this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2025
932 points (99.4% liked)

Science Memes

16174 readers
1643 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 235 points 6 days ago (5 children)

I hate the reading order of Twitter.

[–] Johandea@feddit.nu 98 points 6 days ago (1 children)

~~I~~ hate ~~the reading order of~~ Twitter.

There! Much better!

[–] alk@lemmy.blahaj.zone 39 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Haha you are correct! I hate everything about it, including the reading order.

I 'ate its fur, I 'ate its guts, and I 'ate the way it's always barking!

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 30 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] flora_explora@beehaw.org 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Isn't it

3

2

1

4

in this example?

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 7 points 6 days ago

Yes, because there is a screenshot in one of the tweets.

[–] TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I don't think that's correct, I think it's

3
2
1
4

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

In this image because there is a screenshot.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 28 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Agreed. The microblogging format is more for one-way communication (i.e. 1 poster to many viewers). Trying to have a discussion or even just reading a discussion on twitter, mastodon, etc. is a terrible experience.

[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 12 points 6 days ago

It’s designed for soap boxing

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

Yeah Blue Sky is a pain in the ass too. If you go to the comments of a post, there's no way to collapse a thread. So it's just:

Main post

  • Top comment
    • A
    • Million
    • Fucking
    • Worthless
    • Replies
    • You
    • Can't
    • Collapse
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

So do I

Yes

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It's like the word balloons in a comic book. You just kinda work out the order via context.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

In comics there's variation on common forms but most have set sequences that just may vary between countries because of the directions of reading. Lots of manga even have the authors preferred style described at the start of the book now.

[–] Evil_Shrubbery@lemmy.zip 67 points 6 days ago
[–] moakley@lemmy.world 65 points 6 days ago (4 children)

There's a Disco Elysium joke here, but I can't think of how to phrase it. Just pretend I made a perfectly worded reference.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 30 points 6 days ago (1 children)

“Incredible. A new species. The chitinous shell, the impossibly long legs, the delicate, veined wings folded tight against its back. It is a creature unlike any you’ve ever seen, a marvel of evolutionary design. The scientific community will be astounded. Your name will be etched into the annals of entomology. You lean in closer, notebook and pen at the ready, to jot down the physical characteristics. And that’s when it hits you. It… it looks exactly like a stick. The profound truth, ugly and unshakeable, settles in your guts like a stone. Of course, you didn’t find it. Nobody found it. You were just the first one to stop and stare long enough to realize that the stick wasn’t a stick.”

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 days ago

PATTERN RECOGNITION [Legendary: Failure] Huh, weird stick.. Anyways let's go get dinner.

[–] atomicorange@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I immediately thought of the Phasmid too! So this is me catching your perfectly worded reference and making a sly reply to let you know I’m in on the joke and we are both very cool for having encountered that piece of media.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

damn, that was a nice reference to the disco elysium video game

[–] kaklerbitmap@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago

Sick reference bro

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 60 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Just another example of entomologists withholding crucial information about the bug kingdom from us, who do they work for anyways? The humans or the bugs?

What if there are EVEN bigger bugs out there entomologists just conveniently haven't told us about yet...?

Think TREEbug not Stickbug.

The end is near and it is segmented into three main body sections!!

[–] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 32 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Legend has it there are beetles out there big as a Volkswagen.

[–] chatokun@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 days ago

Kerry Cassidy, that you? When's your next Mark Richards visit?

[–] Eyekaytee@aussie.zone 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

sounds like they’re working for big bug

[–] Lucky_777@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago

Imagine a 15 inch chocolate coated stick bug. You can't just get those anywhere. This is hidden information. Boycott bug and all it's bullshit.

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

as in Nibbles Woodaway?

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 5 days ago

you know trees?

👀

[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It says a lot about your stick emulation if you elude discovery that long. It has achieved peak stickness.

[–] Neverclear@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

Pure stickcellence

[–] InvalidName2@lemmy.zip 11 points 5 days ago

I'm not an ~~entemolo~~ ~~intenolo~~ bug scientician and I know nothing of the specifics of this species, so I can't weigh in there.

However, sometimes these new species have literally been right in front of our faces the whole time, it's just that they're barely distinguishable from other very similar and more common relatives.

This is, of course, a vast oversimplification of things, but I remember reading an article about a new beetle being discovered in some random suburb. Essentially the reason the new species was discovered is because someone was counting the number of hairs on the larval beetles' butts and noticed the discrepancy between two different populations and then realized that they were dealing with two different species, one of which had not been previously described.

[–] Nikls94@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

1

2

3

4

Wait… 3-2-1-4 ahhh

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 24 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I bet indigenous peoples knew about it at certain points.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 23 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Indigenous People: "Hello? Why hey, strangers, who are-"

Capt. Cook or some shit: "Hey there, you fellas good at working? Like, lots of manual labor?"

Indigenous People: "uhh... Wut?"

Capt Cook: "F it. Take the women, take their food, burn the rest."

Indigenous People: "Bro, hold up, we got this bug that looks like a sti-"

Capt Cook: "BURN IT ALL. NOW!"

Indigenous People: He'll never know about that really big F'in stick bug!

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Captain Christopher Cooklumbus: "You don't want to work, huh? How about if we cut off your hands?"

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"I mean, it's not like you're using them anyway? Amiright?"

Hands, schmands!

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

"A new species discovered" means "hey, we noticed nobody ever catalogued that one!"

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah! And, I don't even necessarily mean to discount ignoring indigenous folks, which definitely can be a thing, but it really really does come down to sometimes folks just don't write it down. I've seen a video (I wanna say a Smarter Everyday video) where they were in some South American jungle/rain forest or whatever and they very casually shine a light at a cloth to get moths to land on it, and they found like one or two new species.

[–] Tomassci@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 1 points 5 days ago

Could be, that's another channel I watch often. I might be getting some of Smarter Everyday's other nature oriented videos confused because I don't think Standup Maths does many.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 24 points 6 days ago

I heard it was discovered many times but it did not stick.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 days ago

Why is there a photo of a stick?

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 6 days ago

Of all creatures I've met, you are the kindest.

[–] winkly@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

What’s brown and sticky?

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago
[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 4 points 6 days ago