news

Wow so you're telling me that this whole fucking time all it took was for the president to make a single post on social media to stop this? And Biden could have just had some idiot staffer do it for him? THIS WHOLE FUCKING TIME? Wow who could have seen this coming

If Ukrainian mercs can be in Sudan Putin really needs to strengthen his attacks

Hopefully they can liberate El Fasher, I've seen some brutal shit coming out of there, specifically this drone strike on a mosque during prayer time

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp8wzzjze8xo

The Israelis aren't too happy about Trump's reponse.

"How desperate is Trump for a Nobel Prize on a scale from one to tweeting this nonsense?" — News of Israel.

“President Trump calls on Israel to stop the attacks in the Gaza Strip, he has fallen into the trap of Hamas statement." — Israeli Channel 14.

"Trump sold Israel for a Nobel candidacy." — Yino News on Channel 14.

"This is completely crazy. Trump states: Israel must stop bombing Gaza immediately. Hamas is ready for peace based on the response they gave us." — Israeli Channel 12.

"For the first time since the start of the war, the US does not accept the principle of negotiating under fire." — Yaron Avraham of Israeli Channel 12.

"We were always alone." — Hillel Biton Rosen of Israeli Channel 14

"The tables have turned on us." — Hadashot.

"The state's leadership remains silent after Trump's response." — Ma'ariv.

"After Netanyahu succeeded in introducing amendments to the Trump plan, the Arab states achieve a new tactical victory, and this plan as a whole is turned into a state of radical change. Trump distorts the reputation of Israel, which cannot currently say that Hamas's response is unacceptable to it." — Israeli Channel 11.

Source

Apparently, even officials close to Netanyahu are saying that he was 'surprised' by Trump's response.

Source

He really wants that Nobel Peace Prize

Trump temporarily disrupting the ongoing Zionist offensive in Gaza City in order to attempt formal negotiations would be positive, but I'm not holding my breath

Last time he got pows released, the bombing commenced the second he was out

I think Trump is under serious pressure from the Gulf states. The US can't let Zionist ambitions get in the way of their greater goal of continued domination of the Middle East.

The final deal will probably still suck for the resistance, but I think there's a chance it could really happen this time.

Tbh not so sure about that mass immigration even on paper, In the US the possible BS-PhDs that could go for it, but they're not likely to immigrate out since 1. lack money and 2. language and 3. for a good deal of them despite being personally beaten senseless by the invisible cudgel of the market still fall for typical F tier agency propaganda. Now, I think this applies a lot to the west at large, global south 0 clue so, but I still get the sense a lot of the whole concept of this opening the floodgates is overstated though the econ anxiety will be there until the economy evolves properly.

There's probably going to be a huge steam investment and push sometime in the future I figure, must be getting all the workers to power it in place and local talent isn't enough and maybe there's a plan for a more international expansion in the future, ex more fine semiconductor factories to think of an obvious one.

To survive China ended its more „disruptive“ revolutionary characteristics such as internationalism, especially post gang of four, then the long years of the socialist nadir sanded off those revolutionary characteristics in its populace. Its not an enviable position to be in for the Chinese vanguard.

A wish for economic sovereignty is required for global south nations, but the very same ideology does provide groundcover for less than ideal attitudes about other nations. The conservatism with socialist aesthetics, which is ideology the revisionist forces like russia promote doesn’t seem to help that situation.

Have you seen how Indians have built an entire industry of “fake qualifications” to game the Western immigration system?” -

Ironically this is exactly the same propaganda levelled at the sneaky chinese who are ontologically predisposed towards cheating, "cheating is chinese culture, they cheat at everything!"

Nonetheless, the actual reasons are not important. What is interesting, and scary, is the overreaction against the perceived “threat” of mass immigration, which was likely a culmination of a combination of factors, including the precariousness of the average people who are anxious about the unstable job market and economic uncertainty, being persistently fed with widespread viral content that propagate the most uncharitable stereotype about other countries, as well as the intensifying antagonism between the sexes as less and less people are interested in settling down to raise a family.

The country has been isolationist forever and has made almost no effort to spread internationalism. This attitude is not actually that surprising amongst its population when its leadership have an international attitude of keeping to themselves. The population are only mirroring what the official chinese policy on international engagement is.

If the state's official line is zero solidarity with the international working class then the population holding zero solidarity with the international working class is to be expected.

But - is that making your life easier?

Lmao. The Maoist argumentation is wrong because it deliberately misses the forest for the trees in a facile "but what have the Romans done for me?" style of argumentation that Chinese online rhetoric often have this rather peculiarly unique characteristic of framing as if they're the first people in history to try such a sophistic stunt. China has objectively in all parameters gone through the greatest collective mass poverty alleviation campaign in human history. The Economist, RAND, The Atlantic all have articles where they admit this with gritted teeth yet you can't even say the same about Chinese Maoist/Ultra/Libs, which is interesting. I've lately come to understand this style of Socratic-aping Chinese rhetorical style much better after discovering Chinese Maoist forums like v2.redchinacn.org, which has incidentally gone off the deep end with Kirk apologia recently.

