this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
324 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2552 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not obligated to perform abortions under a longstanding national emergency-care law, dealing a blow to the White House's strategy to ensure access to the procedure after the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AquaTofana@lemmy.world 126 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And they claim that they "don't hate women they just love babies! <3 <3"

I am disgusted, but not surprised.

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They just hate their political opposition.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago (9 children)

They love everything their media tells them to.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] bane_killgrind@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Love dying babies, dead moms****

Because moms aren't women, they are moms!!!/s

[–] ettyblatant@lemmy.world 87 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Ok, to get this straight: cops do not need to protect, nor serve, and doctors do not need to save your life. I suppose life guards will get to decide whether or not they will grab a drowning child. Maybe the bathing suit is distasteful? If someone is in the street, I don't have to stop unless I am fully comfortable doing so; I paid for my car and I shouldn't have to risk damaging it by running someone over.

What are regulations even for? God, the government is so useless!

Hard /s

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 41 points 10 months ago (1 children)
  • The conservative government is useless
[–] kromem@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It's not useless, it's actively harmful.

Useless would be not providing funding for public health initiatives around contraception and abortions.

But actively preventing adults from making life changing medical decisions for themselves is worse than useless, it's harmful.

Conservatives have been so committed to "the scariest words are the government saying I'm here to help" that they now aggressively make sure the government hurts people.

The Republican party needs to go the way of the Whigs.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Mango@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Just think of what it'll do to all your precious momentum you already built up when you press the brakes!

Relevant: https://youtu.be/N7zFRHel4uw?si=kN2ljHCOmhF8BpSJ

[–] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 66 points 10 months ago

Well that's fucking sickening

[–] Tosti@feddit.nl 56 points 10 months ago (6 children)

"Some of you may die, but that's a risk I'm willing to take."

Poor women.

But a prime example what failing to codify into law does. The pro choice lawmakers failed all these decades to actually create robust laws protecting women's reproductive choice and health. Then Roe fell and there was nothing to hold back the hordes of Christian zealots waiting in the wings. Their intent was clear as some states even had trigger laws that would enact the moment Roe fell.

You see that now there is a scurry to create several laws that should curtail the president's power, as certain limits existed based on decency, decorum and shame. Now that decency, decorum and shame no longer play a role in politics, only hard and explicit rules help.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (4 children)

They never did anything because roe was rock fucking solid!!! Scotus had to literally show how corrupt they were by completely ignoring the 9th and the 14th amendments. They basically completely destroyed 50 years of jurisprudence and literally lied in their Dobbs reasoning.

Stop pretending any fucking law on the books would have stopped these ghouls.

[–] Tosti@feddit.nl 19 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Except it wasn't law, only jurisprudence. And many law scholars warned about the exact scenario that unfolded.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 10 months ago

They never did anything because roe was rock fucking solid!!!

No, it wasn't. It was always just one bad decision away from crumbling, one that was always imminent because while it might be good policy, it was a bad decision from a legal standpoint. Any decision built on implied rights drawn from the shadows cast by other legal rights is inherently going to be on shaky ground, because determining what exactly those implied rights are is like reading tea leaves.

It doesn't help that a lot of the arguments, positions and implied rights surrounding abortion seem to only apply in that context.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] crsu@lemmy.world 50 points 10 months ago

Death panels are real in TX

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The 5th Circuit: when you need a less legitimate court than SCOTUS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The Hippocrite’s Oath:

First- allow harm.

[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (6 children)

Is there such a thing as murder by inaction? As in you could have prevented a death by taking action, and you didn't? Sounds like this might be it.

[–] ITypeWithMyDick@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Social Murder could be the term, but there may be a more suited one.

Social murder (German: sozialer Mord) is the unnatural death that occurs due to social, political, or economic oppression.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_murder

[–] TipRing@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

In Texas it's called Negligent Homicide.

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Yes, very much. Like murder by homeless sweeps destroying life saving medications. But out society accepts that much more than something like a classical murder.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 33 points 10 months ago (8 children)

A sick part of me is happy that these states are going insane. I can’t wait for a redneck to start crying when his wife dies because his already dead-in-the-womb baby still counts as a baby, and the doctor says, “gosh, that’s an abortion! I can’t do that because of your vote”

[–] Shirasho@lemmings.world 51 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that they will never acknowledge that they were the ones that caused them to get to that point. That is why we are here today.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

Some will admit it. When it affects them.

But the number actually affected isn't enough to sway elections. And the rest have zero empathy for others or foresight so won't care unless they are impacted.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

True, they can’t smell their own shit on their knees.

[–] ElBarto@sh.itjust.works 9 points 10 months ago

It's hard to smell the shit on your knees when you've got your head up someone's ass.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 32 points 10 months ago (4 children)

A lot of people are going to be hurt and killed in the meantime.

I'd have preferred to not see that happen in the first place

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The redneck will probably just scream Obamacare killed his wife then go vote for Trump even if he isn't on the ballot that year.

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago

Most likely.

[–] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The people who pass this legislation can afford to covertly leave the state they ruined for a blue one.

Unfortunately there is no sadistic pleasure here except what they feel when women are deprived of their bodily atonomy, pushing them one step closer to property, to be bartered to people with power like them. It's the only way to permanently reverse the trend of men growing up left of center, keeping young misguided boys incels losers forever as opposed to switching belief systems the moment they have to start appealing at all to women.

[–] fluxion@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

That happened hundreds of times with COVID, didn't change a thing. The GOP does not serve constituents, it's the other way around.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

First, do ~~no~~ some harm.

[–] gearheart@lemm.ee 19 points 10 months ago

I still do not understand how lawmakers are allowed to practice medicine without a doctorate.

[–] Drusas@kbin.social 14 points 10 months ago

Having just read it, I am extremely disappointed to know that the Hippocratic oath doesn't mention anything about failing to provide care when it's necessary.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Be kind to these people when they come to seek asylum in your state. People can change and learn from their mistakes (in the case that they voted these reps in, they might not even regret it but honey and vinegar right?)

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

46% of Texans voted for Biden. Before the election, there were (wishful) talks of Texas becoming purple. It's much more blue than Florida, for example. But, the gerrymandering is pretty egregious.

Here's one district that contains black neighborhoods in both San Antonio and Austin, which are about 100 miles apart.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is the paradox of tolerance. You don't need to show kindness to those who would sooner spit on you for no greater reason than that they hate you for being born or the circumstances of your life.

People can change, but being given a second chance is a privilege and not a right. If you fuck up badly enough, no one is obligated to forgive you. Plenty of us make it through our whole lives without being fearful little shits who dedicate our votes to hurting others. I have no tolerance for those who can't manage that, and they're LUCKY to get a second chance, not guaranteed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I disagree. Conservatives cannot "change and learn". If they could, they would not be conservatives. They may temporarily pretend to change when it benefits them. But, that should not be confused with actual change or growth.

Conservatives delight in the misery, oppression and death of others. It is who they are at their core. Be extremely careful dealing with them. They do not value the lives of others the way normal people do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Texas is a garbage state in a shithole of a country.

[–] iquanyin@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

evil goes by the name “far right” currently

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

That's not even far right. That's the mainstream right

[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Do we just take them out back and put them down now?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›