this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
144 points (84.3% liked)

World News

39151 readers
2330 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CanadaPlus 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I guess the crisis itself could be and was, but at the time nobody was really talking about the concept of a cold war, and the nuclear threat stayed heightened for decades. Actually, opinions vary on how long a nuclear-power conflict can reliably stay cold, even now.

AI and nuclear war seem like the main direct threats right now. Climate change will suck and I'll miss coral reefs, but it's not planet killing unless it sets something else more deliberate off. The world looks unstable, but I'm not expecting WWIII this year, and AI isn't going to be very dangerous by 2025 either. The Cuban missile crisis should have ended the world as we know it in the span of a few months. We basically just won a few coin flips in a row; I bet other parallel universes weren't so lucky.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

but it's not planet killing

That’s cool except no one is arguing about it killing the planet. What it will do is kill our environment which is the part that determines the survival of our species.

[–] CanadaPlus -1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's not environment-killing either, at least as far as growing wheat and tomatoes is concerned. Environment-damaging, sure, but we could potentially starve a lot of people and keep going (though we shouldn't!), and it's not even clear agricultural output will go down rather than just relocating.

Don't get me wrong, I like having wild animals besides rats and flies, and I don't love the idea of a giant global mass-migration crisis as Bangladesh sinks into the sea and we fight over farmland in what used to be an icecap, so I still think we need to crack down on fossil fuels a lot harder. We're pretty adaptable, though, and some sad little human world will exist on the other side if that's all.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Tell that to the crop failures.

Not only is your opinion absolutely wrong but it’s a dangerous one too because it removes the need to change and to do so quickly.

This is why nothing will ever change and why humans will continue polluting and destroying our habitat.

Humans are fucking stupid.

[–] CanadaPlus 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Crops in western America might fail, but the whole world isn't America. Yields move, and 2023-2024 was a record harvest globally.

Don't take my word for it, there's an actual scientist elsewhere in the thread.

Humans are fucking stupid.

Well, we can agree on that. The human reaction to "the world is ending" is usually giving up. Which is why we shouldn't say that unless the science supports that, which it doesn't quite.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Unfortunately we lost the coin toss that gave us Wilson rather than Teddy Roosevelt for The Great War.

[–] CanadaPlus 2 points 10 months ago

Not particularly related, but neat. I learned some things.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 10 months ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Wilson

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.