this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2025
585 points (97.9% liked)

Comic Strips

17359 readers
2690 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
585
Wealth Hoarders (lemmus.org)
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by sundray@lemmus.org to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nonentity@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FUCKING_CUNO@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 hours ago

Crazy flick

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

In the Post-Scarcity Era every guy will get a trophy wife!

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

If only it were that easy to cut down billionaires...

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

it only takes about an ounce at 300ft/s

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago

Or a pointy stick at, uh, 15m/s?

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 66 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

Being a billionaire (aka wealth hoarder) is a mental illness.

If they were hoarding anything else to this extent, going way beyond their rational needs, e.g. billions of tables, pokemon cards or toilet papers, everybody would know they are insane. But as it’s money, somehow they are supposed to be the smartest people in the world, and we should worship them.

[–] slaneesh_is_right@lemmy.org 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

If there are 10 monkeys in a zoo and they give them 10 oranges a day as a treat and one of the monkeys would hoard 6 oranges every day and left them to rot. Do you think that the zookeepers would keep an eye on it because it's clearly mentally ill or an asshole, or would they point at it and go: damn, that's one cool and smart monkey.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If the monkey traded the oranges to other monkeys for other treats, or for something intangible like status or privacy, the zookeepers would think it was a cool and smart monkey, but they would think the other monkeys who took the extra oranges in trade and let them rot were less intelligent.

[–] slaacaa@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Great example, makes the contrast even more obvious. Insane people are controlling the world, and we are wondering why it’s going to shit

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 22 hours ago

It's a bad example, because we are not monkeys, we lack zookeepers and money normally rots only at a much, much slower rate than oranges and increases itself over a certain threshold

[–] JacksonLamb@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

This. It's literally no different, and the fact that so many people idolise this kind of hoarding shows how powerful the processes of hegemony are.

[–] ThatGuy46475@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You can’t really do anything useful with a billion Pokémon cards, there’s always something you can do with a billion dollars

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

But you could do lots of useful things with a billion pokemon cards - either bartering them for goods and services or converting them to money first, effectively "spending" the cards on useful things.

But practicality isn't the issue when people see someone hoarding incredible amounts of something - it's the abnormality of devoting yourself to accumulating vastly more than what we interpret as anywhere near normal. We treat hobby objects that way but not money.

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 38 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

unpopular opinion: if most of the current billionaires werent this rich or lucky they would just act like normal people

[–] shplane@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago

And if normal people suddenly became billionaires, they’d act just as awful as the current billionaires

[–] AreaKode@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As in, they're power tripping? Absolutely. When you get a false sense of importance, especially when you have sycophants reinforcing this image, narcissists in particular tend to act poorly toward their fellow human beings.

This is one of the best reasons to socially stigmatize wealth hoarding, even if you can't change the fundamentals of the capitalist system that causes it in the first place.

If enough people make people who hoard money feel lesser than, to the point that having less is a preferable alternative, then they're more likely to give away their wealth and become at least a little bit less shitty people.

This is also, coincidentally, why rich people isolate themselves within bubbles of similarly rich individuals, who won't look down on them for being so greedy and narcissistic.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is why we should have mandatory testing for NPD and be institutionalising anyone who tests positive. Narcissists cannot be allowed to walk the streets freely, their mental illness is too dangerous.

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe -4 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Narcissistic Personality Disorder. A narcissist is someone with NPD. And they all deserve the gas chamber treatment.

[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

they all deserve the gas chamber treatment

O_o

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 0 points 19 hours ago (3 children)

People with certain mental disorders aren't fit to live in society. Donald Trump is proof of that. And if you think we should extend mercy to people with his disorder, you're defending a fascist.

[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 1 points 49 minutes ago

Was also a narcissist. He literally told people to worship him. He probably only fed the hungry and healed the sick for attention.

[–] tjsauce@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And your solution, killing everyone in a category, isn't fascistic?

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe -1 points 12 hours ago

Narcissists aren't people

[–] trashgirlfriend@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

You mean psychos like thay V.I. Lenin guy?

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe -2 points 12 hours ago

Psychopaths should also be institutionalised. And autists.

[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 12 points 1 day ago

And the inverse statement too: If normal people became billionaires, they would act stupidly too

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

This is almost wholesome, imagine if it were that easy to regulate greed

[–] prex@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The solution might not be easy but it is simple: tax. Good on the cuurent Australian governments increased taxation of superannuation over 3 million $.

[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 22 hours ago

There should be an income maximum. It should be a little above the maximum happiness threshold. Any income above that should be taxed at 95%

[–] Onionguy@lemm.ee 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Imagine if people who really should go to therapy (like melon usk in this one) actually went to therapy.

[–] Mothra@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that too. And not just about greed