Endward23

I don't have much trust in studies like this at all.

I remember read studies which shows opposed conclusions.

Thank you for this comment.

Nudging is back.

I don't like the idea that the people currently in power will gain such controll over the behaviour, even the wishes, of the individual. And I would not like it with other people either.

The fact that it’s ungoverned and standard, but the immediately obvious fix is not a situation people want either.

Please elaborate.

Too bad, nobody has made a copy of it on, say, a webside like archive today... I can't copy it for copyright reasons...

We come in the situation that communities like this one here become more and more important since nobody can stop the SEO.

Friendly users will help you with usefull links. I know, many people has made bad experience with internet trolls or just echo chamber but his wasn't the case anytime.

We are in a kind of "new usenet".

Yeah, I wouldn’t be too confident in Facebook’s implementation, and I certainly don’t believe that their interests are aligned with their users’.

I'm quite sure, they arn't. This statement doesn't mean that I think they have bad intention or something. It's just, at least for me, obivious that the interest of the users and these of the companies are highly different. This is also the case with other companies and their customers.

Having access to the data means that they will be required by law to provide that data to governments in various circumstances.

A more paranoid person than myself would suspect that any big enough gouverment world simply force the companies to collect and share data.

The metadata problem is common to a lot of platforms.

From the viewpoint of the cooperations, this is a good deal. Enough privacy to keep people on the plattform and still enough data for advertisment.

Meta-Data is a good wordplay here, even if not intended and the correct wording...

Books and textes on paper have one big favour: They are not as easy to change than digital textes.

I hear the message but to be honest, I can't believe it. There must something I don't get. But at a second thought, in the google search resolutes, I see a lot of dubious resultes.

Putting human organs in a critter has the potential to act like a bridge if we’re not careful, and essentially spawn new covids.

Thats exact a problem. I personally think the solution could be a mixture of organoids and using this methode to create new organs. Since we are already able to cultived organoids. The problem is that his tissue doesn't grow in the form of "natural" organs and do not make connections with the blood and nerv systems.

As far as I remembered, the problem with eg. Dolly was that we doesn't know enough about epigenetics. Time change and we are on a more sophisticated, still far away from perfect, level.