this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35600 readers
670 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

They don’t have a brain really and kinda just float there. Do they even feel pain?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MrPeach4tlanta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 1 points 1 year ago

They have no brain but aren't they like almost entirely nervous system? That's all you need to feel pain; the brain just makes it more complicated than "ouch, move away from that."

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I found a couple of articles on this:

No.”

it’s complicated.”

[–] robotdna@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

After having kept jellyfish as pets (Atlantic bay nettles), I wouldn't really consider them to be vegetarian nor vegan. While similar to plants, seemed to have a greater sense of environmental awareness than my plants. Mine could sense light, have "off days", and interact with their environment. It's probably true that there's not much going on there due to the small amount of nerves that control everything, but even when mine would accidentally get caught on tank cleaning tools or get bumped around they'd react in a protective way and to me it's just similar enough to animalistic behavior that I'd not feel comfortable consuming them if I were vegan.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So is this theory of veganism to not cause pain to an animal? If so what about ethically sourced meat. Like bullet to the head/decapitation. Most of those creatures feel nothing, they just end.

Or is it to not eat anything that comes from the an organism from the Animalia kingdom because harming animals is immoral?

After proofreading, these sound more aggressive/argumentative than i had intended but they get the point across.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Veganism means to reduce the suffering and exploitation of animals as much as practically possible.

There is nothing ethical about killing a living being that doesn't want to die.

[–] _finger_@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I thought it had less to do with suffering and exploitation (animals do this to each other, no way to stop that nor should we) but more to do with climate change. Cattle farms are causing massive climate change for instance.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Humans are moral agents, though. Just because something happens in nature, that doesn't make it okay. There are lots of examples of rape among wild animals, but that doesn't make it okay for humans to do it.

A lot of vegans are concerned about climate change, too, but it's really tangential to the philosophy. Veganism came out of the animal rights movement, so it's really concerned with exploitation and suffering. If there were no environmental issues with animal products, vegans would still be vegans.

[–] I_AnoN_I@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Morals are a social construct

[–] Robbeee@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Just because something is a social construct doesn't mean it isn't real or important.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, sometimes its ethical. Its kind of unnecessary (and therefore immoral) at the scale of modern meat farms. But on a more individual level with like subsistence hunting/livestock, i dont feel like there are any ethical problems. Like if you need food or you will die, animals lives are worth less than humans lives…

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

The need to hunt for food to prevent dying yourself is not really a problem in today's society unless you are indigenous and living outside of our society. So there is no real argument there.

[–] TheYang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So is this theory of veganism to not cause pain to an animal? If so what about ethically sourced meat. Like bullet to the head/decapitation. Most of those creatures feel nothing, they just end.

lots (propably most) animals used for farming meat are in pain during their lives.
That's longer than the time they're dying in any case.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

I understand that completely, death isn’t where the suffering usually occurs. This brings me to another question that i proposed in response to a different comment.

I had family that raised a cow to eventually become meat. It was named Tasty and lived up to its namesake. Tasty was treated well and killed quickly and cleanly. Is that, like, bad?

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

No Brain? For Jellyfish, No Problem

“I think sometimes people use its lack of a brain to treat a jellyfish in ways we wouldn’t treat another animal,” Helm says. “There are robots in South Korea that drag around the bay and suck in jellyfish and shred them alive. I’m a biologist and sometimes sacrifice animals, but I try to be humane about it. We don’t know what they are feeling, but they certainly have aversion to things that cause them harm; try to snip a tentacle and they will swim away very vigorously. Sure, they don’t have brains, but I don’t think that is an excuse to put them through a blender.”

[–] raltoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They're animals, so no.

[–] FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Jellyfish eat animals and animal byproducts, so no, they are not vegan.

Jokes aside, often vegans follow dietary restrictions for reasons other than an ethical or moral belief against causing pain. Many vegans don't even eat honey, so I imagine jellyfish is pretty safely in non-vegan territory.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] LufyCZ@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Can't agree fully.

My mother has a hive in the garden. The bees pollinate our garden, live lives as nice as bee's lives can be and, at the end of the year, we take some of their honey and replace it with sugar, which the bees don't care about.

It's a win-win, nobody is hurt, nobody is taken advatage of.

[–] hardware26@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I thought your first sentence was serious at first, since it genuinely makes sense to me. If growing a jellyfish causes animal suffering, I can see why a vegan may reject to eat it for ethical reasons.

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are carnivores plants vegan? Genuinely curious, never looked into it.

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Plants aren't sentient, so yes.

[–] moog@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

they feel pain, communicate, reproduce, move around, why are plants any different than animals? honest question

[–] voidMainVoid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plants may react to damage, but that isn't the same thing as pain. Plants don't have a brain or a central nervous system.

[–] Aux@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Neither do jellyfish and many other animals. Veganism is just arbitrary lunacy.

[–] MedicPigBabySaver@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this time it is impossible to know if they feel pain. They're a living creature.

