this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2025
245 points (95.9% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42866 readers
915 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like I'd imagine there's gonna be a lot of rain over time if I want this time capsule to last like idk 10 years? 30 years?

Is there like a box so tough its indestructible?

Can animals dig it up if I bury it?

How deep do it bury it?

Is the earth's magnetism gonna affect the hard drive? (Or is there a better medium?)

Like I want this to be like very low budget, I don't have millions to build an actual timecapsule like some organizations have done. Is there some cheap box that's waterproof to protect a hard drive from damage for like 30 years buried in the ground?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Deestan@lemmy.world 103 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hard drives aren't rated for 30 years, though. Even in optimal conditions, they'd deteriorate.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 45 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

So, an atomic powered RAID array with SMART corruption correcting code attribute in a timed replacement sequence of a series of single platter, low RPM, drives, using ZFS?

But apparently, using a simple archival quality DVD+R or Blu-ray would work. (Don't forget to include the hardware so you have something that can read it in the future.)

Apparently verbatim gold archive DVD+r has been rated for between 32 and 127 years with a minimum 18.

Some Blu-ray from a few corps is rated at 50 years.

Under ideal conditions.

However, I'll stick to my crystal skulls and their magic alien data storage.

Also: https://github.com/usnationalarchives/digital-preservation

https://www.archives.gov/preservation/storage

Sidenote: my few Linux machines are all running on HDDs that are each at least 10 years old. With additional internal and external 5" and external 2.5" drives that are just as old. My oldest is probably about 15.

Thank the Linus for smartmontools and smartd/smartctl.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

atomic powered

Brb, gonna steal the plutonium from the Libyans.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] drre@feddit.org 69 points 5 days ago
[–] Creat@discuss.tchncs.de 58 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hard drives that aren't used will get data errors over time. Usually for data storage this is counteracted with what's called a "scrub" every so often (like few months). This just means the whole drive content is read, and the drive itself will figure out if any areas have a "weak signal", and just rewrite that part.

Having only 1 drive without any mirror and without any way to detect potential errors (let alone a way to correct them) is a recipe for disaster.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 19 points 5 days ago

And definitely don't use an SSD.

[–] LordWiggle@lemmy.world 39 points 5 days ago

You must have an amazing porn collection. You can store it on my NAS

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

They key is to diversify. Use different types of storage media, and duplicate your efforts and bury then duplicates somewhere else.

~~If you can choose only 1 I would choose tape archives.~~ Vacuum seal all your media, whatever they may be. Throw in some of those dehumidifier packets. Moisture will be your biggest enemy.

If possible, also add the means to be able to read your media after a long time. Add a couple of raspberry pi computers, vacuum sealed and dehumidified-by-packets again, and usb readers or HATs for the media you chose (though I doubt you will find a cheap tape drive with USB connection, the only option I found was £9000).

Over the years, as new technology gets developed, in particularly interface connectors that will replace USB, I would add converters if possible or just keep them around. Nothing suspicious about having some USB/sata/sas to converter in your house.

Or, you know, you could always go with m-disc. Burners are cheap (40€ to 160€) and discs are cheap (4x 100GB costs 100€). For potentially 140€ you could store 400GB on a solid solution. Would still add a reader and devices as described above.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I'm going to buck the trend here and suggest a really physical storage medium: Print your data out. Or laser engrave it onto sheets of metal or polymer, or whatever you want to do. If you just print pokey old black and white ones and zeros as square pixels on a sheet of 8.5x11" paper at a humble 72 DPI you can store a shade under 47 kilobytes per page without having to resort to any additional trickery. Maybe a kB or two less if you need to leave margins. How much data are you really trying to store?

In a sealed container in the dark you could easily make paper last hundreds of years (we have perfectly intact books sitting on ordinary shelves from the 1800s already), and if you wanted to print on Tyvek or something it'd probably endure thousands.

Reading this back would not be a plug-and-play solution but would have the added advantage of being a purely optical process rather than having to interface with antique storage device electronics on whatever computer you may be using 30 years from now. All you'd need is sheet feed scanner or in a pinch any sufficiently high resolution camera, and the ability to run some kind of programming environment to run a script to read those pixels back into file data.

Maybe this wouldn't be great for archiving your collection of 4k ultra-definition porn, but it'd be absolutely sufficient for storing text and executable data for small programs, plans and schematics, other knowledgy sciency data, and even images... with the added benefit of, if any gestapo thug happens to find this early and dig it up he won't be able to ascertain what that image is just by looking at the piece of paper.

[–] Atlas_@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you actually want to use paper... QR codes. The format is simple, broadly distributed, and has error correction built in. It'll make the whole process a lot easier than trying to roll something yourself.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Another poster here suggested the High Capacity Color Barcode as well, which ought to already have some implementations available somewhere and sports an even higher data density if you're willing (or able) to deal with color.

