this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
588 points (99.5% liked)

World News

41621 readers
4850 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced retaliatory tariffs after Donald Trump confirmed 25% tariffs on Canadian goods and 10% on energy, set to take effect at 12:01 a.m. Tuesday.

Trump justified the move by linking it to fentanyl smuggling concerns.

Trudeau called the tariffs "unjustified" and imposed 25% tariffs on $155 billion in U.S. goods, with $30 billion effective immediately and the rest in 21 days.

He warned of price hikes and job losses in the U.S., arguing the move violates Trump’s own trade agreement from his last term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kimmy@lemmy.world 2 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Excuse my ignorance but wouldn't that make things more expensive for Canadians as well?

[–] yes_this_time@lemmy.world 2 points 23 minutes ago

Yes, but items are targeted to inflict the least amount of pain. We don't neeed orange juice or bourbon for example.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago

American here.

100% support you Canada. Keep it up.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 200 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (4 children)

I like Cory Doctorow’s plan.

The reason Canada got tariff-free access to sell to the US in the first place? Canada agreed to enforce penalties for tampering with digital locks, following the premise of the Digital Milennium Copyright Act.

If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

Doctorow advocating for this plan:

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago

If the US is going back on the deal, then Canada should too. Make it legal to jailbreak all US tech.

That should be considered with plans for further escalation varying from nothing to an embargo.

Though arguably piracy and jailbreaking are not so bad for said domination. Microsoft practically encouraged piracy in ex-USSR at some point. Piracy solves the availability problem, supports market share, leads to short-term loss in sales but long-term growth.

But that's Microsoft, while US government in general seems to think DMCA is for them what the Sound was for the Danish crown in middle ages.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 54 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Heck, make it legal to pirate all American media.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Hit where it really hurts: stop paying Microsoft.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 20 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

A surprising amount of 'American' media is filmed and produced in Canada. ~~Toronto~~ Vancouver is like Hollywood North. This would probably be a footgun

[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 minutes ago* (last edited 19 minutes ago)

Producers like to film in Toronto while pretending that it's NYC. X-Men and What We Do In The Shadows are the first things that come to mind. I still find it hilarious that the "Westchester" Train Station in X1 is in Hamilton (I believe)

A more subtle crossover is that Ramona (Scott Pilgrim) is from NYC

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

No problems, make exceptions for anything that was made involving Canada!

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Vancouver is a huge TV filming location as well.

[–] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh, I feel like a dummy. I was picturing BC in my mind and typed out Toronto. You're 100% correct about Vancouver

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Toronto is used for pretty much any scenes set in NYC though

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Stargate SG-1, full of blatant military propaganda (I know it's not so bad, but), was filmed there.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It already basically is; Anti-piracy laws in Canada don't have a lot of teeth. I leave my torrent computer running 24 hours a day to seed and I don't even get emails anymore after switching to a smaller service provider.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

In that case, the Candian government should set up an official service for downloading American stuff. Making it easy to find things would be worth a nominal fee for a lot of people.

[–] lance20000@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 hours ago

Yeah, I'm not too concerned about that. Their courts are being attacked with so much that I'm pretty sure downloading a car isn't going to be high on their list.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They could also make their own play store and apple store, and could charge the developers much lower fees, for the same apps that would work anywhere. It would cost them very little and be nothing but profit.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

The fact that both Apple and d Google fail to keep malware off their stores makes me think it’s maybe not so easy.

[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Im pretty sure i watched him say this on democracy now and he was a great listen

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 3 points 4 hours ago

Yep, I caught that one too. He’s a fantastic orator. He’s got an endless arsenal of one-liners.

I added a link to that and some other instances where he’s made this argument.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 106 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Trump is such a vindictive moron. Whether he's a Russian asset or just a certifiably stupid, the end result is the same.

Good god I hate this fucking timeline. Fuck corporate America for backing this monster and fuck everyone who voted for him. Fuck the Democrats for collectively shrugging about all this too.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Whether he’s a Russian asset or just certifiably stupid

Most definitely both.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, if he was just in it for his own aggrandisement, none of this would make sense. The orders are very clearly coming from Moscow here, because only Putin benefits from all this bullshit.

