this post was submitted on 05 May 2025
751 points (95.7% liked)

World News

46414 readers
2686 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Good job working class Japan 👏 full support burn the tyranny of the rich down. Starting a Global workering class revolt 👊

[–] rasakaf679@lemmy.ml 17 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You miss spelled it... Its not quiet quitting... Its doing what's necessary and nothing excess.. if you aren't paid for it

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

Exactly. Workers are doing their jobs! Gasp!

[–] drspawndisaster@sh.itjust.works 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Considering that work ethic literally killed people: Good.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 6 hours ago

"kills" ... This is still occurring, let's use the present tense.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Man, fuck all those guys for doing their job to a sufficient quality and quantity to not get fired, eh?

[–] toastmeister@lemmy.ca -1 points 11 hours ago

Well productivity is a good thing, I think the problem is the incentives. Their government essentially funnels all the money to their elderly via monetary policy, and the youth get the table scraps.

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 56 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I fucking hate the 'quiet quitting' term. It puts the onus on the people who are tired of the inhumane hours and treatment, and the accompanying meager pay. Instead of putting it on the companies and government whose policies and ethics are fostering these awful conditions which engender these sorts of worker responses. It's not quiet quitting. It's holding boundaries between work and personal life. It's not allowing the company to steal your time away from you. It's preventing the company from overstepping their position in your life. It's so many things that are important and 'quiet quitting' does those people a disservice in favor of a catchy corporate approved soundbite. I find that disgusting.

[–] tfowinder@lemmy.ml 16 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I did not find any proper meaning of phrase quiet quitting

It might as well mean - working only the amount you are paid for - which sounds totally reasonable.

Totally corporate worded article.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

It's a phrase meant to replace the old phrase "working your wage", because that way of viewing it makes the whole situation less dramatic and more noble … and generates less clicks. Classic newsspeak.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 8 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

I always took it to mean "doing the least amount of work possible without getting fired." If someone's making an effort to work the amount they're paid for, I wouldn't consider it quiet quitting.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

You can define it that way, but the problem is that the authors of the article didn't give a definition. For example, I think they think the term means to do what's in your job description and contract. And they think that workers should be going above and beyond that. But if they were forced to spell it out, then people would ask why companies don't change the job description or contract, because obviously it's ridiculous to ask people to do what you didn't ask them to do.

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

We used to just call it Work to Rule.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

FYI the "Japanese crazy long hours and hard work ethic" BS only applies to corporate jobs.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/average-work-week-by-country

[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 day ago

we should normalize to punch everyone in the gut who uses the words "quiet quitting".

[–] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 41 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (12 children)

Heh, I've seen this personally. I work for a Japanese company, and part of my job is coordinating tooling installations with the factory I'm stationed at (pick a chip fab in the US, I've probably been there). When we get a tool onsite, I get an install team directly from our factory in Japan who handles all the physical installation aspects. They work hard, efficiently, and with the utmost care for the finer details (some of these tools are expected to last 20+ years - we have a few that have been in production for nearly as long with very little fuss). Occasionally, they will finish their tasks early the last couple days and take off after lunch, letting me know of this beforehand and that their daily reports will be sent to me and other relevant managers at the "usual" time, with a wink and a nod.

I don't care how much time they clock, as long as shit gets done properly. Haven't had any issues.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Croquette@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It was probably higher before, but it wasn't as acceptable to say it as it is today.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

You're basically right. Back when unions were a thing, they dubbed this behavior "working your wage" I.e. not volunteering for unpaid labor. "Quiet quitting" is a neologism designed by a think tank to shift the burden of responsibility to the employee

[–] MetalMachine@feddit.nl 35 points 1 day ago

The Japanese work ethic doesn't even make sense and does more harm than good. If you don't have time for yourself or family the society will collapse (already happening). To be clear, I'm not talking about being diligent work, but working 8+ hours every single day.

Many Japanese don't leave work at 5pm even though those are the official business hours because it's rude to leave before the boss leaves. So people stay at work until 7 or 8pm. Many times having to also go drinking with co-workers or the boss. So, depending on the day, you may end up with 1-2 hours for yourself. No wonder they aren't having children, and depression rates are sky high.

Same applies to Korea.

[–] tamman2000@lemm.ee 54 points 1 day ago

This is what happens in societies that have increasing income inequality.

Why should workers feel compelled to bust their asses when it benefits their bosses, but not themselves?

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 189 points 2 days ago (18 children)

Fuck the term quiet quitting. Call it what it is, doing your job.

[–] Rooty@lemmy.world 48 points 1 day ago

Employee burnout is a symptom of a toxic work culture, and "quiet quitting" is a corporate psyop invented to prevent you from noticing it.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 1 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

"Quiet quitting" is not a trend. Like, at all. If you have a coworker that doesn't want to do their job, your employer has a shitty employee. That's it, an isolated incident. The term itself is basically the same as boomers screeching about how "nobody wants to work anymore"...

[–] CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works 12 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

nobody wants to work anymore

I just fire back with "nobody wants to pay us anymore" now.

[–] Ordinary_Person@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago

Someone recently used that dumb phrase when telling me about not being able to get timely service at a restaurant. I said to them, "Well maybe they would want to if they were paid honest wages for honest work?" and we haven't talked since. I don't think we're going to be friends anymore.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 12 hours ago

I think it’s a bit of a misnomer. It’s not that people are abandoning their jobs, it’s that they are abandoning the toxic mindset that says line must go up, that good people are good worker drones for their superiors, etc. It’s more like quitting your career but keeping your job even if in a half-assed way.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

If you have a coworker that doesn’t want to do their job, your employer has a shitty employee.

I think it's less that people don't want to do any work at all or less than the "minimum" (except for some rare cases), and more that people are doing only the minimum, not putting in any extra effort, not going above and beyond - because their salaries are stagnating, their employers are only paying them the minimum and not a cent more, and their extra efforts are going unrecognized. Ask me how I know. I have seen it myself personally, multiple times at multiple companies, and I have seen it through my friends experiences as well.

In unions, it's called work-to-rule. Most jobs/companies don't have unions, so we get "quiet quitting" instead. The more conditions stay the same, or the worse they become, the worse the "quiet quitting" becomes.

If you want to motivate your employees, reward them. Give them something to strive towards. Reward their extra efforts! Don't just give them the bare minimum and hope that they will keep going above and beyond for you, because that's not realistic and it's not sustainable.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Thank goodness. Now when im napping during work I can feel less guilty thinking about Japan doing it too.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When you're napping, know that someone in Japan is also asleep, but largely because of the time change.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 215 points 2 days ago (21 children)

From what I’ve read, Japan’s work ethic has been more about presenteeism than productivity for a while. While long hours are the norm, it’s more important to be seen to be working than to be productive, so you don’t leave before the boss does, but you do spend a large amount of that time staring out the window or otherwise idling.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›