this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
1154 points (99.1% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30983 readers
3783 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ArtificialHoldings@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Everyone in this post is the annoying IT person who says "why don't you just run Linux?" to people who don't even fully understand what an OS is in the first place.

[–] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

This is why no one can find anything on Google anymore, they don't know how to google shit.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 22 points 9 hours ago

People Google questions like that? I would have looked up "Heat" in either Wikipedia or imdb and checked the cast list. Or gone to Jolie's Wikipedia or imdb pages to see if Heat is listed

[–] nickiam2@aussie.zone 70 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I think the trick here is to not use Google. The Wikipedia page for the movie heat is the first result on DuckDuckGo

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

I think the trick is to put the word "movie"

[–] zaphod@sopuli.xyz 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can also search Wikipedia directly.

[–] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

PSA for Firefox/fork users, click the button to the left of the search bar after clicking blank space in the search bar, you'll get a list of choices besides just your primary selection. You can add more:

[–] BigPotato@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, first part of any fresh Fox setup is changing the default search engine.

[–] ___@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago

Yup, using the bang !w anywhere within the search

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I use duck duck go as well. I wish it wasn't just anonymised Bing search. One of these days I'll look into an open source independent search engine.

[–] xx3rawr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

I haven't used Bing in a while but I alternate between Ecosia and DDG, supposedly Bing as their main provider. I find more and more differences between them nowadays so I do feel DuckDuckBot and Qwant partnership are doing their thing. I'm optimistic about both of them broadening their sources as they state in their websites.

[–] kalpol@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

That's what I use, it's still just using other search engines to get results though.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BuboScandiacus@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

DDG also has a quick answer AI

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 hours ago

It does?? I was using Brave because it had AI

(And also because so many websites are censored on DDG for some reason)

[–] nickiam2@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Its does, but its less annoying and actually has an off switch

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How can she be fertile if her ovaries are removed?

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because you're not getting an answer to a question, you're getting characters selected to appear like they statistically belong together given the context.

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A sentence saying she had her ovaries removed and that she is fertile don't statistically belong together, so you're not even getting that.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You think that because you understand the meaning of words. LLM AI doesn't. It uses math and math doesn't care that it's contradictory, it cares that the words individually usually came next in it's training data.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Cordyceps@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

And the text even ends with a mention of her being in early menopause...

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 117 points 1 day ago (12 children)

Why do people Google questions anyway? Just search "heat cast" or "heat Angelina Jolie". It's quicker to type and you get more accurate results.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 143 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 5 points 1 day ago

"You can just type your search in the top bar! You don't have to go to www.google.com."

As an IT guy, I know what to expect when I get to hell.

[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 12 points 1 day ago

Why use many word when few work

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I just tested. "Angelina jolie heat" gives me tons of shit results, I have to scroll all the way down and then click on "show more results" in order to get the filmography.

"Is angelina jolie in heat" gives me this bluesky post as the first answer and the wikipedia and IMDb filmographies as 2nd and 3rd answer.

So, I dunno, seems like you're wrong.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago

both queries give me poor results and searching "heat cast" reveals that she is not actually in the movie, so that's probably why you can't find anything useful

[–] howrar@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have people just completely forgot how search engines work? If you search for two things and get shit results, it means those two things don't appear together.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

it's truly shocking how bad people are at seeking information. It literally took me 20 seconds to discover she's not in the movie heat.

[–] nyctre@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I mean, when even people on Lemmy (who are supposed to be a bit more tech literate and stuff) insist that the solution is cutting a couple 2 letter words from your search query to make everything much shorter and efficient, are you even surprised?

I've been thinking for a while that people seem to be getting dumber and it might actually be true I don't think that it's a coincidence that fascism and other forms of conservatism seem to be on the rise pretty much everywhere in the world.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because that's the normal way in which humans communicate.

But for Google more specifically, that sort of keyword prompts is how you searched stuff in the '00s... Nowadays the search prompt actually understands natural language, and even has features like "people also ask" that are related to this.

All in all, do whatever works for you, it's just that asking questions isn't bad.

[–] stebo02@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 day ago (16 children)

Google is not a human so why would you communicate with it as if it were a human? unlike chatgpt it's not designed to answer questions, it's designed to search for words on webpages

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] ERROR_100_000_100@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"How to to describe a character in my story hiding a body after they committed a murder?"

⬇️

"killed someone, how to hide body?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] warbond@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

As a funny challenge I like to come up with simplified, stupid-sounding, 3-word search queries for complex questions, and more often than not it's good enough to get me the information I'm looking for.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] daerion@feddit.org 234 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Google was fine as it was before, now it does shit like this. I hate how AI is shoved down our throats. And the results on google nowadays feel so much worse and generic than a few years ago. That isn't just a feeling I have, right?

[–] Dettweiler42@lemmy.dbzer0.com 92 points 1 day ago (9 children)

Add obscenities to your search for the most optimized results. It drops the AI component and seems to provide the more direct results we used to get.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 62 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They’re an ad company that just happens to offer search as a way to show ads.

Their ideal scenario is one where you search forever and never find what you were looking for.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Bongles@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You've sullied my quick answer:

The assistant figures it out though:

[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Maybe that's why ai had trouble determining anything about AJ & the movie Heat, because she's wasn't even in it!

[–] wander1236@sh.itjust.works 104 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Wouldn't removing your ovaries and fallopian tubes make you not "fertile" by definition?

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yes, it contradicts itself within the next couple of sentences.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Is it considered normal to type out a normal question format when using search engines?

If I were looking for an answer instead of making a funny meme, I'd search "heat movie cast Angelina Jolie" if I didn't feel like putting any effort in.

Then again, I guess I shouldn't be surprised. I've seen someone use their phone to search google "what is 87÷167?" instead of doing "87/167" or like... Opening the calculator....

People do things in different, sometimes weird ways.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 63 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It also contradicts itself immediately, saying she’s fertile, then immediately saying she’s had her ovaries removed end that she’s reached menopause.

NGL, I learned some things.

load more comments
view more: next ›