SaltSong

joined 1 month ago
[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I don't know if you've noticed, but a lot of the trouble in the US was caused by people using their freedom to do terrible things to people, and to set the stage for more of the same.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 3 points 1 day ago

Provided they don't touch freedom to not breed, and we don't put racist ducks in charge, I think that works be the easiest for me to bear.

But I don't want kids, so it's not much of a sacrifice.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

Me, if you used restoring the Roman Republic.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Win98SE was my favorite. Maximum just working, minimum trying to "help."

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

Also wouldn't work with the internet.

I remember being very frustrated by this particular implementation.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 9 points 1 day ago

The 90's kids who bypass the old rules are the same ones trying to implement new rules.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 12 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I mean, his wife might be really hot.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

She's not putting up much of a defence.

As an aside, do the lesbian cabals have enough resources to get on with the destruction of western civilization, or do they have a gofundme, or something?

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 6 points 1 day ago

That is . . . Distressingly accurate.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

This strikes me as a terrible idea.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website -1 points 2 days ago

Because we built a system where only 34 people in the entire nation get paid too look as far as six years into the the future. The president, and 1/3 of the Senate cap out at 4 years. The House of Representatives and 1/3 of the Senate can see 2 years ahead. Most CEOs and industry leaders are limited to 3 months.

[–] SaltSong@startrek.website 1 points 2 days ago

I have specific interests.

view more: ‹ prev next ›