Luvs2Spuj

joined 2 years ago
[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've read this response and the about section of the community and I still don't understand, sorry. I'm not trying to be difficult but thought it might be useful to you for growing the community to know.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Better version

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

Surely a community poll to choose the picture? Power hungry mods forcing the custard cream agenda...

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

Beans never dipped. Bean hands baby, to the moon

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Is a fruitarian someone who only eats fruit? Do these people exist? Do they have normal bathrooms?

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Jacking off is great, so is beef stroganoff.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Aw damn, that's not an option with fairphones

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I have nothing constructive to contribute other than I feel smug and superior because I have a fairphone, so I can change mine if that ever happens.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I am [age] and enjoy this content that is targeted at [other generation or demographic]

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Nothing wrong with this post

 

I have a load of filters set up on my feed, notably I don't want to see Trump or Elon.

Due to recent events, so much content is coming through that it is as if I don't have filters at all.

If the text or title doesn't include the key words, it can't be filtered. All the screenshots or posts with jokes or bad titles can't be filtered.

I think the only way proper filters could be achieved is with a separate 'tags' field that could be added to or voted on by community members.

This might all seem like a lot of effort, but feed filters are such a good feature that I think it would be worth it.

I don't want unreasonable perfection for the filters, but the system seems too flawed at the moment.

I have no idea where this kind of discussion or decision would be made so I'm just throwing it out as a question here.

 

There are lots of issues I have with them in terms of privacy, but I'm going to be very specific in asking about a certain situation and would prefer to stay on that topic if possible.

I have seen someone showing AI glasses which allow the wearer to cheat at chess. The glasses provide the wearer with computer engine moves, essentially making them unbeatable against even the strongest grand masters.

How can someone prevent this from happening, for example in a tournament match?

I don't consider this as being an issue at the highest level of professional play, but for club and casual players they might not have the resources to deal with this.

Currently the camera and/or screen information might be fairly obvious just by looking, but assuming technology improves this could become harder to detect.

Retrospectively, it would be easy to spot a cheater and correct results, however this still spoils things by having the cheating in the first place.

It isn't realistic to ask people to play without glasses, and I'm not aware of any way to stop cameras or ai from functioning.

So what can be done, if anything?

 

As a non USA resident, I didn't know who this was. Before I read the post that was the name I had in my head.

 

Sorry for the poor quality / lack of screenshot, this is from my work computer which I isolate from my personal devices, so I just took a picture.

view more: next ›