this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2025
1114 points (99.3% liked)

Microblog Memes

9245 readers
2715 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 47 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Are we also nationalizing the farms?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 24 points 6 days ago

Only the losses!

[–] minkymunkey_7_7@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Next we kill all the birds!

[–] onslaught545@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 days ago
[–] CriticalThought@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Under this plan, would the farms be nationalized, or would people be forced to work for the profit of private farm owners?

[–] Patches@ttrpg.network 35 points 6 days ago

You already know

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Free labor.

Gavin McInnes even said teenagers should be primarily used for this. This will also be the case when you realize how much child labor laws are being removed by Republicans.

[–] TheProtagonist@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Free profits for the agriculture industry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] But_my_mom_says_im_cool@lemmy.world 34 points 6 days ago (1 children)

And they and their rich friends will find a way to pay their way out of it

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

They’ll each own one of the farms, and claim that means they work there every day already.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 27 points 6 days ago

All "right wing" farmers parties are just agrarian socialists with racism and sexism.

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 22 points 6 days ago

As somebody that worked in a cornfield for minimum wage, it sucks. Your feet get heavy with mud, it's hot, the leaves give you "papercuts". One summer is enough to make you never want to do it again.

[–] HalfSalesman@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I arguably hate Maoism the most of all popular authoritarian left ideologies. So it makes sense to me that irredeemably evil and stupid conservatives and fascists would unconsciously like it's policies.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 10 points 6 days ago

AS someone Coming from a farm: Leave us the fuck alone with unskilled workers.

Modern farms are usually optimised to minimise the need for human workers. This means, that those that are needed need certain skills. A lot of the required skills can not be learned in a single year just from working on a farm. The only farming sector that still heavily relies on human workers are farms that produce vegetables. Always having to retrain your entire workforce every single year will cause problems and is not worth it for a lot of farms.

[–] Juice@midwest.social 19 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

Bourgeois conservatives are obsessed with 20th century communism. The billionaire class has had its own vanguard since Prescott Bush. Steve Bannon calls himself a Leninist, though I'm not real sure what he means. The Republican obsession with culture war is influenced by Gramsci and his theory of hegemonic power. And the republican strategy of politically controlling cities through rural areas, as in "the country surrounds the city," is a component of Maoism.

Not saying there is an affinity between far right conservatives and communists, I don't believe that there is one. But 20th century communists' application of dialectical materialism uncovered new political dynamics through their work with the masses, and unfortunately the far right learned many of these lessons, though only as a way to gain power for themselves noy liberation for all; while democrats clung death like to liberal idealism and refused to learn anything from the left, since it is the dems job to oppose and keep power from us.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today 10 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Steve Bannon calls himself a Leninist, though I'm not real sure what he means.

I mean fascist have "socialism" if you consider their party members alone to represent the state. That's why fascist economics can be difficult to grasp for a lot of people, especially capitalists.

Yes the Nazi seized the means of production.... But, the way they did it was by seizing businesses not controlled by the party and then incentivizing loyalty by re-privatizing the businesses back to loyal party members.

People like Bannon cannot see the difference between the people seizing the means of production to serve greater society, and the party seizing the means of production to serve the party itself. To them socialism is when government take business, and that's it.

And the republican strategy of politically controlling cities through rural areas, as in "the country surrounds the city," is a component of Maoism.

I don't really think that's entirely correct considering that the 3/5th compromise was basically set up to do the same thing in America, and the idea of a Senate itself was invented as a way to avoid the same situation early American leaders witnessed in the French revolution.

I think maoism is a bit of a twist on the tradition, as class consciousness in China was fermented in the rural plurality unlike in Western nations which tend to take a more vanguard approach to socialism.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GreenShimada@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They're obsessed with selling the idea of 20th century communism without that label while practicing 19th century robber-baron-ism. They can be kings and gods and then sell everyone else the tools to chase the next ideal. Because ultimately all they have is brand loyalty, fear, and a lack of any other options keeping farmers with them.

Back in 2016 Trey Crowder and 2 other comedian friends wrote a book called the Liberal Redneck Manifesto. As someone that grew up redneck, it was probably the best assessment of the situation in 2016 I've seen so far, and the media missed it 100%. The ultimate lesson is that until it affects the under-educated and they think they chose the alternative, they will continue to act against their own best interests because "That's how it's done." Same exact thing applies to the developing world.

Then J.D. Vance and his stupid book came in and swept the scene with his mediocre drivel that made coastal liberal elites feel like now they understood how Trump won. Still pisses me off how joyously out of touch they were as they fueled the fire that got us here.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)

Fuck it, if we're doing this make customer service the same as well

[–] psoul@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (4 children)

This but for the police force.

Turn the police into something of a militia, 80% made of constituents from that jurisdiction, picked at random à la jury duty (exemptions apply)

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That is a terrible idea. You already see what happens when they’re “trained”.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ILoveUnions@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It's an interesting idea, but a proper police force should consist of trained and capable people (unlike the current states one!), of which random selection will necessarily create it so that many are not.

[–] Ricaz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 6 days ago

As a European I think it's a great idea for USA to enter your proposed perpetual state of civil war

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

*Squints harder*

Ah, slavery.

But schools place way too much emphasis on academic results. You can be the smartest man alive, but you'll still be paying the "school thicko" to fix your toilet.

[–] bizarroland@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

I wonder how quickly they would change their tune if they were also required to pay appropriate wages for the people conscripted to work on their farms.

[–] JangleJack@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That picture looks like a tobacco field, which is a dangerous crop to pick. Americans would quit immediately if forced to pick their own.

[–] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] 1995ToyotaCorolla@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Supposedly an illness called Green Tobacco Sickness can occur from absorbing nicotine in the tobacco leaves along with heat injuries from working in the fields

https://www.osha.gov/green-tobacco-sickness

[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 13 points 6 days ago

LOL, MAGA Communists.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The reds have actually taken over our country.

We need to stop Chairman Trump, the communist who hates America and want to destroy our freedom and our way of life.

(can we just call the MAGAts "communist"? seems like a more potent word in this 21st century red scare era)

[–] Part4@infosec.pub 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (4 children)

What Trump is doing has nothing to do with communism. It is raw naked capitalism, whose end game appears to be oligarchy, aligning itself with fascism rather than accept an egalitarian society in which it has to give up any of its advantage.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

One thing you gotta know about politics, is you have to use "fascism" when your audience is on the left, but for conservatives, "communism" is a much scarier word so you should use that instead. Its basically code-switching in order to get your point across. The average people are too dumb to understand nuances so you have to dumb it down for them to understand.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 7 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Calling a single policy Maoist because it was implemented by the Maoist regime is the same as calling the concept of socialised healthcare a Nazi policy because it was implemented by the Nazi regime.

I neither agree nor disagree with this policy on the basis that I don't know enough about the logistics and implementation to give an informed opinion, but to refer to it as Maoist is glib and incorrect as Malaysia, Zambia and Nigeria already have agricultural national service and, although Malaysia is a communist country, none of them are aligned with the CCP or the Maoist Revolutionary movement.

[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Its basically a parody of how every right leaning idiot calls boring right leaning centrists like Democrats "Extreme Left Communism".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

American citizens can't afford to live on farm wages.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 9 points 6 days ago

Huh. Well what if we built areas with housing and transit cheap enough that farm wages are enough to live on?

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Don't get caught wearing glasses around maga.... Wouldn't wanna get called a "reader"

load more comments
view more: next ›