Apepollo11

joined 2 years ago
[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 102 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

I didn't get it, so looked to see if the answer was on other sites. Full credit to Tisha Bell on Facebook.

"if you notice, around a certain time, there stopped being villains and became more about breaking generational traumas, and believing in yourself"

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 27 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I tried to find out what you were referring to - was it the rude person in the vegan thread? If you look, they were pretty heavily rebutted and downvoted by the other users.

The mods uphold the community guidelines, ideally without overreach. If someone's out of line, but not technically breaking any rules, the other users are usually good at putting people straight.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

This. Dirt cheap material cost, no additional machining costs.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

The Bee Network is the biggest quality of life improvement for me personally.

In the bad old days, the buses were contracted to a company called First. The service was both unreliable and expensive.

I'm lucky enough to live in a place on the outskirts of Greater Manchester that isn't too densely populated. Unfortunately that means it was also not profitable for First, so we had one bus an hour - the absolute minimum required to fulfil the contract. Except that wasn't the reality - frequently the busses would be cancelled (with no way of would-be passengers knowing), so you could be waiting for two hours or more.

The fares were extortionate - it was actually cheaper for me to drive to work.

The buses themselves were antiquated piles of scrap that rattled as the vibrations of the engine violently shook the whole frame.

With the Bee Network, the buses are nice, clean and run on time. They can be tracked by app. The fares are capped at £2. They are more frequent and more reliable.

This probably all sounds stupid to anyone from London or anywhere else with competent people running their transport services, but the change has been like night and day.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I really hope this doesn't happen.

Not because I don't think he'll be any good as PM, but because he's already brilliant as Mayor of Manchester. It sounds absurd, but Andy Burnham has made so many improvements to the quality of life for us Manchester folk, I don't want to entertain the thought of losing him.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

As much as I hate to fight his corner, I don't think we should really be pulling people up for things they said as children, especially four(?) decades ago.

Children are idiots. Teenagers especially.

Farage has plenty of nasty friends, nasty ideas and nasty actions to focus on, I'm worried that all this kind of thing will do is distract from that stuff.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You've basically said much of what I was going to!

We know where memories are stored in the brain, physically. The biggest problem with targeting specific memories is simply a matter of working out which neurons are tied to that memory.

We can already, fairly crudely, see roughly where a memory is stored by looking at brain activity when the patient recalls it. We can also directly trigger memory recollection by applying electrodes to the brain during brain surgery.

There's still massive engineering challenges to overcome to get this to a practical stage, but engineering challenges are usually surmountable. With that in mind, do I think the technology will be doable, ever?

  • Technology to erase specific memories - absolutely.

  • Technology to replace specific memories with new ones - I suspect yes, but that'll need some big leaps in our understanding of how memories actually work.

  • Technology to do this with just a flash of light - no, probably not.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I like to think there are still some good Labour MPs. They just need to be liberated from the New Labour guys who have been parasitically sustaining themselves on the goodwill people still had towards the old party.

Labour can then go back to protecting people's rights instead of arguing that they have too many, and New Labour can do whatever it is a spineless morally-amorphous knee-jerk-policy-making vote-chasing group of self-important posh-boys want to do, now unshackled from such legacy burdens as principles and ethics.

But, realistically, they won't split. New Labour can only exist because of the masses of people who vote Labour because they've always voted Labour. Lose the name, they lose the votes.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (2 children)

TIL George Orwell was a pen name.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think by coalition they mean the "broad church" within Labour - the left-wingers and right-wingers.

An actual coalition with another party is impossible under Labour's own rules - party members are not allowed to endorse another party under any circumstances.

I honestly think that instead of trying to hold it all together the only thing that can save Labour is a schism. Remove the New Labour bods like you'd extract an aggressive tumour, and let them fend for themselves as a separate party. Labour gets back to its roots as a championing the working man, without all the Machiavellian nonsense from the New Labour side.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

As long as Robbie Gibb is there, the BBC will never regain any of the trust it has lost over the past decade. The guy would never have been allowed near the board by a government with any shred of propriety, but unfortunately for us the Tories inserted him onto it like Palatine putting Anakin Skywalker onto the Jedi Council.

[–] Apepollo11@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You stopped reading after the first few words again? Makes sense.

14
MasterChef (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by Apepollo11@lemmy.world to c/ukcasual@lemmy.world
 

Can't help but think the BBC could have avoided a lot of controversy over the new series simply by using AI to replace Gregg Wallace with Loyd Grossman.

 

I got some of the Sunlu High Speed PLA that I've been hearing good things about. On the first print I discovered that, while it prints beautifully, it creates a ludicrous amount of dust going through the extruder.

So I open it up to clean it out, when suddenly the tensioning spring shoots out. Searched for about an hour in total, it's nowhere to be seen.

I'd been thinking of replacing the extruder for a dual gear one anyway, so I took the opportunity to order a nice one from Micro-Swiss.

The problem is, that I have an FLSun Q5, and I'd seen from videos online that it doesn't quite sit flush - you need to print a spacer.

So I needed to get the printer patched up for one last hurrah. The spring was salvaged from a broken clothes peg. And it worked perfectly - not just "well enough", but easily as good as the original.

So in summary, if it helps anyone, losing the spring doesn't mean you need a new part - a clothes peg spring works just as well.

 

I'm seeing a lot of international messages getting this wrong, so this is how you refer to the Prime Minister of the UK.

First, we normally refer to the PM just by name, like anyone else. So, "Keir Starmer" or "Mr Starmer".

"Prime Minister" is not used as a title like "President" is. He's not "Prime Minister Starmer". He's just "the Prime Minister" or "the Prime Minister, Keir Starmer".

Unusually, this new PM is also a knight. Of course, this has its own rules.

If you want to use this title, it's not quite as simple as replacing "Mr" with "Sir'. The first name is more important than the surname here. He's not "Sir Starmer". He's "Sir Keir Starmer" or "Sir Keir".

Hope it helps!

view more: next ›