this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2025
293 points (85.0% liked)

Memes

52383 readers
340 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FreeAZ@sopuli.xyz 46 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Democratic socialism just means you believe in democratically governed socialism, not that you think you can just vote capitalism into socialism. There's both reformist and revolutionary democratic socialists. I both believe in democracy and also see that the only way to overturn capitalism (at least in the US) would be through revolution. All the democratic part means is that they're opposed to monarchies or dictatorships.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 week ago

No. That's incorrect. Democratic socialism is always and has always been an opposite to revolutionary socialism. Read some goddamned books. ALL forms of socialism are democratic, essentially by definition, but certainly by historical precedent. The only undemocratic "socialist" movements have been fascist movements using socialist aesthetics.

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 week ago (13 children)

Are you saying that you can have undemocratic socialism?

[–] Una@europe.pub 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Isn't that what USSR was, dictatorship?

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 1 week ago

Good question. No. It was not. Please read about it. There is plenty of writing about the political structure of the USSR, its constitutional documents, its legal and court systems, etc. It is imminently possible for you to learn about it if you're curious

[–] Confidant6198@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago (33 children)

Dictatorship of the proletariat is democracy for the people

[–] KumaSudosa@feddit.dk 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

And at what point is it no longer a "dictatorship of the proletariat"? Do you really think, say, the Soviet leaders were looking out "for the proletariat"? Is Kim Jong-Un doing so because the country's official name contains the word "people"?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

The working class saw a doubling of life expectancy, reduced working hours, tripled literacy rates, cheap or free housing, free, high quality healthcare and education, and the gap between the top and bottom of society was around ten times, as opposed to thousands to millions. The structure of society in socialist countries is fashioned so that the working class is the prime beneficiary. Having "people" in the name of the country makes no difference on structure, be it the PRC, DPRK, or otherwise, what matters is the structure of society.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

No, the soviet union was democtatic. The soviet union had a more comprehensive and complex system of democracy than liberal democracy.

[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was even dissolved through a vote

Illegally though, most of citizens voted against in a referendum that was just ignored.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)
[–] AbeilleVegane@beehaw.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The voting for leftists into office one is there twice.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago
[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Thank you, as a democratic socialist this is what I was looking for.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Plebcouncilman@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Sometimes I wonder how many “Marxists” really have read Marx.

[–] KimBongUn420@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Only those that did know that you can't vote away capitalism.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The DSA has everyone from reformist soc dems, to anarchists, to MLs, to Maoist Third Worldists

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (2 children)

and that's precisely the reason it's been so effective

[–] jorge@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Were you were being sarcastic? I am Brazilian and know nothing of the DSA.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago

Yes, he was being sarcastic.

[–] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 week ago

Supa-hot-fire.gif

"I'm about to ruin this man's whole career"

load more comments
view more: next ›