CanadaPlus

joined 2 years ago
[–] CanadaPlus 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Actually, I'd say it made them a country, back before they lost all their territory.

I'm not sure what the exact term we use has to do with the fate of socialist systems anyway, so I won't reduce myself to arguing about it. If you don't have anything else, I think we're done here.

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 2 years ago

Not particularly related, but neat. I learned some things.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

And don’t worry they have defenses against spammers and bots.

I don't think we do, actually. I fully expect it will become a major problem as Lemmy grows.

I hate punching in something identifying too, and avoid it when possible, but the internet has collectively gone there for a reason. And that reason is that if you can make an anonymous account, a guy in Nigeria can make 1000.

(Sorry, I think I came across a little aggressive in OP, not my intention)

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

For whatever reason, people want it to be more complicated than "2463 households need 2463 houses". I mean, at the nitty-gritty level it is, but at scale that's the sort of complexity that cancels itself out if you just leave it alone enough, as all the Western countries do last I checked.

You see a weird sort of symbiosis between affluent NIMBYs and some of the less sophisticated antipoverty activists, sometimes. In a housing crisis, would it be better to build small apartments rather than luxury apartments, given a fixed square footage? Yes. Are luxury apartments still houses? Also yes. Both groups want to ignore the second bit, but for completely opposite reasons relative to the first bit. Sometimes, they work together and manage to get no houses built at all.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Why, so spammers can find them?

[–] CanadaPlus 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (7 children)

I guess the crisis itself could be and was, but at the time nobody was really talking about the concept of a cold war, and the nuclear threat stayed heightened for decades. Actually, opinions vary on how long a nuclear-power conflict can reliably stay cold, even now.

AI and nuclear war seem like the main direct threats right now. Climate change will suck and I'll miss coral reefs, but it's not planet killing unless it sets something else more deliberate off. The world looks unstable, but I'm not expecting WWIII this year, and AI isn't going to be very dangerous by 2025 either. The Cuban missile crisis should have ended the world as we know it in the span of a few months. We basically just won a few coin flips in a row; I bet other parallel universes weren't so lucky.

[–] CanadaPlus 0 points 2 years ago
[–] CanadaPlus 34 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (9 children)

It broke in the 90's. History was "over" so they kind of adjusted the scale, and now that shit's real again they keep having to shave off tiny increments closer and closer to midnight.

We're still way better off than during the Cuban missile crisis, imminent existential risk-wise.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 2 years ago

Historically, because it breaks fairly often. Building an OS that runs on all reasonable hardware without explicit cooperation from hardware manufacturers is tough.

[–] CanadaPlus 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

From the perspective of the people who make the crap, corporations are the users.

[–] CanadaPlus 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He got a hand-me-down iPhone because he's poor, and has decided it's better than no phone, but is sad it's still a walled garden despite other people being rescued.

Is there a joke I'm missing?

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 2 years ago

New Guam, maybe.

view more: ‹ prev next ›