In any case, the anti-immigration sentiment is simply a continuation of the same movement from 2020, where online backlash quashed the Chinese permanent residency reform project. Similarly, this K visa initiative is essentially a second attempt that follows in the footsteps of that 2020 draft proposal which aimed at: "China would formally expand the pool of immigrants that could qualify for P.R. to a still select but larger group of high-income or highly educated long-term migrants." K visa would be the 0.5 version, where the goal is merely to get visa holders rather than broach the subject of permanent residency.

There's a decent article in Routledge's Journal of Contemporary China analyzing that episode though it has the typical "they have nationalists, we have patriots" sort of academic orientalism. The author notes the typical emotionally-overwrought sort of nakedly manipulative discourse that is profuse on the Chinese internet being used: "As a Han Chinese, I am crying softly,"; "I am here! 1.4 billion compatriots are here! As a Chinese, if it is necessary, there will be action on May 4!"

Beyond that kind of nonsense, the actual substantive objections that the author summarizes are the same ones being reused five years later against this K visa initiative.

The draft regulations to many seemed to fit in a tradition of the state privileging foreign nationals, at a time when domestic employment and residential conditions for many Chinese citizens are considered far from adequate. Attracting larger numbers of immigrants to aid China’s development, also sounds inappropriate to some, given China’s recent history of government-enforced family planning. Some suggest revising the regulations to eliminate any loopholes for so-called ‘low-quality’ migrants and to include guarantees that P.R. holders would not be privileged over local Chinese.

Part of the contradiction is that these foreign workers are predominantly drawn to major urban locations like Shanghai known both for their Chinese liberal population and their deluded "I am a global citizen" type of multinational suit wearing capitalists. Both groups ideologically would favor foreign workers of select demographics and this creates the sort of imagery of privilege that provokes this sort of backlash, though it should be said that the Chinese online vocal minority commentariat often has this sort of self-orientalizing narcissism that assumes all other 1.4 billion people in their country are a hive mind that secretly share their personal political opinion, if only but for the dastardly Weibo censors preventing their posts' true updoot numbers from coming to light, as seen by the cited "I am here! 1.4 billion compatriots are here!" style of comments.

Another one of the issues is the typical catch-22 associated with most socialist governments, which is that they are overly sensitive of their Western-propaganda maligned depiction as "repressive authoritarian regimes" which makes them excessively petrified by accusations of "authoritarianism" through alleged governmental overreach, rendering them particularly indecisive and obsequious in instances when they ought to be standing their ground and demonstrating some faith in their governing mandate and legitimacy. This makes socialist governments exceptionally vulnerable to groups that are aware of this contradiction and then deliberately take advantage of it. This is how the 2020 PR draft was shut down. This is how the "white paper" Shanghai lib protesters are credited with "ending" Zero Covid, as if they weren't always a minority and the vast majority of people by all accounts silently still tolerated the policy.

In 20th century socialist states, this was how the DDR failed to react to the Berlin Wall breach debacle, totally capitulating to the BRD in spite of most East German citizens preferring a negotiated union rather than the total annexation by the West as it happened in reality. It was also how the CPSU (or what was left of it) tolerated the illegal secession of the Baltics and why the August putschists spinelessly dithered in 1991. Incidentally, the 1989 Tiananmen failed counter-revolution was the only major time a socialist government stood their ground against this sort of issue and that decision is why the People's Republic still exists today.

Overall, it’s actually good for the xenophobia to make itself plain, because that’s the only way it can be ever addressed in the first place. While socialist states have promoted societal internationalist values of tolerance, we saw how easily they were subverted following the fall of those states. Superficial tolerance led to Khrushchev blathering about how the USSR "solved the nationality issue." In the DDR, this gave way to Neo-Nazis and the AfD; in the USSR, this gave way to ethnic pogroms in the 90s and the current disastrous state of the former Soviet world. China has the privilege of those types outing themselves while the socialist state still holds power so it will be interesting to see if they concede once again to the vocal minority on this matter or push ahead forward.

What's mostly disappointing from reading all this is the clear failure of Chinese socialist ideology in translating into proletarian internationalism. When you have a supposedly socialist society bitching about muh immigrants you have failed in trying to create solidarity between working class peoples.

This likely explains why the Chinese government has no intention of helping liberation or socialist struggles around the world (ie Gaza). The civil society in China don't really care that much any more than what the rest of the people in the world already do.

I assume this is a maneuver to make a visible show of peace, and letting Trump feel he is in within reach of that Nobel, so that Israel will have to cross Trump in order to resume violence. Maybe the plan is to go ahead and release the hostages on the assumption that without that casus belli, Israel will have less room to resume violence between Trump and the other Western leaders.

Not a bad gambit I suppose, and I largely trust Hamas’ judgement as they have shown good judgement so far… but I think that while Israel does not dictate policy to the US, it does seem that Netanyahu ultimately gets his way with Trump after they talk in person.

But I do feel strongly that accepting the 20 point plan would have been the beginning of the end of the resistance is Gaza.