It don't. Mostly becouse it don't have to. Your online behavior is easier accessible and a better predictor... (pretty bad over-all, but still better. Digital Marketing Bubble is bursting!)
Ideonek
joined 3 weeks ago
That's why I find idea that no gamer in Ready Player One tried running a car backward offensive.
You're right of course. I'm thinking about some other company.
Thanks. I heard good things as well. But I'm here becouse I'm trying to use less US companies. Open source is not nothing, and it still progress over google. But it's not what I'm looking for in that specific moment.
But I appreciate your recommendation!
Power Rangers is a patchwork work edited with footage from a few different shows. Robots from one, costume fights from others. It was not really a reboot, they just took the footage of this yellow-costumed guy fighting and use it directly.
Hope not.
I'm basic, so all I want is much better Photos.
<Tom holding a door open meme >
Ok. Let's take a step back
You have companies in Poland. Let's call them A, B and C.
And we have company D in USA.
One of those A,B,C is a "child" of company D. Other two simply do business with company D.
Company D in they finacial statmet - that is a 3rd party statment that you have no rights to audit in any way, in some cases it want even be avaible to you - claim that they earned $10M from each A, B and C. (This is the "hearsay" becouse it's an information form outside your bouble of control. You have no way of verifying it. US gov have, but they are 3rd party to you and company A, B and C)
A, B, and C each in their tax reports created for you claim that those $10M is their cost.
In case of one you say "no, it's not your cost, it's your profit".
What specific difference between A, B, C makes you say that? One is similarly named to D? It won't be, by next tax year. All all registered in Poland. All have polish board. All spand money at company D. What's the difference? What parameter would you choose to tax one of those but not the other?
Working theory is that you don't get to his point by having morals.
I don't belive it did.