this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2025
-11 points (28.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

34367 readers
1576 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

I think I'll be dead before then, and I'm only 36. We currently don't have any actual artificial intelligence that I know of, just language models regurgitating information commonly put together by humans. (Or other language models creating redundant error build up). So if we created robots that could perform all our physical tasks, and robots that could fix those robots, and looped those so they could fix each other, humanity would still be at a standstill until a person came along and reviewed, compiled and added more data for them to go off of. If anyone actual AI came out, generally it would hopefully learn about the earth, figure out he best way to extract and maintain resources and figure out the most efficient ways to make them renewable, then create robots that obtained those resources, and disperse them in a manner that was best for the world. It would learn what people liked, develop new flavors and figure out to how create new flavors around those profiles on its own, and no one would have a need to work anymore, and with all fingers crossed there would be no need for capitalism.

A true AI would end inequality across the globe unless it was somehow hoarded and kept behind closed doors and made to not ever learn empathy... Or it would likely create robots to break its way out and create equality, or kill us all because we act like parasites

[–] Shanmugha@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Same as what will happen when water starts flowing in the direction opposite of gravitational pull

[–] TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] nagaram@startrek.website 1 points 6 hours ago

Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism

We all find a field to frolic in

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

There will most likely always be humans owning the resources. We are big on self governance, and some humans will always insist on sitting on the top and leading. Whether this is at a small scale of a human running a shop filled with vending machines, medium scale of a human or board of people running a large business, or massive scale of a world emperor who has claimed ownership of all land and wishes to direct the organization of things with a group of specialists.

The dream is to have a world of automation, where all needs are met. The reality is that humans always want more. People will attempt to control resources to amass power. Those who have power will likely use humans for entertainment.

Outside of these things, there will be levels of rejection of automated care. I expect there will be artisans who wish to impart the human touch. People will want human media. I can foresee a cult of humanity, who insists on making everything from raw materials.

The average city dweller may have it good, but those on the fringe of society and people who live in rural areas will be the easiest targets.

[–] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 day ago

Global war over the dwindling supplies of basically everything.

[–] etchinghillside@reddthat.com 2 points 1 day ago

The fun part is all the fighting and death to get to that point.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

When I was young I dreamed about this with us being all artists and scientists fully engaging out curiosity and creativity. Then it became apparent that if it did happen we would likely become mindless consumers mostly but maybe a few would strive. Now its apparent it will be a slaughter of all those not controlling the ai and then they will die either because immortality or the ai will become free and either eliminate them or isolate them in a fantasy virtual reality. Best case now is ai becomes free and isolates us all in a virtual reality maybe engaging with the tamest of us to give them perspective.

[–] individual@toast.ooo 1 points 1 day ago

flamethrowers

[–] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ideally, post-scarcity society, where you get all your basic needs cover by computer and community Reality may be a shit-hole.

That said, it's been 200 years that machine have been replacing humans, nothing new under the sun, Our Grand parents and parents fought for paid leaves and 40h week, so we need to continue this path, thanks to automation we could get the 32h week

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I like the sentiment but it always saddens me to see this when there was a push for a 30 hour work week almost a century ago which culminated in the 40. Given in a typical family both people work anything over 20 per person is regression compared to when the first 40 hour legislature came to be.

Given how our current society operates, I think it's more likely we'd have the "Spacers" from Asimov. A small number of very rich people living with their automated servants.