QR codes are limited to being square in aspect ratio (other than the not terribly helpful "micro rectangular QR" format) and have a maximum payload of ~3kB each. This may not be a great fit for plain consumer paper with a rectangular aspect, and you'd need to jigger some manner of batch reader so's you don't drive yourself insane recovering the data. Neither is an insurmountable problem; I'm just thinking out loud, here.

[–] IphtashuFitz@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

I’d be wary of one or more colors fading over time unless you are VERY careful with how you print these. Being monochromatic, QR codes don’t have such issues. It would likely also be easier to recover a faded QR code than a colored bar code.

[–] RoyaltyInTraining@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I once heard that some printers print (almost) invisible yellow dots on pages, containing data which helps authority track down whoever printed the page. That might be a risk if the data is really sensitive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] traceur201@piefed.social 45 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think if you want 10+ years with high assurance you probably want to burn the data to archival quality BD-R disks (not the dye based ones)

The right spinning platter hard drives might have a decent chance to make it 10 years but there's a lot of possible failure modes and also a decent chance that when you try spinning it back up it gives nothing but read errors.

For cases for "only" 10-30 years I might pick a pelican-like case inside a makeshift wooden coffin-like outer layer. For longer I'd probably use a metal box like an ammo box inside the plastic case and a stone outer layer instead of wood

[–] Thorry84@feddit.nl 14 points 5 days ago

You would need to investigate the soil you put the wood in, in order to select the correct wood and wood treatment. The wrong kind of wood in certain soils can be broken down in weeks to months. Getting wood to last years is tricky and depending on the soil could even be impossible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cam_i_am@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

If this is a real problem you have, and not just a thought experiment, I think rather than burying the data on some unreliable medium, your best bet is to just pay someone to store it for you offshore, away from the dictatorship you mentioned.

There are plenty of consumer-grade cloud storage services. I'm sure there are more niche ones specifically for long-term archival as well, which would usually be cheaper per bit, per-year, if you don't need to access the data regularly.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

For a somewhat recent real-world example of hiding things in this kind of situation, maybe look at how 'paramilitary' people in Northern Ireland hid things by putting them in walls and then decorating the wall.

Maybe some "outlet" in your house is actually the connector to the NAS sealed into a void space?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] perviouslyiner@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Sorry if this is obvious to everyone, but how would having a hidden hard disk help with living in a dictatorship?

Couldn't you just let someone in another country take care of archiving it?

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's 8tb of porn and the government will be banning it, and they're hoping it'll pass with time like prohibition did?...

[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

If it were me, I'd be skimming a little to sell on the side to take advantage of those black market prices.

Vintage Hulk Fucks Black Widow GIF - $500

[–] floo@retrolemmy.com 37 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

A much better medium would be tape back up, or possibly Blu-ray discs. Either one would last a lot longer than a hard drive.

[–] dysprosium@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 5 days ago (2 children)

A so-called M-disk is rated for 1000 years. Artificial lab tests could at least 'confirm' a few hundred years. Amazing shit.

Add encryption to it, keep the keys safe (perhaps on another M-disk) and you're set!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] traches@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I’d go with optical media here. Probably multiple capsules.

  • M-Disk (DVD if it will fit, otherwise Blu-ray)
  • Make an encrypted archive of your data. Strong password - I suggest diceware with 8 or more words so you might remember it in 30 years
  • Use DVDisaster to add parity data. You sacrifice some space, but you get error tolerance in exchange
  • Wrap the disks up in good jewel cases, well sealed plastic, along with some good big silica gel desiccant packs.
  • Put all that in the smallest durable, airtight container you can
  • stash somewhere it probably won’t be disturbed for a few decades. Memorize.
  • destroy all evidence you did this.
[–] ooterness@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

~~This is terrible advice.~~ Most writable DVDs degrade quickly, even if they're stored away from sunlight and heat. Every single one of my burned DVDs from more than a few years back is completely unreadable.

Update: I missed the very important line about M-DISC. This is critical. I can't vouch for M-DISC personally, but most other optical media is garbage for archival purposes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

No way. Optical media suffer bitrot at a high rate compared to magnetic media. And the means to read it are quickly going obsolete.

[–] Twinklebreeze@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (11 children)

That's what the m-disk is for I assume.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DirigibleProtein@aussie.zone 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

So much data has already been lost due to bitrot caused by magnetic loss and plastic breakdown. Most consumer grade storage will break down and start to lose data within a decade. Even if the data survives, will the operating system and software be available in the future to read the media? Surprisingly, the best way to preserve data long term is to print it on paper. Or write it to a gold record and send it into space.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The english wikipedia is only 100GB, so its easy to fit on digital storage, but printing it on paper is gonna take a whole building of physical space to even fit it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NoodlePoint@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago

Most of those ideas are not feasible with a very low budget you want because eventually rot will get to the hard drive and thus making the contents unreadable. So -- depending on what you want to preserve -- it's either writable media or printed out in acid-free paper or in microdot negative film, and of those methods, only print media -- written, typed, from a copier, or with a laser printer -- might as well be cheap.

[–] sunstoned@lemmus.org 16 points 5 days ago

My take -- OP is an anti-authoritarian time traveler. Go get em! I hope your data stays safe.

P.s. - want to drop me some winning lottery numbers? My dms are open

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 5 days ago (10 children)

i think your best bet would just be to brute force it: get a bunch of different media (usb-drives, CDs, hard drives, whatever you can get your hands on and ideally from different brands) and just put the same data on all of them, then wrap in a series of plastic bags that you try to put a vacuum on, put in the most durable water and ideally airtight container you can get your hands on, then again wrap that in some plastic bags because why not.
Then bury all that as deep as you can and surround it in rocks, especially i think you'll want a bunch of rocks on top of it. And for extra points repeat all this as many times as possible in different locations.

All this is just to compound the chances that at least one of the copies of the data will survive, and even if that fails you'll hopefully end up with enough data being intact across the different storage mediums that you can piece the data together somehow, i'm not sure how precisely you'd do that but it's at least possible to figure out so long as the data is there.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] sefra1@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

The issue with hard drives is that they tend to fail even on ideal conditions and even when powered down. Yes I've lost very important data to a powered down hard drive.

While it's possible to recover information on a hard drive as long as the plates themselves aren't damaged, that requires very expensive specialised tools and skills. Which probably wouldn't be available in a scenario where the information on the drive would be of any value.

DVD-R (and probably consequentially Blu-Rays) aren't any better in my experience, I've lost more data to DVD-R than to hard drives actually. Even when stored in low light conditions they tend to just stop reading.

However optical media has one big advantage here, is that the discs themselves are cheap, so instead of having all your digital eggs in the same basket, you spread them over several discs and while some information may be lost, others may survive.

Now, here's an interesting thought, with digital data, the data either reads or doesn't read, the so called digital cliff, may become partially corrupted and other parts still read, but after the corruption gets past a certain threshold all information is lost.

With analogue equipment even after severe signal degradation the contents while very deteriorated may still be perceptible, forwardermore an analogue signal is much easier to decode in the event that you need to restart ~~civilisation~~ building tech from scratch and don't have access to the very very specific specifications of something like the audio codec or the filesystem.

You can probably hack a rudimentary cassette player together from very simple components, all you need is a tape head (a coil), a motor (a coil and a magnet), and an amplifier (a transistor or vaccum tube). (I'm probably oversimplifying here).

Overall I think the most important thing is having redundancy, or if redundancy isn't possible at least don't have all eggs in the same basket, instead of having everything in a single 8TB HDD, to try spread them into smaller 512GB ones, or DVDs or flash drives or all of the above. And don't store them all in the same location, if an area gets flooded or someone builds a building on top, you're only losing a small part of the information.

[–] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago

If it's small you might try printing the files on archival paper with archival ink. Then you can put copies in multiple safe deposit boxes. Also you could bury copies rolled up in plastic water bottles. I think those are unlikely to degrade anytime soon. Or glass bottles with plastic lids.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Capacity_Color_Barcode

[–] Berttheduck@lemmy.ml 15 points 5 days ago

You could look at fire safe boxes for document storage. Those are usually pretty solid. You would want to bag up the drive inside an anti static bag and probably put a couple of those little water absorbing silicone packets in there as well. If access isn't an issue then maybe some sealant around the seams to keep it more water tight.

Magnetic tape would be better for long term storage as well I think. Those have longer storage stability. I don't know how long an unplugged hard drive will reliably store information.

Animals could dig it up but probably wouldn't as it wouldn't smell like food. Depth wise I'd go for at least a couple feet deep, the traditional 6 is a surprisingly deep hole and temperature gets more consistent the deeper you go (at least with readily available tools, it eventually starts to get hot again).

Please note totally random opinion with very little experience with long term data storage. Thanks for the fun thought experiment, I hope things get better and you don't need your backup data.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 days ago

I have a question. Is this for you in the future, or for someone who may find it? If it's the latter, and it's just information you want to store, not media, I'd just go with paper. Storing digital data is both hard and error prone, and it also requires them to have the technology and power to read it. If things really go to hell, this isn't a guarantee. Paper ensures they can at least view it no matter what. It'll degrade eventually, but it'll hold up better than digital.

[–] discosnails@lemmy.wtf 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ammo can with silica gel beads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

As someone who has lost hard drive in the past, encrypt and back up to the cloud.

It is the safest way.

load more comments
view more: next ›