this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
85 points (98.9% liked)

news

24343 readers
1033 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Le_Wokisme@hexbear.net 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

this wouldn't have saved me, i was already driving when i started to get fucked up on [discontinued brand] at school

better thing to do would be to not make teenagers get up in the morning

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 47 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Seriously they should, it would be better for them. They dont because sports and extra curricular come after 3 PM (if they start later that all starts later too) and also cause it fits parents' work schedules. Except theyre teens, they hopefully should be able to be trusted to be more independent and go to school by 10 AM.

[–] darkcalling@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Ah but that would send the dangerous message to the proles that they have some right to sleep in for health which might carry over into adulthood as demands for flexible work hours to suit human bodies and lifestyles! porky-scared

Better to beat them down as children, regiment them, abuse them, force them to take drugs and get used to it early so it's seen as normal and part of "growing up" porky-happy (And as a bonus it generates demand for our caffeine drug market further taking money from their pockets and adding another cost they have to bear just to earn a living)

[–] TerminalEncounter@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just keep thinking of the dead teens graves that should be marked "died while driving exhausted, so we could keep school schedules aligned for maximum profit generation"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jack@hexbear.net 36 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

oi

ye got a loicense fer dat red bull?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

good idea, bad timing. (also better idea to regulate their contents, say for kids caffeine/taurine lower than x, but whatever)

(sleepy kids bought straight caffeine from pharmacies anyway, but like there is something to be said about moderation)

[–] Goblin@hexbear.net 31 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

I see so many freaks down like 3-4 of these a day. Schools honestly need to create some curriculum for health Ed about acceptable caffeine limits

It's never been so easy to slowly kill yourself lmao

[–] Euergetes@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

It's never been so easy to slowly kill yourself lmao

how many people are dying of cafeine

[–] Goblin@hexbear.net 24 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

About 10 per year but those are usually accidental crazy amounts. More talking about the stress on your heart. Adds up if your drinking this shit like crazy

[–] MizuTama@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Can't die to caffeine if something else gets ya first. Checkmate. sips energy drink

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] OttoboyEmpire@hexbear.net 27 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

treatlerites reeling. "socialists" crying about paternalism and manifesting thatcher when they - who are evidently children- aren't allowed to have unlimited access to their highly processed bright green ooze.

[–] mudpuppy@hexbear.net 22 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

are you being sarcastic? this is war on drugs and oppression of children, im sorry that it's unappetizing to you, its still a systemic injustice. banning drugs isn't an effective way to reduce their harm on society, and this is being done out of the belief that children are subhuman

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 17 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I think 10 year olds shouldn’t have unlimited unsupervised access to drugs and that makes me a puritan and oppressor of children now i-cant

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SootySootySoot@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

This is the weirdest upvoted take on Hexbear I have ever seen.

There's a huge difference between imprisoning people for taking a drug, and banning the sale of goods to children.

But never mind, I agree, legalise the direct sale of cocaine to children now!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago

In a vaccuume, this is a good policy choice. In the context of English politics, this is something of a mistake. Living standards are in decline, more and more pensioners are freezing to death each winter, and the capitalists and blue-bloods are needling for any opportunity to privatize the NHS. If Labour actually lived up to their name (or at least were just cynically savvy), this ban would come alongside a package to actually work on and improve these problems.

Instead, it's just gonna be perceived as an austerity government doing a little bit of nanny state policy on the side, just because they can. Torries will use it as a rally cry, like the big-gulp soda thing in New York was, and most people will remember this as Labour electing to tinker at the margins rather than actually govern to anyone's benefit.

To be clear, this is a good policy. But it's a good policy being done in the most self-sabotaged manner possible.

[–] Keld@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

They cant stop kids from vaping, this ban isn't worth shit.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] EstraDoll@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago

i just had this ~~calypso~~ red bull, and it's FOOKIN' MINGING

[–] WeedReference420@hexbear.net 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Regardless of how healthy energy drinks are for under 16s (or anyone, really), this is a fairly short sighted decision if the plan is to allow 16 year olds to vote in the hopes they'll save Labour lmao

[–] 7bicycles@hexbear.net 25 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I fucking detest energy drinks but any bill that bans them and not freely traded caffeine powder and or bills is going to be worthless

[–] WeedReference420@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago

Yeah, I've heard awful stories of people bulk buying caffeine powder off the internet and then straight up taking a lethal overdose

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] tim_curry@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

Huh I thought this was already the case since you get ID’d for energy drinks which was extremely annoying in my 20s. The most annoying one was getting ID’d for painkillers while sick.

