this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
46 points (97.9% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34565 readers
2076 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PonyOfWar@pawb.social 26 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

For the kinds of gene therapy we currently have, it wouldn't make that much of a difference for society, but could have a positive effect for people affected by conditions that can be treated with it. Although as I understand it, those treatments are far from perfect and do frequently have adverse effects as well.

If we're talking the sci-fi kind of gene therapy that could stop aging, make people more intelligent etc, that would be an entirely different story. It would have massive societal ramifications and I think especially under capitalism, they wouldn't be good. It would increase inequality by massive amounts and basically turn the rich elites into their own, genetically-superior species.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Same situation with cybernetic implants. The rich would have infinite eidetic memory and computation power built into their skull. The poor would be forced to have muscle implants if they wanted a job, or worse, much much worse.

[–] kassiopaea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, Cyberpunk 2077 does have construction workers being contractually obligated to receive strength-augmenting implants that are low quality and frequently malfunction and/or drive the wearer to homicidal insanity.

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just think what a company could do with a full motor control interface to their workers. The worker themselves could be asleep or in a virtual world and not have to worry about all that pesky work.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

... why wouldn't they just use robots?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because other humans will pay for the feel of genuine humans.

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

For unthinking construction labor?

[–] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

No, for rubbing up against.

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 week ago

It would increase inequality by massive amounts and basically turn the rich elites into their own, genetically-superior species

[–] folekaule@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I believe the movie Gattaca's premise is around this subject.

[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

I came here to say exactly this.

[–] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It'd probably be fucked up like how it was depicted in Star Trek.

[–] BurgerBaron@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago

I think bad people would try to genetically enslave us and it'd be way more boring than Star Trek hunter/hunted.

[–] lime@feddit.nu 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

it's a broad term used to refer to any medical treatment that uses gene technology somehow.

there's mostly two variants today:

  • mRNA medication. that one is temporary. it does something to you, then the effect wears off by itself within day, weeks or months. this one is new-ish (first used since around 2015) but it's getting more and more usage because it works well and has typically few side-effects.
  • DNA-modifying medication. that one is permanent and possibly hereditary, i.e. it would affect your offspring too. a.f.a.i.k. it's practically not used today due to the grave and long-lasting impacts it would have on individuals and society.
[–] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so the answer to the question is "we already know, we already spent the entirety of 2021-2023 doing it".

The question is more hypothetical than practical. Comparing what we can currently achieve with genetic therapy to its actual potential is comparing an ice cube with an iceberg.

[–] OneSpectra@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Maybe DNA plasmids could be used in medicine.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Either x-men or just less people with genetic diseases. Not sure which one though...

[–] liquidapricity@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

.... Bioshock

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

My honest opinion is that we aren't there yet. If people use gene therapy on a large scale today (the one that actually alters the DNA inside the cell's nucleus) we're gonna end up with a large amount of genetic damage, damaged individuals and damaged offspring within a few generations.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A lot of people are going to be hotter.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

I offer a rebuttal: plastic surgery exists and is a hell of a lot cheaper than genetic engineering is, and I wouldn't say people are hotter. The rich ones, 1000%. Your every day people, probably not.

not having to fiddle with eyeliner would be amazing though

[–] blarghly@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

This is mostly cultural. In colombia, they have a saying "the only ugly woman is a poor woman."

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 week ago

It depends on the country. Some countries, like South Korea and Brazil, absolutely have more attractive people who have access to they level of plastic surgery and have specific form they are trying to match. We are also only seeing plastic surgery getting better to a point where people don't look like they've had plastic surgery.

I would also argue that generic engineering is going to be used differently. Various skin disorders, including acne, could be treated at the genetic level. You could also potentially change fat storage and muscle growth, making people thinner and more muscular; a byproduct of which would make them attractive.

Then, think of the children. Parents can design their children to be more physically fit even among their own genes. There's been a meme going around of Henry Cavill and his brothers, using Squidwards as a way to comment on the variation in attractiveness. Imagine a future where parents could choose all their kids to be the attractive versions.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I imagine genetic traits like down syndrome or bodily mutations would be a lot less common.
Autism, ADHD, depression, anxiety too depending on what kinda healthcare this fictional society has.
if it's anything like plastic surgery, nothing will happen except maybe down syndrome and bodily mutations.

if it's cheap though people are gonna go ALLL out on bodily cosmetics. Id want a spiky dick with one of those spiky balls at the end like that one dinosaurs tail.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

like that one dinosaurs tail

Ankylosaurus

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

I would be able to tan and have no need for glasses. Be great to have some sort of youthening.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

A global society where science has advanced enough and everyone is wealthy enough to be able to do this? They can do what they want with it I guess, we'll never see it

[–] omgboom@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago