UnicornKitty

joined 1 year ago
[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

I feel like people are looking for a quick pill to take that will make them all better. So when they don't get it, they become jerks.

 

We, the mods of !autism@lemmy.world, are writing because we have alerted the users of our community that we will report their accounts should they explicitly identify that they are under 18 years old in a comment or post shown on Lemmy World to enforce the Lemmy World Terms of Service (ToS). In said post, several users have brought up arguments and hypothetical situations that we would like discussed by the Lemmy World admin team and other mods to get clear guidance on expectations of our moderating actions and help clarify the concerns of the users in our community.

Basically, the main argument we see is concerning the federated organization of Lemmy and the Fediverse in general. The ToS state that:

4.0.2: You are at least 18 years of age and over the regulated minimum age defined by your local law to access Lemmy.World.

4.1: No one under 18 years of age is allowed to use or access the website.

That clearly states that anyone under 18 years of age cannot access any of the site. However, users are arguing that if a user that is registered on another instance is under 18 years old and posts in a community or comments on a post that is originally from Lemmy World, that user is technically not accessing the site directly. Instead, they are interacting with their instance, and that instance interacts with Lemmy World through the Fediverse protocol. That user did not directly interact or access Lemmy World. The information from Lemmy World was forwarded to them, and the information they shared was forwarded to Lemmy World. This brings up some nuances with expectations for moderating in Lemmy World in general.

Are mods expected to report or ban a user of another instance that explicitly identifies themselves as under 18 years old through a post or comment that is federated into the community that we moderate? Another situation that will likely arise is that of a user of another instance making a post on their instance.

If their post is cross-posted to a community we moderate on Lemmy World, are we to delete the cross-post?

Who would be in violation of the ToS because of the cross-post: the original poster or the cross-poster?

Yet another situation that could easily arise revolves around a Lemmy World user engaging with other websites or internet services.

Suppose someone on another website or service strikes a similarity to a user of the actual Lemmy World instance and identifies as under 18 years old, are mods expected to investigate and enforce the policy of reporting and/or banning the user from Lemmy World based on a judgment call? We want to be clear that the purpose of our post is to clarify the expectations that the Lemmy World admin team has of its mods so that we can conscientiously and dependably comply with the policies that are set to help manage the instance.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I'm very interested in understanding. But I don't want to always be the smartest person in the room. I'm already the smartest in most situations I'm in IRL. If it was always like that, I'd definitely go crazy.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 10 points 11 months ago

My guess would be that with the huge amount of American males (it is a big country after all) people just assume. And women are known to care about animals more, whether that is true or not.

I've been called a guy before and my name doesn't exactly strike people as male. I am female. I've been on the internet long enough not to care.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago (4 children)

I would say no. Lots of the super smart people become eccentric. I suspect any smarter and they'd just end up flat crazy. Dealing with being the only one in the room who understands what you're saying can be lonely.

I'm working with a group of people, some 10 years younger than me, who don't really understand technology. It feels weird.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Back when I had this issue, it was because I had a stressful job, and all I want to do is go home but you get people on these winding ass country roads who don't know them so they go 20 under!!

Now I just get mad if someone is stupid and almost hits me.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This makes me sad. I was excited to find a decent browser too.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

My biggest one is $30 total. That's also my only patreon currently. I will do more of those soon. I have a list. The youtube memberships probably add up to somewhere around that amount in total. Yes it's probably way more than premium. I really loved the pay what you want phase of music, but at that time I was broke.

I am a big believer of supporting talent whenever I can. I am grateful that I have the chance to do so now. My current budget for that stuff is low right now because we are working on moving.

Thanks to the state of the US, we would have been considered middle class before, but now it's back to lower. Your dollars don't stretch very far. I'm lucky to have a husband who feels the same way I do. We will never be rich in money, but we help as much as we can wherever we go. We also make donations to non-profit organizations we know don't use that money to line their own pockets. So those are the smaller places that always get overlooked. I foster kittens, and we sponsor each one. That means we pay the fees associated with adopting said kitten.

Apologies for the info dump, but it's a subject I love. I've been dreaming of the day I could do these things since I was in single digits.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or you could just become a member of their channel. I look at it this way though. If a youtuber I'm watching has lots of subscribers, one more member in that community probably isn't going to make a difference. If a youtuber I'm watching doesn't have the subscriber numbers they deserve, I will become a member. I always choose the highest tiers for them too. And join their patreon and do the same there. If I do that, I will actually listen/watch on patreon then put both YouTube versions in my watch list for when I need background noise and just upvote both videos.

That way they get all the things I can possibly do for them without giving youtube as much as I give the creators. This is my understanding of how that works though. With premium, if they actually give any of that money to the creators (my heart says no, corporations suck), it would be way less than the channel membership would give them. I don't actually know how much premium costs though.

Please do correct me if I'm wrong. At the moment I don't have very many people on my memberships. And I know most people these days probably can't afford to do that, but even a $1 or $2 membership to one or a couple of them can make a difference to the ones you really support and who probably need it more than they'd get from premium.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What if we actually did? Scary.

[–] UnicornKitty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry that's not exciting enough.

view more: next ›