I would bet on LLMs being around and continuing to be useful for some subset of coding in 10 years.
I would not bet my retirement funds on current AI related companies.
I would bet on LLMs being around and continuing to be useful for some subset of coding in 10 years.
I would not bet my retirement funds on current AI related companies.
I would agree that the interest will wain in some domains where they aren't aiding in productivity.
But LLMs for coding are productive right now in other domains and people aren't going to want to give that up.
Inference is already financially viable.
Now, I think what could crush the SOTA models is if they get sued into bankruptcy for copyright violations. Which is a related but separate thread.
Ahh spoiler, just started reading this
What do you expect to replace LLM coding?
Radiohead's response seems quite reasonable.
I'm pretty sure the UK GDP was comparable to Germanies pre WW2 if that's what you are referring to. I agree with your point though. If I was Carney I wouldn't take it head on, but instead work behind the scenes to better position Canada.
NDP is not a right wing party
It makes me a bit sad that there is a whole article on a (very likely) mirage
Thanks this seems like really good information. I've never heard of this...
73 violations involving slave labour, 1 with child labour, am I reading that right?
500 million was specific to Claude Code, they are at 5 billion annual run rate and growing
They may not be useful to you... but you can't speak for everyone.
You are incorrect on inference costs. But yes training models is expensive and the economics are concerning.