charonn0

joined 2 years ago
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 9 points 2 years ago

A decent person would be ashamed of themselves.

(Hint: he's not)

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 166 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (13 children)

Congress has no oversight of state prosecutors. Jordan is using his position of power and trust to pervert the course of justice. This is blatant obstruction of justice.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

Only certain specific reasons can actually disqualify a candidate. For example, age, naturalization, or fomenting an insurrection after having sworn an oath to the US.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 3 points 2 years ago

The idea of checks and balances on the exercise of government powers extends to even the state/federal relationship.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 10 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Cybersecurity != Safety Critical

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 2 points 2 years ago

Best holodeck malfunction ever.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Treason is defined as levying war against the United States, or in adhering to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 71 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Remember Valentine's day 2004, when San Francisco county started issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples?

Thousands of couples showed up. Some from the other side of the planet, some from the other side of town. The County Clerk was overwhelmed and there weren't nearly enough wedding officiants to keep up. So they put out a call for volunteers to be deputized by the Clerk as county marriage commissioners. I volunteered and officiated at dozens of ceremonies at city hall.

Still have my official commission hanging on my wall.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

These would be 'rebel' states are among the poorest and most heavily dependent on federal subsidies. They need the US more than the US needs them.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 64 points 2 years ago (1 children)

“We will be ready to defend this case surrounding extremely newsworthy events when it goes to trial, likely in 2025,” a Fox spokesperson said in a statement after the ruling. “As a report prepared by our financial expert shows, Smartmatic’s damages claims are implausible, disconnected from reality, and on their face intended to chill First Amendment freedoms.”

Yeah, right. They already settled the Dominion case for almost a billion dollars. This case is practically identical. I actually hope they're stupid enough to take this one to trial.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There isn't even a criminal law to charge them with.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

On the contrary, the more unpopular the speech, the higher the bar.

view more: ‹ prev next ›