this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2025
66 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13967 readers
589 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] came_apart_at_Kmart@hexbear.net 35 points 4 days ago (1 children)

inside this reactionary coalition are two wolves.

one is billionaire technofuturist capitalist barons who want the cyberpunk future where they live as gods, immortal, and have secure pedophile islands.

one is blood and soil, white nationalist christofascist death cultists.

these wolves hate each other but have made common cause assuming that, once the mirage-like goal of victory is at hand, they will have the upper hand and silence the other.

this administration knows it must throw new meat to each of the wolves in turn and I suspect this is meant to soothe the death cultists and calm their rage at the now very public and obvious epstein cover up.... which is kind of a big deal.

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

one is billionaire technofuturist capitalist barons who want the cyberpunk future where they live as gods, immortal, and have secure pedophile islands.

This is why Mars is so tantalizing, what better place to be a god and have your own child bride harem than a million miles from earth's pesky laws?

[–] prole@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

This is essentially the entire point of colonization throughout history. Rich people escaping the laws of their homeland to exploit the people/resources they are colonizing and/or to bring poor people from their home country to exploit even harder than they were before.

Edit: and in some cases, kidnap and enslave people from a completely separate 3rd place and bring them to the new colony...

[–] PKMKII@hexbear.net 25 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Love that the pastor’s view that “women are the kind of people that people come out of” is indistinguishable from JK Rowling’s view on women.

[–] Real_User@hexbear.net 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It follows that men are the kind of people that people go into

[–] YEP@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think most people do not understand that trump isn't leading us to fascism. It's here, we are a fascist country. The guys who are proud of being fascist are in power they are remaking and establishing new institutions to reinforce control.

Sorry been very doomer last couple days and want to yell in the void a bit

Whatever happened to the middle east is barbarically misogynist ,who am I kidding these people probably still say that

[–] MaoTheLawn@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

A complete nutcase not fit to be anywhere near the levers of power.

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

progressive evangelical group

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

A country by and for incels.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Normie moment. Classic tyranny of the majority.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 29 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Why do you keep posting about "tyranny of the majority"? Women not voting is definitionally opposed to majoritarian rule, and not unrelatedly the vast majority of Americans support the 19th Amendment.

Normie moment

Obligatory: https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

You're demonstrating that you don't remotely understand popular sentiment and using what you imagine it to be as a basis for elitist sneering.

[–] Lyudmila@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

Hexbear users and assuming that teenage boys are representative of the American majority: name a more iconic duo.

Or, put another way: "Tell me you're 16 without telling me you're 16."

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

How am I an elitist for calling out elitism? Even redsails says it themselves, westerners are smug bourgeois and do this out of their own arrogance.

Besides I am disgusted at them for advocating to restrict women’s votes because they think they’re superior to women. Bigotry is elitist.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You ignored my argument, but I don't expect that to change.

This is all deflection and playing with words. Posing yourself as superior to "normies" (gross channer-ism, btw) is the most textbook definition of elitism. You know this, and you surely recognize it in liberals often. You know those blue state fuckers who gloat when some natural disaster rips through part of a red state, and obviously there is going to be structural systemic negligence, so many people die preventable deaths and the shitlibs all go "that's what you get for being redneck hicks who just want to murder Mexicans." Obviously there is sadism there that I'm not asserting in your case, but it's just the most unambiguous expression of the snide attitude that shitlibs take toward massive swaths of the population who they don't understand and just lump together as dumb Trump voters (never mind that even in red states Trump typically only had a plurality of the adult population vote for him).

When you talk about "normies" (i.e. the derisive name channers use for normal people) and the "tyranny of the majority" (despite this not being a majority view, something you are unable to contend with), you are doing literally, bar-for-bar the same thing, posing yourself as superior to the disgusting masses of society who you do not understand and crassly misrepresent. Try reading past the second section of the redsails article for more on this.

Normal people are far to the left of the political establishment on many issues, and even the overwhelming majority of the political establishment does not condone repealing the 19th Amendment (a notable exception seemingly being the Secretary of State, but again that's an exception). There is a domestic bias to their progressivism, making them basically socdems, but we're talking about domestic policy here.

Truthfully, I don't understand why this is even a contentious point. "Tyranny of the majority" is literally the historical rallying cry of liberal elitism, and the way that children in America have been taught to hate democracy for centuries.

And again, it's not the majority, not a plurality, not even a strong minority view, but you've somehow convinced yourself of its popularity with literally no evidence except, I must assume, myopic anecdotes or internet brainrot. It's literally such a consensus issue that it's hard to find polling data on the question. Don't get me wrong, I fully expect the currently very fringe "repeal the 19th" crowd to grow over the next decade, thanks partly to Trump bringing in freaks like Hegseth, but it is very unlikely that they will ever be the majority of the population in part because women are the majority of the population. There are definitely some "tradwives" who advocate against women, but in so far as adults discuss this issue, it's mostly men who support it, and even among men it is still a tiny fringe belief, especially if you exclude minors.

Also, this isn't important to the point at hand, but:

westerners are smug bourgeois

You're misappropriating Lenin here (though your grammar makes it needlessly difficult to interpret, you probably should have said "bourgeoisie"). To say that a class has bourgeois features is not the same as saying it simply is a member of the bourgeoisie, and doing so flattens class politics within the imperial core, which is a bad idea if you want to do anything other than feel superiority and disgust. It would be more accurate to use it as an adjective, as Lenin does, but also I think it's just a crude term compared to "labor aristocrat," which avoids misimplications about property relations.

There are one or two extremely tedious grammatical arguments that you can make in response to this, but I'm leaving them unaddressed here because they're a waste of time.

[–] darkmode@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

glad we can attribute this to normie behavior instead of anything more recent bc teenage boys have been saying stuff like this for at least 100 years

edit: I wrote this comment without clicking the link. the "shared" video is even dumber than I imagined I figured party pete reposted some epic trole video instead of a christian one. we gave the internet atheists too much shit.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 24 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Apparently this board can just flip into 4chan mode, ascribing the most deranged beliefs to "normies" when all evidence is against them out of nothing but sheer hate for the bulk of the population.

No, this isn't "normie" behavior. "Normies" overall view this sort of thing as freakish.

[–] darkmode@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I am pretty confident in my off the cuff suggestion that children raised in majority reactionary america spout reactionary beliefs. the stuff that ppl like pete and the official admin twitter accounts have been posting and reposting are lowest common denominator internet memes and dude-joke bullshit.

[–] purpleworm@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago

You do see it among teenage boys, but teenage boys -- mostly actual children, as you acknowledge -- are not representative of ""normie"" belief. This is only a single step above saying that belief in Santa Claus is a ""normie"" belief because so many children believe it. ""Normies"" view the "repeal the 19th" people as freakish and only a small number of actual adults support it, and they're on the fringe right. There's a reason that expressing the view makes news.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

All “epic trolls” are dead serious on what they want. It’s just that their whole motive is that they’re ontologically evil and want people to suffer because of they think its funny.