FundMECFSResearch

joined 11 months ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 1 points 15 minutes ago

Yeah, until they flew over your house. If you think living near an airport is bad these days…. Concorde begs to differ

The comments on that are pretty awful. Bunch of reactionaries using it as an excuse to dish on marginalised groups.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 4 points 3 hours ago

The success rate in humans for something discovered in mice is about 1 in 100.

So a lot of the scientific journalism presenting a mouse model as a major discovery that will revolutionise [X disease] is straight up bad faith clickbait.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 4 points 20 hours ago

Assuming they survived would probably fuck with fish populations and thereby the predators of fish and the predators of predators of fish.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 7 points 20 hours ago

Hey. The penguins i’ve seen in Melbourne look quite happy.

They even won a photo award ;)

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

It’s actually bears. The north is named by the Greeks after the Ursa Major constellation in the north literally “big bear”. So it’s the bear place. While the south is the opposite of the bears.

Happy coincidence it ended up matching polar bear ranges.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 8 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Apparently you could spot these bois chilling in Southern Spain or Florida.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 14 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I have great news for you, There’s a documentary series narrated by David Attenbrough called prehistoric planet. And is does exactly this. The next season will be on the most recent period (ie. ice age), so possible we will see these great auks that look like penguins.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 10 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Colonial name for Aotearoa

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Xitter blocked it recently as well…

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The tool measures distance with vocabulary. Afrikaans may be closer in vocabulary but pronounced very differently (since there’s way less cross talking since it’s so isolated), which would make it harder to understand to a Dutch speaker?

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.cafe 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Yes. This is often true. But Flemish and Dutch are far far closer in linguistic distance than dutch and german.

And they are completely mutually intelligeble. Unlike Dutch and German, (which I prefer to call hochdeutsch, since german is a nationalist contruct that erases many other languages spoken by peoples living in Germany-Switzerland-Austria.)

Like here we get a distance between Flemish and Dutch of 5.6, that’s the lowest I’ve ever seen with this tool.

While 13.5 with Dutch and German.

Compare that to French and Occitan, Occitan is a Romance language in southern France, which got erased and often claimed it’s just “part of french”. The distance between them is 20.

Edit: Playing round a bit more with the tool, Your point is proven. The distance between Dutch and Afrikaans is lower. Only 2. Yet that’s considered different languages.

 
 

A statistical analysis found that the number of fake journal articles being churned out by “paper mills” is doubling every year and a half.

Archive

The Study, published in PNAS: The entities enabling scientific fraud at scale are large, resilient, and growing rapidly

 
 
view more: next ›