this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2023
268 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59578 readers
2904 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Future Motion, the maker of the Onewheel electric skateboard, is recalling every one of them, including 300,000 Onewheel self-balancing vehicles in the US. Alongside the US Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC), the company now seeks to remedy the products after four known death cases — three without a helmet — between 2019 and 2021.

The recall comes a year after Future Motion took issue with the CPSC’s calls for recall and claimed that it tested and found nothing wrong with the Onewheels. At the time, the company issued a press release in objection to the CPSC and called the agency’s statements “unjustified and alarmist.”

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier. The company is asking owners to stop using their Onewheels until they take appropriate action. For the newer Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR, a software update with a new warning system is the remedy.

For early adopters, however, the CPSC and Future Motion are telling owners to stop using and discard the original Onewheel and Onewheel Plus. We asked Onewheel chief evangelist Jack Mudd in an email how many of the original units are affected, but Mudd refused to answer. Mudd also wouldn’t tell us why the company claimed there were no issues and publicly resisted issuing a recall back in 2022.

Mudd did say that the software update for the other models is rolling out worldwide, not just in the US.

Some crashes occurred due to Onewheel skateboards malfunctioning after being pushed to certain limits. The Onewheel GT, Onewheel Pint X, Onewheel Pint, and Onewheel Plus XR will receive a firmware update that will add a new warning “Haptic Buzz” feedback that riders can feel and hear when the vehicle enters an error state, is low on battery, or is nearing its limits and needs to slow down.

“This update is the culmination of months of work with the CPSC,” reads the company’s recall website. Last November, it called the CPSC’s warning about Onewheels “misleading” but stated it would “work to enhance the CPSC’s understanding of self-balancing vehicle technology and seek to collaborate with the agency to enhance rider safety.”

To install the update, owners must connect their Onewheels to the accompanying app and run a firmware update — the process is fully explained in a new video.

For early adopters, however, owners can receive a “pro-rated credit of $100 to the purchase of a new board,” according to Mudd. The credit will only be issued after owners confirm that they have disposed of the old model.

Alongside Future Motion’s blink on the decision to recall Onewheel, the company shared a new video on YouTube highlighting the new Haptic Buzz feature as well as best practices when riding. “We’ve been working closely with the CPSC for over a year in order to develop this new safety feature,” Mudd says in the video. He adds that ignoring pushback or Haptic Buzz “can result in serious injury or death.” It took engineers a while to whip up Haptic Buzz; perhaps it’s something that would not have been ready in a timely fashion after CPSC’s first whistle last year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] herr@lemmy.world 114 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

All of these words yet not a single one mentions what exactly was faulty about the old software. Did it force-eject drivers after "certain limits" were "exceeded"?

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 1 year ago

The one wheel works by having the rider lean in a direction to go that way. The more you lean, the faster it goes. It balances by pushing the rider in that direction. The trick is when you are leaning and going very fast, but then the board loses power and can't push you anymore. Then the board nose dives and ejects you. Its the physics of the board, so they can warn you it might happen, but not prevent it.

[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Agreed. I was going to suggest that specifics may not be publicly available unless the company has chosen to release them, but I realized that even then, the article should EXPLAIN that issue to us instead of just leaving things vague.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Requiring disposal to get a measely $100 credit on an $1,400 to $2,200 board seems a little extreme. Full replacement? Yeah, require proof of disposal. $100? Stop using it and turn it into a museum piece or something.

[–] Maximilious@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That was my thought too. Not knowing how much they cost and reading $100 I already knew that amount was way too low. I've gotten recalls on dehumidifiers in the past and the rebate usually equated to about half of a new unit. That's obviously apples to oranges but still a rediculous offering given the price of a newer model.

[–] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's a fire hazard recall out on my table saw, $75 to send them a pic of it inoperable. Nah, I'll just keep a fire extinguisher nearby.

[–] Pietson@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

AFAIK it's not even 100$, but 100$ worth of store credit. So people are being asked to return their device but it's ok, they get a tiny discount on the next one that functions pretty much the same.

[–] n00b001@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

100usd off of store purchases are nothing. I am just imagining they have postponed their 100usd off black Friday deal for another 6 months to justify this 'payment'

They don't lose anything from this offer.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 55 points 1 year ago

More e-waste for the landfill gods. The company should have free shipping back to them to recycle them, bare minimum. Huge waste of lithium.

[–] anlumo@lemmy.world 37 points 1 year ago

Given the company's history towards repairability, you shouldn't buy one in the first place. They're a future doorstop.

[–] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Super loose definitions of "every single" and "recall" here.

The oldest models are recalled, yes. Most of the units or on the world just need a software update.

[–] fubo@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A software update to a vehicle to correct a safety failure is a "recall" in industry terminology.

The oldest ones are not fixable and they advise junking them!

[–] jayandp@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

The oldest ones are not fixable and they advise junking them!

For $100 store credit. The nerve.

[–] Voyajer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Looking forward to the Louis Rossmann video on this

Edit: It's up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_Mk-5XkSmY

[–] PatFussy@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

The fact people died on these before isnt news.. the recall and getting 100 bucks for it is news.

[–] thorbot@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I can see his eye circles in my nightmares

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Somecall_metim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

guess the cost of a recall and fix was cheaper than the cost of settlements

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lettuceeatlettuce@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Onewheel is a garbage, monopolistic company that spits on consumer rights.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Onewheel is a ~~garbage, monopolistic~~ company ~~that spits on consumer rights.~~

Means the same thing nowadays anyway

[–] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Hey now, let's be fair. All of the companies are bad, but some of them are even more egregiously bad than others.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

they had a crappy anti consumer business model anyway.

sad but not surprised they fucked up further.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Now Future Motion is moving forward with a voluntary recall it chose not to do almost a year earlier

Since when could companies just chose when to recall their defective product?

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The government can compel product recalls, but must prove the product is defective. Companies can recall products voluntarily before that happens.

[–] TwoGems@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago
[–] Pietson@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Onewheels are working as intended, however the cpsc put them under investigation because they questioned the safety of these boards. This recall/firmware update is the result of that.

[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Are they going to recall all of the clones that are out there, too? All of these one-wheel "hoverboards" are super dangerous and nobody seems to care.

It's not like a skateboard or bike, where propelling the vehicle is all controlled by your body, or easy to find controls on a bike. A electric scooter has controls on the handle. These hoverboards are controlled by merely standing on them, and it's way too easy to try to stand on it and immediately break a leg or arm as it flies off away from you. You can't just turn it on and off as you're trying to stand on it.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This recall seems to be in response to a software bug that causes it to spontaneously shut down, leading to a crash. Competing products probably don't have the same bug.

That's unrelated to any inherent risk in riding one. There is certainly inherent risk in riding an electric unicycle/skateboard hybrid, which is obvious to most people upon reading the phrase "electric unicycle/skateboard hybrid".

[–] Endorkend@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

The sudden stop issue has been known for as long as these things existed and it's taken until a bunch of people died for them to do anything about it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] bionicjoey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

My sister broke her arm immediately upon trying to use a onewheel

load more comments
view more: next ›