this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2025
317 points (97.3% liked)

Fuck AI

4175 readers
1057 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
VerbFlow@lemmy.world
MrMcGasion@lemmy.world
TootSweet@lemmy.world
BigMikeInAustin@lemmy.world
cynar@lemmy.world
drmeanfeel@lemmy.world
pavnilschanda@lemmy.world
CriticalMedicine@lemmy.world
WonderfulWanderer@lemmy.world
Communist@lemmy.ml
eatCasserole@lemmy.world
SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world
NutWrench@lemmy.world
Soup@lemmy.cafe
iAvicenna@lemmy.world
Tinks@lemmy.world
wizblizz@lemmy.world
corus_kt@lemmy.world
Prandom_returns@lemm.ee
TrickDacy@lemmy.world
TheFriar@lemm.ee
HawlSera@lemm.ee
andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
MeDuViNoX@sh.itjust.works
33550336@lemmy.world
Nougat@fedia.io
Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
Quill7513@slrpnk.net
glowing_hans@sopuli.xyz
e8d79@discuss.tchncs.de
ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social
317
Meta launches 'Vibes,' a new short-video feed of AI-generated content nobody asked for (alternativeto.net)
submitted 23 hours ago by tfm@piefed.europe.pub to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DevoidWisdom@sh.itjust.works 10 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

Has there been any good consumer Ai products yet? I keep seeing all these products in search of a problem.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

Is there any smaller, "semantic search"-oriented model, rather than all the coding agents?

[–] lapping6596@lemmy.world 2 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Coderabbit for PR reviews at work has both impressed me and made me aggregated by how incorrect some of the comments are. It's like, it's caught bugs that i would have missed even when looking very closely but also makes the same suggestions to over complicate chunks or suggestions that literally don't work. Such as assuming the db schema when looking at a query and saying "that's not what the column is called".

So, that's best I've experienced really, basically a PR check that's able to find some really out there bugs but a lot of comments need to be ignored.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 18 minutes ago

Yeah you need to review the PR review instead lol

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

I think Adobe's new generative fill is supposed to be pretty good? It's just a more complicated version of their much older content-aware fill.

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

A few developers I know are very impressed by Claude.

[–] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 17 minutes ago

It works well for small programs and boilerplate. But you need to know what you are doing to guide it. They can very often get stuck in some rabbithole

[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 7 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I, too, can copy and paste from StackOverflow.

[–] TomArrr@lemmy.world 1 points 17 minutes ago

Yes, but you'll know if you're copying from the answer, or the question.

[–] kogasa@programming.dev 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Even if that were literally what it did, having a StackOverflow button would be pretty cool

[–] tfm@piefed.europe.pub 4 points 9 hours ago

Besides improving grammar in emails, no, not really

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Do they have an AI program that filters out AI content yet? That might be good.