They left a cryptic note about free will and not mixing textiles a few millennia back and haven't been on the mammals-dev Slack since.
It's alright, we're pretty sure adoption is going to peak soon anyway.
CanadaPlus
joined 2 years ago
Oooh, that's a new one to me! Biology is a never ending source of these oddball examples.
I think this guy might be an exec, not a programmer.
A time traveller comes back from 50 years in the future. You have 3 hours with them. What do you do?
Yeah, why waste time talking? Sneakersnet me!
Quite possibly. I'm no good as a politician or salesperson, but that would be the policy solution to a lack of reliability in the allocation process.
If the guys who are always drunk on working Saturdays win because they have a longer attention span, that's just unbelievable.
To be clear to anyone skimming, we're currently spending half of what Russia does each month.
It's kind of impressive how well it's been going in that light. Our system is truly much more efficient.
In the future, it would be good if there was a way to allocate budget to supporting foreign wars the way it's allocated for domestic militaries. Right now it sounds like it goes package-by-package, so spending is very difficult to sustain once the public gets bored.
Actually, I bet you could implement that in less. You should be able to legibly get several weights in one line.
Is there documentation of that somewhere?
The US when Israel openly does bad stuff: "We've done nothing and we're all out of ideas!"
Yeah, I kind of wish there was another word for the idea, because it's a bit confusing. I think originally it was "in reaction to progress".
Big and small c conservative is sometimes used to make the distinction in commentary, with big C being the reactionary stances that are common in right-wing parties that call themselves "Conservative", but I don't think everyone gets that either.
Alright, that's a weaker claim (that is, less of an extraordinary claim) than I was expecting. LLMs aren't quite as good as a human at conceptual originality yet, and I can't prove they will catch up, especially if thematic subtext is the measure.
I guess I'll just say my original point stands then. There's a difference between something made from a prompt by ChatGPT, and something produced from a roughly equivalent text by a translation tool.