNC, citing a portion of the state’s voting rights law.

RSA 659:40, III:

No person shall engage in voter suppression by knowingly attempting to prevent or deter another person from voting or registering to vote based on fraudulent, deceptive, misleading, or spurious grounds or information. Prohibited acts of voter suppression include:

(a) Challenging another person's right to register to vote or to vote based on information that he or she knows to be false or misleading.

(b) Attempting to induce another person to refrain from registering to vote or from voting by providing that person with information that he or she knows to be false or misleading.

(c) Attempting to induce another person to refrain from registering to vote or from voting at the proper place or time by providing information that he or she knows to be false or misleading about the date, time, place, or manner of the election.

Seems like the AG is really stretching. Calling it "meaningless" is almost certainly protected by the 1st Amendment.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

She's obviously setting up for another attempt to overthrow the government.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website -5 points 1 year ago

The part that you're apparently having trouble understanding is that a language model is not a human mind and a human mind is not a language model.

view more: ‹ prev next ›