this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2025
812 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

27113 readers
1035 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago

Why is nobody commenting on the phone battery?

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Based Tsoding

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 96 points 1 week ago (6 children)

You gotta admit though, Haskell is crazy good for parsing and marshaling data

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Yes. I'm divided into "hum... 100 lines is larger than I expected" and "what did he mean 'from scratch'? did he write the parser combinators? if so, 100 lines is crazy small!"

But I'm settling in believing 80 of those lines are verbose type declarations.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You could probably write a very basic parser combinator library, enough to parse JSON, in 100 lines of Haskell

[–] someacnt@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

Judging by the Parser newtype, he did.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

I decided to write it myself for fun. I decided that "From Scratch" means:

  • No parser libraries (parsec/happy/etc)
  • No using read from Prelude
  • No hacky meta-parsing

Here is what I came up with (using my favourite parsing method: parser combinators):

import Control.Monad ((>=>), replicateM)
import Control.Applicative (Alternative (..), asum, optional)
import Data.Maybe (fromMaybe)
import Data.Functor (($>))
import Data.List (singleton)
import Data.Map (Map, fromList)
import Data.Bifunctor (first, second)
import Data.Char (toLower, chr)

newtype Parser i o = Parser { parse :: i -> Maybe (i, o) } deriving (Functor)

instance Applicative (Parser i) where
  pure a = Parser $ \i -> Just (i, a)
  a <*> b = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, f) -> second f <$> parse b i
instance Alternative (Parser i) where
  empty = Parser $ const Nothing
  a <|> b = Parser $ \i -> parse a i <|> parse b i
instance Monad (Parser i) where
  a >>= f = Parser $ parse a >=> \(i, b) -> parse (f b) i
instance Semigroup o => Semigroup (Parser i o) where
  a <> b = (<>) <$> a <*> b
instance Monoid o => Monoid (Parser i o) where
  mempty = pure mempty

type SParser = Parser String

charIf :: (a -> Bool) -> Parser [a] a
charIf cond = Parser $ \i -> case i of
  (x:xs) | cond x -> Just (xs, x)
  _ -> Nothing

char :: Eq a => a -> Parser [a] a
char c = charIf (== c)

one :: Parser i a -> Parser i [a]
one = fmap singleton

str :: Eq a => [a] -> Parser [a] [a]
str = mapM char

sepBy :: Parser i a -> Parser i b -> Parser i [a]
sepBy a b = (one a <> many (b *> a)) <|> mempty

data Decimal = Decimal { mantissa :: Integer, exponent :: Int } deriving Show

data JSON = Object (Map String JSON) | Array [JSON] | Bool Bool | Number Decimal | String String | Null deriving Show

whitespace :: SParser String
whitespace = many $ asum $ map char [' ', '\t', '\r', '\n']

digit :: Int -> SParser Int
digit base = asum $ take base [asum [char c, char (toLower c)] $> n | (c, n) <- zip (['0'..'9'] <> ['A'..'Z']) [0..]]

collectDigits :: Int -> [Int] -> Integer
collectDigits base = foldl (\acc x -> acc * fromIntegral base + fromIntegral x) 0

unsignedInteger :: SParser Integer
unsignedInteger = collectDigits 10 <$> some (digit 10)

integer :: SParser Integer
integer = asum [char '-' $> (-1), char '+' $> 1, str "" $> 1] >>= \sign -> (sign *) <$> unsignedInteger

-- This is the ceil of the log10 and also very inefficient
log10 :: Integer -> Int
log10 n
  | n < 1 = 0
  | otherwise = 1 + log10 (n `div` 10)

jsonNumber :: SParser Decimal
jsonNumber = do
  whole <- integer
  fraction <- fromMaybe 0 <$> optional (str "." *> unsignedInteger)
  e <- fromIntegral . fromMaybe 0 <$> optional ((str "E" <|> str "e") *> integer)
  pure $ Decimal (whole * 10^log10 fraction + signum whole * fraction) (e - log10 fraction)

escapeChar :: SParser Char
escapeChar = char '\\'
  *> asum [
    str "'" $> '\'',
    str "\"" $> '"',
    str "\\" $> '\\',
    str "n" $> '\n',
    str "r" $> '\r',
    str "t" $> '\t',
    str "b" $> '\b',
    str "f" $> '\f',
    str "u" *> (chr . fromIntegral . collectDigits 16 <$> replicateM 4 (digit 16))
  ]

jsonString :: SParser String
jsonString =
  char '"'
  *> many (asum [charIf (\c -> c /= '"' && c /= '\\'), escapeChar])
  <* char '"'

jsonObjectPair :: SParser (String, JSON)
jsonObjectPair = (,) <$> (whitespace *> jsonString <* whitespace <* char ':') <*> json

