this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2025
1094 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

7525 readers
882 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived Post

https://archive.ph/vzrga

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 week ago

Hey guys, there is a lot of troll baiting in this thread. You've been doing a great job of not falling for it, so I'm not going to lock it. Newbies to this thread, check the times of when it was made and if it brings up the distant past a lot, those are good clues. Leave one comment at most to save everyone's sanity.

[–] Scotty_Trees@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago

Didn't they dangle an "impeachment" so many times the last time it literally stopped meaning anything? I see thru this game and I ain't buying it.

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 162 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Which the Democrats should absolutely fucking do regardless of whether The Republicans will vote to convict, which of course they won’t, but the point is, we can’t just sit back and do nothing. We have to at least show that we’re willing to take the steps that are necessary to dissent.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 97 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump has already been impeached.

Twice.

The last time he was president.

It doesn't matter anymore.

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 39 points 1 week ago (1 children)

And became a felon after that.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 31 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Shortly before becoming president for the second time.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 70 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The cop at the protest yawns, unslings his 40mm LMT™ weapon, loads another rubber bullet into it, looks around the crowd for another reporter, aims, and shoots her in the head.

Idealistic youngling: "Wow, that cop just shot a woman in the head with a rubber bullet, he could totally be charged for that!"

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Americans are cowards. Period.

The constitutional right to be ARMED TO THE TEETH and they’re all pissing their pants in fear of… losing their jobs? They literally sat there, watched the worst of humanity seize power, and spent their political capital trying to limit their ability to fight back.

They deserve whatever they get.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darthelmet@lemmy.world 66 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I wish I still lived in the fantasy world where this was plausible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViatorOmnium@piefed.social 54 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That ship has sailed decades ago. The US hasn't been officially at war since 1945, and the congress has for all intents and purposes gave up on that power.

[–] falynns@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (6 children)

The speed Congress gave up their constitutional powers to avoid repurcusions for having opinions and voting for them is crazy. But I guess being able to give yourself a raise every year for doing nothing is tempting.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] rpa@europe.pub 35 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I remember all it took was some jizz...

[–] KingJalopy@lemm.ee 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Now we have an actual cum stain running this shit show

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Who cares? He was inoeached before already and it literally did NOTHING

Wake me up when this bullshit is actually over, all this "oohh, THIS will end him for sure!" every week is tiring

[–] D_C@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I completely agree.
However, this is exactly what he wants. The more tired we all become of his bullshit and the more we wave it away then the more bullshit he pulls, and gets away with.

If someone, anyone, had given him any consequences to his actions over the past few decades he wouldn't be like he is. If just one person took him outside and beat the living fuck out of him then I feel things would be different.
Things definitely wouldn't be like they are now. They may not be much better, but they would be better.

Again, I agree it's tiring. But I also think we shouldn't give up.
So I hope you, and anyone who reads this, starts to feel less of "this is tiring!" And more of "this is tiring l.. but we can't let that rich obese orange rapist drag me down and get away with it!"

Don't give up!! Fight him. Pull him up on every single thing and ridicule him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] mrslt@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Oh, you mean like how he was impeached in his first term in office and nothing changed?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BubbaGumpsBackLumps@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Yeah lets impeach the already twice impeached president, surely third times the charm... right guys ?

/s

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Derpenheim@lemmy.zip 24 points 1 week ago

Only impeachment that will matter is a vigilante with better aim

[–] WalnutLum@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In 2001 when The US authorized use of force on Al-Qaeda that, along with The 1973 war powers resolution gave the president (as in the position of president, not just Bush) unlimited ability to bomb anyone loosely associated with Al-Qaeda in perpetuity.

It's what allowed Bush, then Obama, then Trump, and then Biden, and now Trump again, to use the military as they see fit for performing military operations against basically any state and group in the middle east.

This is sadly likely the least impeachable thing he's done in office.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] iamjackflack@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oop, that's another impeachable offense in the pile.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 week ago

I see two outcomes:

  • Congress introduces articles
  • Impeached, but fails ratification in senate

or

  • Congress introduces articles
  • Some terrible tragedy befalls us or Israel
  • Articles fail and congress backs the war full-throated

There is no version of this that ends in removal, and even impeachment wouldn't be anything more than performative outrage.

The majority of sitting representatives have been waiting for an acceptable excuse to bomb Iran for decades. The only objection any of them have is doing so without manufacturing consent from voters first, but we've already seen how this plays out with Afghanistan. They'll drum up dubious evidence of WMD's and launch their entry, and then spend 20 years trying to 'get out' while securing Iran's material resources on the way.

The only difference this time is that Iran has almost 5x the population and 100x the GDP of Afghanistan in 2001, plus an actual organized military base with proper advanced weapons manufacturing. There's a reason we've waited this long to actually do this, and it isn't because we were busy doing other things. It's because this isn't a war we can win without pulling everyone else into it (or at the very least without isolating them from global trading partners).

It's not a morbid joke to call this a WWIII softlaunch.

[–] PunkRockSportsFan@fanaticus.social 18 points 1 week ago (7 children)

The corruption of our nation is absolute.

The president is a Nazi.

Thr people working for him are Nazis.

They are carrying out a Nazi agenda.

They are illegally starting wars illegally kidnapping Americans and illegally using our own armed forces against us.

The time for resistance is passed.

It’s time for survival.

[–] outhouseperilous@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. No this is about the time for resistance. We shouldn't just skip that one

[–] witten@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Exactly. I'm so tired of this doomer "we've tried nothing and it hasn't worked" stance on the Trump regime. RESIST, people!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 week ago

If that dude knew how to fucking aim

[–] aramova@infosec.pub 16 points 1 week ago
[–] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't the president allowed 90 days before congress is required?

[–] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Yes, also he didn't declare war. Anyone old enough to remember 9-11 knows what is up.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He can rape 5 year old on a press conference and won't be impeached.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, you can only be impeached for getting a beej (although that was creepy af from an intern) or wearing a tan suit.

Starting wars just won't do it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Lol, no it isn't. Ever since Cold War times, the law has been that the president can not only launch missiles, but even deploy troops on the ground, without congressional approval. There's a limit on how long the troops can be deployed, iirc, but once you've started a ground invasion it's a bit late.

Obviously it's unconstitutional, but there's no legal precedent that would say so. If you think this is the first time this has happened, you really need to learn more about history. The US never formally declared war on Vietnam, for example.

load more comments
view more: next ›