[–] samus12345@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

And he's stupid for going along with it - a smart Russian asset US president would get something in return other than a pat on the head.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 14 points 6 hours ago (5 children)

Ok I've been wanting to ask this and all the articles don't really address it so I'm confused.

The whole rhetoric is that Trump's tariffs will impact the citizens with increased prices and it's really just going to cause economic harm. Like cool, I can understand that. But why is Canada then performing the same action effecting their citizens? I get it's retaliatory, and suppose to expedite (hopefully) a return to normal trade policy. I just don't get why this is the move when it's a bad move in the first place (two wrongs don't make a right and all). Please be gentle, I'm honestly just confused.

[–] Hacksaw@lemmy.ca 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Trump's tariffs are universal. Meaning that even in cases where the only practical option is Canada, for example potash, they have to suffer a direct 25% price increase.

The Canadian tariffs are highly selective, we only tariff goods that have alternate non US suppliers at similar prices. In this case the tariffs would mostly reduce market competition without directly affecting price.

I think the better approach is to not enforced the digital lock aspects of the free trade agreement and have Canada be a leading repairer of farm and industrial equipment.

[–] cornshark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Doesn't Belarus also produce potash? I thought they were dropping sanctions against them to get it

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 1 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 32 minutes ago)

I mean yeah, but Canada produces an ENORMOUS percentage of the world's potash.

Edit: checked the numbers. Canada produced ~38% of the worlds potash (25mil lbs), while Belarus produced 5-7mil lbs, most of which already goes to China, Russia, and India. Canada exports 46% of our potash to the US, meaning the US could buy ALL of belarus' potash and still not meet current supply.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 34 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

There really aren't any other moves to take. It's either this or lie down.

Also, I will say that tariffs can be a lot easier to manage if you only implement them against one of your trading partners. While major imports from that trading partner, and any goods produced with any of those imports, will see a price hike, most Western countries have very diversified economies and can make up the difference elsewhere. The real trouble begins when you start having blanket tariffs affecting all of your major trade partners, which seems to be Trump's plan.

[–] healthetank@lemmy.ca 1 points 29 minutes ago

It's still going to hurt - we import so much from the US that this is going to impact Canadians no matter what (even before price hikes in unrelated businesses starts).

[–] Spur4383@lemmy.world 28 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If the tariffs are taylored correctly they can cause more pain in the US while minimizing cost to Canada. For example, us grain is not cheap and you can make it so that Canada buys from other countries at a similar cost. This will hurt farmers in the US (a key group for Trump) while not really hiring Canada.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cenotaph@mander.xyz 18 points 6 hours ago

My understanding is that when the americans institute their tariffs, all canadian products become more expensive for americans and not price competitive with local american products. This results in a decrease of purchasing from Canada.

If we do nothing, then Canadians are still buying just as much american as before and there are little to no consequences for the tariffs

With tariffs on both sides, the effect is roughly "equalized" in that we are both now buying more local goods and less trade over the border

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 24 points 7 hours ago

I was going to buy an item but the price went up since yesterday. Not going to buy it now. It's his tax on us. Not going to finance Krasnov's destruction of America.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

should double those tariffs.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 47 minutes ago (1 children)

If Trump escalates, so do we.

If we go "all in" on day one, we don't have any future leverage.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 30 minutes ago)

you are right, got to strategically tariff so it hurts US but with minimal impact on Canada.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 59 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

We need to really turn the screws into the U.S. Along with applying tariffs, we also need to just outright stop delivery of critical materials they need. Full Stop.

I’m know this is just a sounding board, but honestly I’d love to see the cutting off of any and all essential raw materials they need. I’m sure they can source it elsewhere, but they most likely can’t get enough of it fast enough.

Cut off anything they need for energy and more importantly: agriculture.

People can live without power. Make their stomachs ache.

Trump is a diseased cunt who doesn’t understand what happens when things don’t go his own way. Let’s show him.

[–] BassTurd@lemmy.world 18 points 7 hours ago

I said it before. Stop sending aluminum and steel and aerospace and military manufacturing would suffer immensely. That is 90%+ of all good made, metals have strict import requirements and certifications, and we couldn't just make our own on a whim.

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 41 points 8 hours ago

The Beaverton had as a headline a few weeks back along the lines of "Americans choose the most expensive way to figure out what they purchase from Canada" which I thought was appropriate.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›