json :: SParser JSON
json =
  whitespace *>
    asum [
      Object <$> fromList <$> (char '{' *> jsonObjectPair `sepBy` char ',' <* char '}'),
      Array <$> (char '[' *> json `sepBy` char ',' <* char ']'),
      Bool <$> asum [str "true" $> True, str "false" $> False],
      Number <$> jsonNumber,
      String <$> jsonString,
      Null <$ str "null"
    ]
    <* whitespace

main :: IO ()
main = interact $ show . parse json

This parses numbers as my own weird Decimal type, in order to preserve all information (converting to Double is lossy). I didn't bother implementing any methods on the Decimal, because there are other libraries that do that and we're just writing a parser.

It's also slow as hell but hey, that's naive implementations for you!

It ended up being 113 lines. I think I could reduce it a bit more if I was willing to sacrifice readability and/or just inline things instead of implementing stdlib typeclasses.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Jokes on her, I've transitioned since last Christmas.

[–] Fisherswamp@programming.dev 80 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can still bring a girl though

[–] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 days ago

Mission failed successfully: I'm bringing my enby instead and you can't stop me.

[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 60 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I am the girl! Hmm, but maybe I'll bring another one too? 🤔

[–] bhamlin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 74 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who needs a girl when you have monads to keep you warm?

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 week ago

Or become a girl with gonads

[–] tiramichu@sh.itjust.works 56 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No mom, I'm gonna BE a girl for Christmas. puts on programming socks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] yetAnotherUser@lemmy.ca 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You just need to find a girl that also likes Tsoding! Then, you can ask her "Hey, do you have plans for Christmas? I'd love it if we could do AoC (Advent of Code) in a language we both hate!"

[–] Gumbyyy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Well shit, I've never seen AoC before - I'm not usually very interested in programming just for fun, but I might give that a try!

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 35 points 1 week ago (5 children)

There are far more male programmers... As a programmer, be gay or stay alone... Choose!

[–] psud@aussie.zone 4 points 6 days ago

It's odd in the Australian public service, with COBOL programmers. They've been in the job long enough that they started when the public service was the only employer who would employ women as programmers. I'm on the systems analyst side of the fence, the programmers I have worked with include a bit more than 60% women

I think all the programmers I know are married or gay or not interested. I think the gay ones are mostly married too.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh that explains why my wife is gay

[–] mathemachristian@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If she was around the same cs students as me then yeah

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

She sleeps with men, that's pretty gay

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 30 points 1 week ago

There are a lot of things she does but that aint one of them

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] undefined@lemmy.hogru.ch 22 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Can programmers only be with other programmers or am I missing something?

[–] fibojoly@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

Well yeah, obv. But not enough girls in computer science, so like the fishes, some of them magically turn into girls after a while.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"JSON parser 100% from scratch in Haskell in 110 lines" doesn't get you horny? I guess some people are just wired differently.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 11 points 1 week ago

But you kind of have to leave the house for that... I mean... We talk about programmers....

/s

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There are those who transition, so a significant chunk of that male programmer population is "male" as in quotation marks, only that some transition earlier than others. Does not guarantee that you can get the transgender autistic puppygirl (or other variations) of your dreams, since many of them are lesbians.

But also feel free to look outside your field for a partner. It's okay to date an artist as a programmer.

[–] andioop@programming.dev 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Feels weird reading this as the only single woman programmer in my friend group who likes men

[–] rucksack@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think programmer should be seen as a gender itself.

I'm currently transitioning myself, already have a homeserver and a Linux PC, can't wait to be a real programmer.

[–] lessthanluigi@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 week ago

I detransitioned from being a programmer and all I have is depression since, maybe I should retransission into being a programmer

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 week ago

It's not gay if I'm wearing programming socks.

[–] Cevilia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This kind of text hits differently when you're a lesbian.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wouldn’t it hit the same as it would a straight male?

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

POV: Not all moms are accepting of their daughters being into girls.

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 28 points 1 week ago (6 children)
[–] gigastasio@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

NOTE: no proper error reporting

Add those few lines, will ya?

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But that would break the 111 line rule.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 week ago

I don't think "programmer" fully captures the reality of being an emacs-based programmer.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 18 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 16 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't trust a guy letting their battery go that low either

[–] gigachad@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (4 children)

A JSON parser in Haskell, what a day to have eyes

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm a girl. I'm not interested in Haskell, that's too frigging endofunctiorific. Erlang! That's what all the cool guys are doing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

He won't be done debugging her by then. She'll be ready for beta testing next year.

[–] bestelbus22@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Hello everyone, and welcome to yet another recreational programming session with who?

load more comments
view more: next ›