While I get that yes it's often a money grab, especially when it's a remaster of a game that's less than 10 years old (sometimes less than 5 years), there are times where it's completely valid and justifiable.

Let's just look at the very recent Trails in the Sky 1st Chapter release. Yeah we could probably just call this a remake, but in this case it's such a faithful recreation of the original, it's like playing that original all over again. But this fixes the accessibility issue this first trilogy has in that the only way to play it in English is either: PSP, Vita, or 2014 PC release. No modern console can play it, and it's a very important story arc. Now us rabid Trails fans can pretty unanimously say where the best starting point of the series is.

I am in my 50s and I've missed a couple of decades of games - stopped gaming in the days of vice city and just started again recently when I got a steam deck. There's a pretty big backlog of stuff that people highly recommend, but remasters and remakes offer me the opportunity to play these games with modern graphics. For someone who grew up with 8 bit graphics the stuff we can do these days is amazing and I want to enjoy games that are also good to look at. Recently finished bioshock remaster, enjoyed it immensely. So yeah, while it's probably better for studios to focus on creating new stuff, there are people who enjoy the old stuff updated.

I just stopped caring.

Was funny watching everyone buy the Oblivion remaster and put it down 3 days later as I predicted.

I'll stick with indifference thanks, hate isn't worth the energy

The video starts by showing a side by side of original Arkham Asylum and Return to Arkham Asylum, talking about how the remaster ruined the art style. At first, they're unlabeled, and I thought, "Oh yeah, that sucks, that is a bit worse." Then they labeled them, and the one I thought looked better was the remaster. What's more is I've only ever played the original PC release of Arkham Asylum, one of my favorite games, and the remaster looks the way I remember Arkham Asylum looking.

I show my hate by not purchasing them.

I'm gonna go on record and defend the Deus Ex remaster. There's no way to play it on modern hardware. The only game console that can run it is the PS2, and not even then. The PS2 version was a whole other game because DX1 was too powerful for consoles. So it was basically DX1 dumbed down. Maps were smaller, everything was reduced... it was like a "de-make".

You can run it on Windows PCs with some tweaking, but if you don't have a computer with spyware, you can jump through bigger hoops. Linux has Proton. On my Macs I can do it with Whisky. It's really not hard, but I did need a third party tool called Deus Exe because the original DeusEx.exe was a complete no-go. I think it was made for Windows 98? Anyway, once I got Deus Exe up and running, I was even able to run Shifter, which was a mod for DX1 that tightened a few things up and added "legendary" versions of each weapon to various places around the world. I actually ran a mod of the mod, one I made myself that had more hacks to the game, like you could update your cyber link to rifle range, i.e. to use computers from across the room. Like V can do in Cyberpunk. Except DX1 wasn't made for that so it was kinda game breaking. But fun. I mean the game was never hard.

Anyway, they're bringing DX1 to Xbox, PlayStation, and Switch. And PC, of course. Hopefully Mac — the developer, Aspyr, has done Mac ports, but they were doing Mac ports of Xbox 360 games when Macs and Xbox 360s used the same PowerPC architecture, so that's kinda cheating. That said, anybody porting to Switch is a stone's throw away from porting to Mac since they're both ARM64, and that's part of why we even have Cyberpunk on the Mac now.

Didn't watch the video, because cba, but remasters have their place if theyre warranted. PS1/N64 era games for instance. Maybe PS2/Xbox.

360/PS3 onwards do not need it.