kadu

You went out of your way to tell someone that if they find llms used full it means they are stupid

Yes.

and not as good as you

That I did not say nor agree with.

But now that your argument doesn’t hold any water

Nothing you said disproved anything about "my argument" but sure.

Cool, go use LLMs. Not sure why you're expecting validation from me, I'll never be impressed by your inability to handle basic tasks and attempt at delegating them to a predictive text generator. I can't do anything about your choices, nor do I care about your lack of skill.

Ah fuck, I've read your comment so now the Nintendo lawyers are knocking on my door

It just means you suck at prompting, which is basically just talking and explaining what you need

I suck at prompting? I didn't write the dozens of papers showing the limitations of LLMs, my guy.

Yep, sugarcane polymers are amazing. They can be made to dissolve quickly or last a little longer, depending on your needs. Technically they could be used as full packaging for chips and bread and similar foods.

openWRT is fantastic and does indeed give you full control over your router... but not your modem. Modems are a complete mess of patents and proprietary software that nobody can control but a select number of companies.

Your joke would work better against the guy boasting about using LLMs, not the one actively avoiding them. Maybe ask a LLM for an explanation as to why.

Google's approach to collecting more user data was launching a "free" service tied to it. Want to read their emails? Gmail. Want their files? Drive. How about every photo they take? Google Photos.

Looks like OpenAI wants to skip the "deliver a real product" step and just straight up ask for your data lol

That's not what I said.

LLMs are demonstrably bad at what they do, and what they do is just very basic writing, research and math.

It's not about things I know or don't know. If you're finding LLMs useful, you're lacking in some foundational skills that everybody should practice and be capable of doing.