this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
297 points (97.7% liked)

Fuck AI

4175 readers
955 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dwayne_Elizondo_Mountain_Dew_Camacho@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

This is really gonna be big in ~~the Metaverse~~ Horizon Worlds.

[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 9 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Has there been any good consumer Ai products yet? I keep seeing all these products in search of a problem.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

A few developers I know are very impressed by Claude.

I, too, can copy and paste from StackOverflow.

[–] tfm@piefed.europe.pub 4 points 7 hours ago

Besides improving grammar in emails, no, not really

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Do they have an AI program that filters out AI content yet? That might be good.

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

so... if we're going to have AI-generated content, consumed by bots... and then that's going to be summarized with engagement metrics... why don't we cut out the middleman and just generate the metrics?

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 10 points 9 hours ago

Dead Internet theory

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 37 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Why would I bother watching content nobody bothered making?

[–] Sergio@piefed.social 6 points 10 hours ago

Because your AI companions will want to talk about it tomorrow.

[–] tfm@piefed.europe.pub 11 points 12 hours ago

Because you want to see those spicy AI ads in between the AI posts?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Alternativeto does articles now?

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

For the longest time

[–] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 hours ago

More brainrot.

Stop using populat social media.

[–] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 53 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine someone staring, smiling dumbly at an endless stream of fake kitten videos.

Truly a life without meaning

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 28 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Old people. Old people will. I've seen them do this in libraries and what they share on FB.

[–] Junkers_Klunker@feddit.dk 3 points 12 hours ago

And children. They will too, at least until they’re old enough to see difference.

[–] fantasyocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hear me out, I wouldn't mind if Google did the same thing with YouTube. That way all the ai slop would be in one feed I can ignore and I can just go back to watching gunpla build videos on autoplay.

[–] lemmy_outta_here@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

They already did something like that with YouTube Sharts; won’t bother me if they mix in some slop.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 64 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (3 children)

I almost reflexively downvoted this because the news pisses me off so much, before I stopped myself because it's unfair to shoot the messenger.

If you're someone who actually believes AI-generated content can be good, why is this even necessary‽ Surely the AI stuff will just naturally rise to the top on YouTube Shorts, TikTok, and Instagram Reels. Is that not happening? I wonder why...

Gotta hand it to Meta though, that is actually a brilliant name for the product.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 23 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

No, but there's simply an "infinite" amount of ML slop, therefore it's easier to keep viewers longer.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

But that's my point. Put the AI slop on YouTube. If it's actually good enough to effect greater viewer retention, it'll work and the algorithm will feed more of it than human-created content. No need for a specific platform.

This feels like management said "we have AI, we need to build more AI-based products, what've ya got?"

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

But there are boatloads of slop already on YouTube, and the algorithm doesn't care if you like or dislike it. People will put a dislike and a mean comment but the algorithm sees that as engagement and the slop wins.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 2 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

Is there genuinely a bunch of AI on YouTube? I watch a lot of content on there, and I don't think I've ever been recommended an AI generated video.

Obviously I've had my account for a while, so they've got a good idea of what I like to watch.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 14 hours ago

Pretty easy to spot them if you're looking for history related stuff that's not common, like African kingdoms during the early medieval period or even some Mesoamerican studies - it may start off with real images, but soon it's only AI slop and that's when you realize even the voice might be AI. I fell for 2 such videos thus far.

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, in particular music and "fake trailers".

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 2 points 15 hours ago

They invested billions into AI. It has to work or they lose a lot of money and the shareholders shan't be pleased.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Maybe it will be good in the future, who knows, but it sure is shit now so why try to shove it down our throats if it isn't to do some dark pattern crap with it.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago

The attempt at co-opting AAVE is so pathetic and yet so on brand for fuckerberg and his sycophants.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 17 hours ago

Zuck wants this because presumably his synth brain can't tell the difference.

[–] Tartas1995@discuss.tchncs.de 26 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I am excited for this platform. It is the best way to show the last person that people don't want ai slop. Make it flop and every investor has to consider thia failure in their delusions.

[–] kadu@scribe.disroot.org 13 points 16 hours ago

Zuck will do the same thing he's been doing on Facebook and Threads: fill the entire site with bots and count those as real accounts when talking to investors. Will artificially inflate the numbers.

[–] hushable@lemmy.world 11 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

mmw they'll just merge that functionally into instagram eventually

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 15 hours ago

And nothing will change.

[–] BluePea@piefed.social 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Great, ipad kids will now be able to watch ai generated slop on a dedicated environment...

[–] tfm@piefed.europe.pub 1 points 12 hours ago

It's going to be a dark future.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 31 points 20 hours ago

Great headline