Hey! Good to know about the 128 kbps threshold.
What's your take on MP3 bitrates? I've read some posts online claiming that 320 kbps is overkill most of, if not all of, the time. They claimed that there is little to no gain going above around 220 kbps. In your experience, is there any truth to this?
For lower bitrates, I'd suggest using a different codec than MP3. Opus is really solid, and at 128 kbps it will probably get you quality similar to MP3 at 192 kbps. Or you could go lower, and 96 kbps with Opus will be similar to MP3 at 128 kbps. I don't know an app that will do it automatically, but the CLI tools are really simple to use: you point them at the FLAC and tell it the target bitrate and that's it.
Alternatively, if you have access to a macOS machine, their AAC encoder is really good and likely superior to any MP3 encoder at equivalent bitrates.
So, in fact, the short answer is no.
The answer is only yes if the question is “Hibernating and booting into another OS and modifying the same partition externally: will my filesystems be corrupted?”.
I don't really get the "all eggs in one basket"
I think the argument is that if at some point Proton services get compromised, or if Proton somehow turn into the bad guys, then using fewer of their services will impact you less or give you more time to react. The same goes for any other vendor, of course, which is why the way you address this is by spreading your trust across different services/regions/owners/....
So the two-factor authentication apps shouldn't be on desktop argument never made sense to me, mobile is the same way.
I think that argument was rooted in the assumption that the phone was a separate and smaller attack surface. The assumption is reasonable if you use your credentials mostly on desktop and only have a few apps on your phone, which was indeed the case for a lot of people in the past.
But nowadays, a lot of people use the same credentials on the phone just as well, and with everything asking to install their app, I'm not sure the attack surface really is smaller anymore. So, if you're in this scenario, I agree with you that you may not be sacrificing much by having 2FA on desktop.
And, of course, 2FA, even in the same password manager, is still better than none. Your first factor can be stolen in more ways than just compromising your machine, for example through data breaches.
I don't know. The quality of the food you get through a lot of these delivery services is already much worse than going to the restaurant yourself, whether it's from fast food chains or independent restaurants. Even food from restaurants that are otherwise good often arrives cold/mushy/damaged. And yet, food delivery services get a lot of customers...
Hi, I’m interested to know what you’re using now!
About halfway through the article they quote a paper from 2023:
Similarly, another study from 2023 found LLMs “hallucinated,” or produced incorrect information, in 69 to 88 percent of legal queries.
The LLM space has been changing very quickly over the past few years. Yes, LLMs today still "hallucinate", but you're not doing anyone a service by reporting in 2025 the state of the field over 2 years before.
It's a shame. The app worked well, and it was nice to have a native look rather than a generic web one.
Thanks a lot!