this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
284 points (99.3% liked)

World News

48449 readers
1787 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sonor@lemmy.world 53 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Why not 3522? I think that would really drive the point home

[–] huquad@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 months ago

You know I wasn't going to say it, but 3522 also isn't convincing to me. They'll still be two times cheaper than local options.

[–] jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works 42 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

You know what's funnier? I mean, it's not funny, but it also kind of is. At the same time, the Trump administration is pushing coal burning power plants. Aside from the high levels of pollution, including greenhouse gas emissions that coal plants produce, no one in the US is building new coal fired power plants. Twenty years ago, coal generated over 50% of the electric power in the US. Now it's less than 20%.

Even if they were, it takes years and a huge investment, including getting rail access to the plant, to even bring one online. Electric utilities spread their capital outlays over decades rather than years. So I would expect that convincing the industry to switch back to coal, with the understanding that they'll have to maintain new coal fired plants for the next 40 years, is going to be a nonstarter.

All tarrifing solar panels will do is push power utilities toward natural gas and exacerbate the (actually legitimate) issue of insufficient base load generation capacity that they've been whining about for years. Oh, and also kill residential solar projects.

Long way of saying this action will continue to weaken our already strained energy infrastructure. You could try to incentivise domestically produced solar panels. But this is not how you would do that.

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 months ago

So what you are saying is that the US can look forward to South African style load shedding schedules for a few decades?

[–] keegomatic@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Tenty years ago

Actually, after “ninety” comes “one hundred”

[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

well, at that point the numbers lose their meaning.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, I don't understand (amongst many other things) why distinguish between 3,500% and 3,521%? What insane sum was used it generate that figure?

Also, at this point a part that costs $10 is now $362.10. Is there any point using tariffs here rather than just making them illegal?

[–] madame_gaymes@programming.dev 9 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Rich people can still buy them for their offgrid bunkers without having to bribe the court system this way.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
[–] univers3man@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

How many assholes do we have on this ~~ship~~ administration?

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So many people didn't expect the insanity to return.

I have no idea why, other than I suppose they were too young the first time around.

[–] eronth@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Yeah maybe the youngest voters have that excuse kinda. Like, they were at least 14 at the end of his first term, which had plenty of shit go down, but most voters should be old enough to remember what fucking happened last time.

[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Most people live in their own ass

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

I mean I hope it’s just you in there.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 2 months ago
[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

At first, I thought it was 3 point 521 percent because we use "comma" for decimal points and "period" for thousand separators.

Nvm it is over 3000 percents !! Might as try 9999 % and make a meme out of it.

FFS which world lines are we on?

[–] decapitae@sh.itjust.works 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

And people think there's no conspiracy from the oil companies.... Maybe instead of gasoline, we should try to use oil executives to make our cars go?

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

Blubber from domestically grown land whales is an abundant resource in the US.

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Some solar equipment exporters in Cambodia face the highest duties of 3,521% because of what was seen as a lack of cooperation with the Commerce Department investigation.

Products made in Malaysia by Chinese manufacturer Jinko Solar faced some of the lowest duties of just over 41%.

Another China-based firm, Trina Solar, faces tariffs of 375% for the products it makes in Thailand]Neither company immediately responded to requests for comment from BBC News.

[–] IAmJacksRage@lemm.ee 11 points 2 months ago

It’s called a self-embargo

[–] Kualdir@feddit.nl 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That's a comically high and specific %

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

You are 654,863,108% correct!

[–] lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

The number looks like someone used 4 dices....

[–] terminhell@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Why not just outright ban the import and sale of the items?

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

I'll buy their solar panels, just make sure it doesn't depend on sun. We don't have sun in Belgium