In school I’d buy a litre of corrosive red bull knockoff for 99p and drink the whole thing

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 21 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, what is childhood for if not drinking dangerous amounts of caffeine and sugar?

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

I knew kids that would just take caffeine pills straight up instead of energy drinks. Hell I am not even against it in theory, when I was younger I LOVED Rockstar freeze Pineapple & Coconut to an unhealthy degree, but tbh I would have found something else to be addicted to.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I used to do that as a teen.

I still do, but I used to, too.

[–] redchert@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Au-ADHD brain is really something else when it comes to dopamine hits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BountifulEggnog@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Way cheaper, if I ever decide to start taking caffeine that's what I'd do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GalaxyBrain@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

As long as youre not taking them by the handful they can be nice when you want caffeine but tummy hurts

[–] mudpuppy@hexbear.net 19 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

i bet this is gonna make energy drinks so much cooler for kids and eliminate any conversation about how to consume them in a healthy way, they'll chug five in their room before school instead of doing it in the open

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Big_Bob@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It has already happened in Norway. Some stores, like Meny, requires ID for anyone under 14. Everyone else have to scan their fingerprints at the self-checkout.

[–] Wheaties@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

that sounds obnoxious, never met a fingerprint scanner that wasn't finicky as hell

like, if you're gonna do it, then scan the barcode on my driver's license like a real surveillance state, not the stage-play stuff you see in movies

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Carl@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago

In an old special, Eddie Izzard tells the joke: "No smoking in bars anymore, and soon, no drinking and no talking."

I used to think that was a funny joke, but I guess it was just an accurate prediction of England's future.

[–] mrfugu@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

I once hung out with some dude bros who brought a big sack of caffeine powder around with them. They would rail it almost constantly. No idea if that’s actually effective I think they would’ve been happier with coke lmao

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Are they going to ban children from drinking tea while they're at it?

[–] OttoboyEmpire@hexbear.net 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

surely there's not a difference between the toxic sludge marketed to minors and a cup of tea?

[–] glimmer_twin@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago

The amount of people on this website who display zero dialectical understanding of the world is disturbing for a supposedly communist platform

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

Energy drinks are way worse than tea though. 55g of sugar per can and some kids will drink two or three of these a day.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Now you accidentally tripped over very based idea, tea embargo for all Brits.

[–] tim_curry@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (5 children)

I don’t think the children are drinking tea. Because of woke. I used to mix tea and instant coffee together when I was a kid cos I’m weird

[–] 30_to_50_Feral_PAWGs@hexbear.net 13 points 2 weeks ago

The Briton Wrestling Federation is not ready for "Matcha Man" Randall Civilized

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] alexei_1917@hexbear.net 12 points 2 weeks ago

It's Britain. The majority of the people there might actually put a cultural cornerstone like tea on a higher moral pedestal than your average adult liberals put state sanctioned ridiculous restrictions on children on. Anywhere else, you could attempt that, and people would laugh, and teenagers would protest, but ultimately no massive resistance would take place if laughing it out didn't work. Because when authoritarian and pointless nonsense only affects children, no one actually sees it as a fundamental violation of freedoms and civil liberties. But in the UK, people might actually do something if the government tried to restrict who's allowed to buy, brew, and drink tea. Because Brits love their tea and see British tea stereotypes as a Valued Cultural Institution.

[–] insurgentrat@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

The sugar is the worst shit about these. One can of V is like a fistful.

This is puritanic cringey bullshit. Banning stuff is pointless, governments would be better served enforcing plain packaging, limits on sugar before something has to be prominently labelled as confectione, sold in a separate section with %of daily energy and sugar larger than the brand name or something,

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Frogmanfromlake@hexbear.net 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I know a lot of people who chug this stuff like it’s water. I don’t know how they do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 9to5@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anything that takes away any joy from those little gammons is a win in my book.

[–] into_highest_invite@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 2 weeks ago

living in england already does this

load more comments
view more: next ›