[–] RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Plants are also living creatures, but don't tell the Vegans.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They told me Lemmy would be more leftist, why am I still seeing 0 IQ vegan jokes

[–] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's lemmy.ml. I think most of us just want this to be a place with less politics and extremism on either side because it's exhausting.

[–] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's more extreme: not wanting to harm and exploit animals or killing and exploiting them to use them as products?

I think it's pretty clear.

[–] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The former, by definition, because the vast majority of society does the latter. Extremists always try to reframe themselves as the moderate ones and say mainstream society are the extremists instead, so I'm not surprised you're saying this.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

plants are not "creatures", neither are animals. both are indeed living evolutures ;)

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How would you define creature?

[–] oSillyScope@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The word creature is theistic. The person you're responding to is being pedantic, but isn't wrong.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the definition. I think it is wrong. But i appreciate it nonetheless.

My reasoning is that, while it may have started as a theistic word, it isn’t anymore. When someone says it i don’t think “a creation of God” i just think of like, an animal. Definitions change over time.

[–] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I believe that it is not, since scientifically it is an animal. However, some vegetarians (not vegans) will eat fish or certain animal products.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I thought that people who would eat fish but not other animals were pescatarians.

[–] popemichael@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of Jelly fish are immortal? Just leave a few cells and wait for it to come back to life. Death-free food for the win

[–] keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean, milk could also easily be death-free, but it's not vegan. It's also not suffering-free. So this suggestion kind of misses the point.

[–] Tb0n3@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think milking cows causes suffering?

[–] anakin78z@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, what cow wouldn't want to have sperm shoved up it's apparently not privates to be continuously impregnated. Sounds like a party

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It doesn't have to be that way

[–] De_Narm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

But it mostly is. And calves likely get shot afterwards (or worse) both for population control and, well, you can't have them drinking all the milk now, can you? Same as eggs could be cruelty free, if we ignore the literal shredding of male chicks thats happening on a massive scale.

If you want to mass produce these things, which are both produced by females exclusively as part of their reproduction cycle, you basically have no other choice but to get rid of most males or even most children in the case of milk.

And even if you somehow solve this, I still would argue that its morally wrong to even have these breeds of e.g. chickens who lay this many eggs. Their bodies were never ment to do this and they suffer from sever health problems because of this.

[–] pinwurm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It depends on the definition of Veganism.

There’s is a popular school of thought that the diet‘s sole purpose to reduce suffering. If a living thing has no central nervous system (or brain), it has no thoughts and cannot experience pain or harm. It’s not much different than a fruit or vegetable. I know vegans that make exceptions for oysters - for example.

Others schools of thought are about avoiding animal products altogether, it doesn’t matter if it suffers or not - there’s no way to know. Therefore, it’s immoral to eat them if you can knowingly choose an alternative.

[–] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There’s is a popular school of thought that the diet‘s sole purpose to reduce suffering. If a living thing has no central nervous system (or brain), it has no thoughts and cannot experience pain or harm.

What about instant death? Like a farmer putting down a well-treated cow with a bullet to the head. In this scenario, the cow never suffered. In all likelihood it probably never even had much mental distress, let alone fear of death. Would that meat be ethical/vegan friendly?

[–] pinwurm@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Suffering is a broad definition. One would argue that prematurely ending sentient life without their consent would fit that definition.

Often, it’s not suffering on an individual level - but the suffering of a species. Cows live in bondage and we benefit from their labor and chose to end their lives for our benefit.

Sometimes Vegans extend this philosophy to pets and service animals - even if they’re treated exceptionally well.

The point is that Veganism is less monolithic than folks tend to believe. A person’s diet can be deeply personal and it’s up to them to draw lines.

I’m a meat eater. I don’t have an issue eating cows. I don’t have an issue eating rabbits, which I know people also keep as pets. I don’t have an issue eating lobster - whereas they’re boiled alive. But I know I couldn’t eat a cat or dog. Realistically, I have trouble with veal. So ya know, where I draw the line might not be the same for other people. My diet is informed by my culture, health, experiences and personal feelings - as is everyone’s.

[–] reality_boy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Vegan is a very wide array of things ranging to not eating red meat all the way down to not doing anything that could hurt a plant (only scavengering fallen fruit).

https://theminimalistvegan.com/types-of-vegans-and-vegetarians/

[–] db2@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't forget the ecosexuals.

I'm not making that up, it's apparently a thing.

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago

now that i've read the wikipedia article about them, i prefer to forget the ecosexuals.

[–] DrummyB@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is not at all what Veganism is.

Veganism is LITERALLY an ethical stance regarding exploiting/harming/killing non-human animals.

Finding a random blog online that states otherwise means nothing. Anyone who ate a salad last Tuesday these days thinks they can simply decide what Veganism is.

THIS is the actual definition of Veganism, directly from the people who coined the term:

“Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."