this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2025
498 points (99.6% liked)

World News

38201 readers
510 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 141 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah. That's just called "murder", then.

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 63 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's murder either way. Even if they were drug smugglers, that is not something worth killing.

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even if they were worth killing it'd still be murder

[–] Wrufieotnak@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

Yes, what I meant is more that in case of an imminent terrorist attack, I would deem it okay to kill somebody if it saves the life's of other people and no other less lethal method was sure to stop the attack.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 77 points 1 week ago

It's murder and terrorism even if they were positively identifying drug traffickers.

[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So, they're terrorists...right?

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago (2 children)

That depends. Is this still the definition of the word?

[–] fushuan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 week ago

Those people are civilians of other countries... Either they are as individuals terrorists or US is at war with Venezuela. Take your pick.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

conservapedia page: “this page has been edited 84 times in the past year”

[–] muffedtrims@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago

Not sure which "they're" you're referring to, but of them already claimed they are.

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 62 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

The lawmaker pointed to the Pentagon's admission to explain why the Trump administration "could not actually hold or try the individuals that survived one of the attacks is because they could not satisfy the evidentiary burden."

Call me old fashioned, but I'm of the opinion that if you don't have the evidence to try someone, you definitely don't have the evidence to execute them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Tarquinn2049@lemmy.world 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Giving random people the death penalty, for maybe or maybe not committing a crime that even if it turns out they were, doesn't even qualify for the death penalty in either the country they are from or the country that is killing them... is so far beyond crazy... it shouldn't have been able to happen once, let alone keep happening.

And if that wasn't crazy enough, people that survive the strikes, can't be legally brought in because the burden of proof isn't met to even question them... but killing them is happening?

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's a war crime to execute suspected drug smugglers, or even to execute instead of trial someone found in possession of a large amount of drugs. There is no possible identification of anyone on board or even boat owner from high altitude.

Furthermore, many of the strikes are on speedboats that are going fast enough to plane over the water. It is impossible for any boat to go that fast with enough fuel to get to Florida, and the open cockpit boats themselves look obviously empty. This is simply, provably, pure terrorist evil.

[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

pedantics here, wouldn't that be a crime against humanity, rather than a war crime, since we're not at war?

The rules of war do not stop just because Congress didn't authorize the action.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So where does just possibly probably bombing innocent civilian vessels fall there?

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 34 points 1 week ago

That is called terrorism.

[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Other countries should just start bombing american yatchs and private jets. They're much more likely to contain drugs.

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so … the same accuracy as our “precision drone strikes” then …

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 week ago

So, we're just indiscriminately bombing fishing trawlers, got it.

[–] Flickerby@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

So correct me if I'm wrong but this is just them openly admitting to bombing boats they have no confirmed ID on? Isn't that a problem for THEIR (the deceased's) government? "Foreign government is performing extra judicial killings on my citizens"?

[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

The US is begging Venezuela for a reason to invade right now. Any military retaliation by Venezuela would result in an invasion.

[–] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 week ago

it's obviously a provocation, but Venezuela can't do much about it.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, no shit Sherlock. There are more illegal drugs on a billionaire's yacht than a 25 foot Boston Whaler.

[–] PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

More illegal drugs in the white house than on these boats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Even if they were 100% certain of who they were, murdering people over drugs is fucking insane. If they're in your territory and you want to arrest them and put them through the justice system, okay, but just straight up killing them is evil.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago

Duterte is currently awaiting trial at the Hague for doing exactly this in his own country.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Torpedoing the prop blades or disabling the engine to interdict and board is something the Coasties practice regularly for drug missions, we know how to shoot to disable and to kill. Blowing up the whole boat is straight up murder

[–] brownsugga@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wow those Epstein files must really be something. The homies are ready to WWIII us to distract from the coverup.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yeah, that's not what's happening

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

How long before the cartels start kidnapping US citizens and forcing them under duress onto fast boats?

How long til the US Govt starts blowing them away anyway?

[–] cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

how long until cartels

Dunno. Don't think they're using these boats. The whole point of smuggling is that it's covert, you know?

how long until the us government

Exactly as long as it takes them to ejaculate at the thought. Maybe twelve seconds?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 10 points 1 week ago

The reports say most smuggling is through containerships and air travel. Attacking the little boats is mostly bullying where violence is the point.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Killing US citizens has never been a big deal for the US govt.

[–] Jumbie@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago

Especially lately.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I demand we bomb boats in Venezuela to stem the tide of fentanyl trucked in from Mexico via China!!!

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

I demand we bomb boats in Venezuela to stem the tide of fentanyl trucked in from Mexico via China!!!

CIA:

[–] AnnaFrankfurter@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago

I wonder what will Trump and his cronies will do if Venezuela had attacked US boats.

[–] wurzelgummidge@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago

Mileikowsky says it's okay to do that

Vibe based justice

[–] nucleative@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not long until the boats start shooting back

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago

The ships in question don't even see the US warships. Let that sink in.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 week ago (4 children)

WHERE WAS ALL THIS OUTRAGE WHEN OBAMA WAS DRONE KILLING HALF THE PLANET?

OBAMA WAS THE FIRST PRESIDENT TO KILL A US CITIZEN ON US SOIL WITHOUT A TRIAL. NO OUTRAGE.

THE LAST TEN PRESIDENTS, AT LEAST, WERE WAR CRIMINALS. NO OUTRAGE

NOW THAT IT'S OUT IN THE OPEN YOU HAVE A PROBLEM WITH IT?

HAVE THE DAY YOU CONTINUE TO VOTE FOR AND ACCEPT WILLINGLY LIKE GOOD LITTLE PEASANTS.

[–] fort_burp@feddit.nl 17 points 1 week ago

The same thought keeps occurring to me: "White America is just finding out that America is fascist."

No outrage for the firehoses, the dogs... they think the Keystone pipeline protest was just a fluke.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

NO OUTRAGE.

Just an outright lie but OK. Obama hasn't been president for a decade.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›