Alsjemenou

There is no way that with proper care your joints should be creaking at 30. And its absolutely bullshit that at 45 you can't be in good shape or even better shape than your twenties. High level competition is done at all age levels, it has never stopped at 30 or even 45. If you are competitive you can find competition. But that's rhe problem, most people just stop competitive sport, they hit their limit and find it hard to continue to improve. So they take other direction in life. But then also stop taking care of themselves and never kept a regime up. No, most just fall into the trope of the body ending after your twenties. It doesn't, your body is capable of being healthy, strong and supple. Through food and light exercise to keep it up and if you want high level workout regimes.

Yes. I look down on people.

I'm 45 and topfit. If you really feel like you're declining at 30 you've never taken care of yourself. What makes you think you can do it now?

Preferably to remain steady: Eat a varied (mostly) plant based diet. Work up a sweat at least 3 times a week and do some light movement everyday for 30 minutes. You don't need to do anything crazy, you don't need to fucking start pumping iron, you don't need to become a protein bro. Just find 30 minutes a day and stop eating food that you already know is bad for yourself. Especially not too much.

And fucking go to a doctor when your joints hurt or it takes you 5 time's longer to heal. It's not normal. Stop normalizeing being unhealthy.

Like it has always been done. This question is such a weird one to me. The problem isn't that AI is making shit up, people make shit up all the time. They lie, cheat, make mistakes, are dumb, etc. The problem is that we don't know if we can trust what we trusted before. But the solution is always simply trusting certain people to tell you the truth. scientists, journalists, teachers, publishers, etc. This has never not been the case. We can't trust AI not dreaming up answers. That's just how it is, and that's not a problem that needs solving. It's a fundamental part of current LLM technology.

Maybe in the future we can find something that makes LLM's more trustworthy, but as of yet, that's simply not the case. So I don't see a problem here. If you want to know the truth about something you're going to have to look at sources and do some digging until you find something you're trusting, then that's what's real to you.

And unless you want some deep philosophical discussion on the nature of Truth and how to arrive at Reality. Than this is how it works and how it has always worked.

posted by a bot

There probably were random kidnappings.

But they only allowed Jews to live in ghetto's in Nazi cities, so they knew exactly where to go. From there they were indiscriminate and retaliatory. But there was segregation before the mass deportation of Jews.

Also it was about the purity of the german blood and shit like that, so there were more allegations for people to be considered degenerate enough to be deported. Gays, gypsies, retardation, whatnot.

So, without animal products, the answer is yes. with animal products the answer is no, then we're way over the sustainability threshold. It is so inefficiënt and costs so much land and resources that the argument that the wealthy are hoarding resources is looking merely like a small problem in comparison.

Besides. Would humanity ever actually be happy and fulfilled when millions of animals have to suffer to get there? I would argue, not actually, not on a deep level. Superficially, perhaps.

The connection between attention and economic value has been around for a long time. It didn't come about by YouTube creators. The headlines sells papers. Commercials sells products. Titles sell views.

The problem is that there is no punishment for falsehoods, you can say that you have the first, the biggest, the most, the craziest and it doesn't need to have any bearing on reality. While in other media there are often some safeguards, code of conducts, or whatever. Since most other media has competitors, keeping eachother somewhat honest or straight up have an oversight committe. While platforms like TikTok, YouTube, etc. are exploiting content creators and care only about their short term growth. There will constantly be a stream of new content creators who will have to compete for views on the same platform, with the same algorithms.

Calmly and consistently close his door saying ”you left it open, let me get for you."

Repeat as often as is necessary.

The weight of the removed soil would sink the land.

Yeah those! They sound amazing as well