Ok, so... maybe choose to not use it, and choose to not buy games that use it
Games
Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)
Posts.
- News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
- Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
- No humor/memes etc..
- No affiliate links
- No advertising.
- No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
- No self promotion.
- No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
- No politics.
Comments.
- No personal attacks.
- Obey instance rules.
- No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
- Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.
My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.
Other communities:
Ah but that's not how being a gamer works. When the game companies do something sleazy you have to:
-
Complain about it endlessly online
-
Buy the game anyway and play it for 500 hours, stopping occasionally to post online about how terrible it is
-
Buy all the DLC, complain about it being a ripoff and then leave a negative Steam review
Then start saving for the sequel, which will be nowhere near as good as the first game.
- profit
- hivemind
big changes are HARD to come by
I worry that if I shot myself in the leg on purpose, I might bleed out
I used to worry that if I shat myself in the leg on purpose, I might bleed out. i still worry that, but i used to, too.
Yeah.
The 'dreamer' part of me pictures this as enabling solo devs with masterpieces in their heads to finally make the game they want. Or small studios to undermine AAAs even more.
...But grifters gonna grift.
And apparently people buying slop can't help themselves, whether the slop is AI or not.
Ideally, so many of modern technologies would be an incredible net positive, freeing up so much wasted human time and enabling people to pursue happy, fruitful lives. But under capitalism, those same innovations are instead ruining livelihoods, dismantling society, and destroying the ecosystem.
It was already pretty badly ruined because of asset packs.
Whoever uses AI to crank out shit games is already cranking out shit games anyway. Only way to fight back now or in the future is to stop paying for shit games.
I mean, most AAA titles don't even run on launch nowadays, so I'm not really sure how the quality can get much worse than "unplayable."
And the bar was already very low.
Just remember what call of duty calls original content
That's not even the worst of what Call of Duty used.
Is the second to last"finger" the curb?
Still terrible ai tho...
I see extra fingers are not exclusive to 2d images
...don't use it and the problem solves itself, no?
I'm sure that's what they'd like to do but then some executive gets some bright ideas about how it could make the game better despite having never ever played a game before in their life.
Wait, if devs are worried about it, and players are worried about it, who the fuck is doing it?? If it's a widespread fear, they should band together and set up an AI-weary union, and gamers would support the shit outta them for it. Make it like a privacy policy, a binding agreement that AI will be used sparingly if at all.
Wait, if devs are worried about it, and players are worried about it, who the fuck is doing it??
The CEOs and upper management goons that don't care about anything but a single number getting higher.
Just don't buy shitty games.