this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2025
99 points (91.6% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34667 readers
1163 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

There may be an age or generational explanation for this, but I especially notice this behavior on Reddit while not nearly as much here on Lemmy (though maybe that's also a mater of implementation).

It seems many are so quick to assert overly-confident positions, but then hit-and-run with some smarmy remark at even the slightest challenge, then quickly block. Like, not even crazy stuff. Just basic, civil disagreements. I can pretty well predict when it will happen, and it always feels like such a petty ego-sparing fingers-in-ears denial thing to do, and to me if anything shows they were not very confident in their views being challenged.

I think I've only blocked a handful of people over a decade who were actively spamming, stalking, or spewing extremely hateful rhetoric and I just reported them simultaneously. You have to cross a pretty extreme and irrational line for me to do that.

The reason I ask is to see if I'm missing something; to better understand the mindset of those who do.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I have blocked more in the last year than I have in the last 20 combined. There are far, far too many people arguing to troll, arguing in bad faith, threatening, or insulting that will do everything they can to bait you, derail your argument, DM you with insults, etc.

It’s probably because I’ve become far more critical of anti-science, shitty politics, and shitty people, so I’m sure that’s part of the reason, but nonetheless I don’t have the time or patience anymore to waste on the pigeons knocking pieces over and shitting on the chessboard declaring victory, so I block them.

I also have been blocked outright when presenting any objectively factual rebuttal. Facts are often strictly disallowed in the narrative, particularly political and anti-science ones. People don’t want their flow of internet “likes” interrupted.

[–] yermaw@sh.itjust.works 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I need to start blocking people for my own sanity. You tell them the sky is blue, and they'll demand a source. You send them a picture of the sky and they tell you its not a source. You dick about spending 5 minutes of your time finding an actual source because you obviously weren't prepared to defend something so obvious, and they just tell you "pfft [source]. Actually trusting [source] in [thisyear]." It goes on.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Yeah I gave up 'sourcing' anything because nobody will believe sources anymore. They will just tell you the source is wrong.

And if you tell them to look up their own sources, they tell you to f yourself and how it isn't their job its yours.

It's stupidity and entitlement wrapped up into one neat package.

I also love people who tell you what you are staying is a 'fallacy' when it's not. And they really do not care about learning what a fallacy actually is... they just want to use it to call other people wrong even if they totally misunderstand how fallacies work.

They simple do not want to admit fault or mistake or god forbid... learn something new.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

Same man.

I never used to block people on principle... but at the same time people never said horrible shit or harassed me so there really was no reason to.

People also were not posting all sorts of crazy nonsense 10 years ago in the same volume or lever of vitriolic hate they do now.

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

There's this streamer I sort of follow who did some reaction streams to proximitychat videos. If you don't know, it's basically this guy in VRchat who joins public lobbies and trolls the people in there - most of them crazily obsessed with the game and roleplay to the point of basically living in VR.

This guy will be in a public lobby for maybe hours, constantly trolling, and all they do is ask him to stop. Maybe they'll threaten to remove him as a friend (which is such a common occurrence that it might almost seems like capital punishment to these terminally online dweebs), but they almost never kick or block him outright.

In the reaction streams the question is always, why not just kick and block the guy? Sure, don't block everyone who makes an annoying remark outright, but as I said, this guy is in there for hours without seemingly any attempt to actually get him to stop. It seems that the easiest thing is to just talk a bit, find out he's there in bad faith and then block him, but they never do.

What I'm getting at is, people should block more. Not that, again, you should block everyone who slightly annoys you or challenges your viewpoint, but as soon as you find out they are there in bad faith, just block and move on. I feel ancient for saying this but as they say: don't feed the trolls.

[–] lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Blocking is self-care. Just with the added teeth of "get tf out of my phone."

That's it.

It's maintaining your personal peace, and frankly I find it weird that it's even a conversation let alone as stigmatized as it is. People still have a litany of ways to reconnect outside digital. It's literally what people had to do before blocking was a thing.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 1 points 16 hours ago

This logic can be applied to using corporate devices... but i guess it is harder

[–] shaggyb@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Blocking is a VERY GOOD THING.

The internet is a cesspool. You need to curate it.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Only issue I take with this is that the last year has shown us the internet represents living people, even if we put them out of sight.

That said, I don’t exactly know how we “solve” that cesspool.

[–] TubularTittyFrog@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

You don't. It's on other people to fix themselves.

Sadly, they think you're a cesspool too for not agreeing with them. I've noticed my opinions have become super controversial now because I'm not a polarized person. And non-polarized viewpoints are EVIL to anyone who is an extremist, and all the extremists think they are moderates are the only ones who see 'the truth'.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] brygphilomena@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Trolls have no right to any of my time.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] hotdogcharmer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Personally, I block people who espouse things I believe are genuinely spiteful, hateful, or shitty. Generally, I use the block button to "curate" my experience with the intention that I can use Lemmy as brief escapism when I'm in the bathroom or on the train without having my mood affected by somebody posting something shitty.

I don't block anyone for normal disagreements, because I'm a relatively normal adult and as such that sort of thing doesn't bother me.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

I've got better things to do than read a load of horseshit from bad-faith weirdos, so I block them. No point engaging with them and reading their opinions makes my day measurably worse.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

People don't like being forced to engage with belligerent reactionaries.

I'm 31 now but I've always been pretty quick with a block button, i don't mind people disagreeing with me, but some people are just overly aggressive and I find life's better to just not care about them and block.

I also block trolls because you know don't feed the trolls.

[–] Alcyonaria@piefed.world 85 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Life is too short to deal with weirdos treating lemmy as their blog. Some are overzealous but you have to curate your own space on federated platforms

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I constantly block both users and communities on Lemmy. Mostly because they are spouting doomer nonsense, and I ain't got no time for their bullshit.

[–] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

There’s definitely an addicting trend to making people more scared than they should be. News falls to it, individuals seeking attention fall to it too.

[–] dwindling7373@feddit.it 8 points 1 day ago

Quake is better anyway.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For me personally, I just don't feel like dealing with yet another source of garbage that I don't want to read.

In happier times, I felt a different way about blocking. Nowadays, the fucking potus forces the country to match some phony fucking Fox News image, and I don't really care about reading some dumb assholes dumb rant anymore. Not blocking people and "dialog" and "debate bro" shit isn't fixing this crap anyway, so I'm going to go ahead and make my own life contain a little less hassle.

That's also why I'm only really here and on mastodon. I know they're basically left wing safe spaces. I frankly don't give a fuck.

[–] Randomgal@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 day ago

Why would you read someone you don't want to? Why would you use a feature of the platform?

[–] Libb@piefed.social 47 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

I block the moment I realize someone is a troll, or worse. No exception.

Like already mentioned, life is way too short to waste one more second of it with those people desire to be as harmful as they can be or with their constant need for attention and validation.

Edit: typos

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I use it to curate my lemmy experiance. 99% of the users/communities I block aren't for anything personal, they're just clogging up my ALL feed with things I dont care about (for example, sports ball or foreign language comms).

SPORTS BALL!!!!!!!!!!!

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

It depends what you're on (social media) for.

If you're there to get some positive social interaction and read some articles or funny pictures, it completely makes sense to block agitators or regular shitposters.

If you're there to have political arguments and engage with rage bait then you leave everyone unblocked.

Its really not that complicated.

load more comments
view more: next ›