this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2024
324 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19135 readers
2029 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal appeals court on Tuesday ruled that Texas hospitals and doctors are not obligated to perform abortions under a longstanding national emergency-care law, dealing a blow to the White House's strategy to ensure access to the procedure after the Supreme Court overturned the constitutional right to abortion in 2022.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Be kind to these people when they come to seek asylum in your state. People can change and learn from their mistakes (in the case that they voted these reps in, they might not even regret it but honey and vinegar right?)

[–] 31337@sh.itjust.works 39 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

46% of Texans voted for Biden. Before the election, there were (wishful) talks of Texas becoming purple. It's much more blue than Florida, for example. But, the gerrymandering is pretty egregious.

Here's one district that contains black neighborhoods in both San Antonio and Austin, which are about 100 miles apart.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is so fucking terrible. How is this democratic.

[–] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

✨*it's not ~~*✨

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 10 months ago

Just another example of why we need district lines to be assigned by an explicit mathematical process rather than politicians deciding what will best let them retain power.

Least split line is an example of an attempt at that (basically if you have an even number of districts to split into, draw the shortest line across the region that splits the population into an even number of people on each side and put half the districts on each side. If odd, then do almost the same, except instead of an even split, one side gets the extra "share" of people and the extra district to split into. Repeat the process for each piece until you have one district on each side of the line.

For example, if a state has 5 seats, then draw the shortest line that puts 60% of the population on one side and 40% on the other (a 3:2 ratio). Then for the 40% side, draw the shortest line across it that splits the population in half. For the 60% side, you draw the shortest line that produces a 2:1 split, then the shortest line across the 2 side that splits the population evenly. Each district now contains 20% of the population, all drawn without regard to or consideration of political affiliations or identity groups, and all generally pretty compact. Inconvenient if you want to ensure your party's continued power or create "majority minority" districts, but then those aren't the goals (and are actually antithetical to the goal of preventing gerrymandering).

[–] MamboGator@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

This is the paradox of tolerance. You don't need to show kindness to those who would sooner spit on you for no greater reason than that they hate you for being born or the circumstances of your life.

People can change, but being given a second chance is a privilege and not a right. If you fuck up badly enough, no one is obligated to forgive you. Plenty of us make it through our whole lives without being fearful little shits who dedicate our votes to hurting others. I have no tolerance for those who can't manage that, and they're LUCKY to get a second chance, not guaranteed.

[–] stevedidWHAT@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ah I was confused at first I was like you’re describing the solution to that paradox, but then I think your intended meaning clicked

It’s an interesting thought experiment until, like you mentioned, you consider tolerance is only for those who are themselves tolerant.

Either you play in this ball park or you don’t, simple as that

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I disagree. Conservatives cannot "change and learn". If they could, they would not be conservatives. They may temporarily pretend to change when it benefits them. But, that should not be confused with actual change or growth.

Conservatives delight in the misery, oppression and death of others. It is who they are at their core. Be extremely careful dealing with them. They do not value the lives of others the way normal people do.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world -4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is so insanely short sighted but I guess user name checks out lol

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Lol so you're telling me in the last 300 years (and I have absolutely no idea where you're pulling that time frame from) not one single conservative has ever changed or learned from their mistakes. 100% of them are just pure evil and "delight in the misery, oppression, and death of others."

On top of that you're also saying these are core values of these people, meaning the same holds true for any current and future conservatives. They're all pure evil and utterly incapable of change or learning anything.... Permanently.

I not a fan at all of conservatives by and large but I know plenty level headed non-bat shit crazy conservatives and (to my knowledge) they do not hold a party any time people die or someone gets oppressed lol.

This doesn't sound the least bit strange to you?

[–] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hope my blue state builds a fucking wall.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 8 points 10 months ago

I am in NM sand Texas is currently building a wall on our border. I am unsure if they are lost, or are trying to keep people from fleeing their state.