this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2024
158 points (94.9% liked)

World News

32379 readers
500 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said Kyiv would like to end the war with Russia next year through "diplomatic means" as both countries prepare for President-elect Donald Trump's return to the White House.

In an interview with the Ukrainian media outlet Suspilne, Zelenskyy said he is certain that the war will end "sooner" than it otherwise would have once Mr. Trump becomes president.

The prospect of Trump returning to power in the United States next year has raised questions about the future of the conflict, as the Republican has been critical of U.S. military aid to Kyiv.

Zelenskyy said that Ukraine "must do everything so that this war ends next year, ends through diplomatic means."

Archive link

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Good news. Hopefully the bloodshed can be ended as soon as possible.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Alsephina@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So it looks like it's finally happening?

[–] chillBurner@lemmy.ml 40 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The best time to take ceasefire was before.

The second best time is now

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 25 points 1 week ago

And they're still going for the second worst option: later

(The worst option would be never)

If they know they're going to end the war diplomatically, why are they delaying? Extremely cruel to the people fighting today who know their deaths are meaningless, that they're only dying cause it's still early.

[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 23 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

zelensky-navi I want to end the war diplomatically, but only next year. Sorry, but some of our people need to die until I do what I already decided to do

It comes as German chancellor Olaf Scholz spoke with Mr Putin for the first time in nearly two years.

The German leader urged Mr Putin to pull his forces out of Ukraine and begin talks with Kyiv that would open the way for a “just and lasting peace”, the German government said.

The move was swiftly criticised by Mr Zelensky, who said the call had opened a “Pandora’s box” by undermining efforts to isolate the Russian leader.

“Now there may be other conversations, other calls. Just a lot of words,” said Mr Zelensky in his evening address on Friday. “And this is exactly what Putin has long wanted: it is extremely important for him to weaken his isolation and to conduct ordinary negotiations.”

zelensky-pain Diplomacy in 2024 is bad actually. Only next year!

Truly the hero of our time.

[–] ShareMySims@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 week ago (19 children)

The idea that it is possible to "diplomacy" your way out of conflict with a dictator is so absurd I want to laugh my ass off, but unfortunately it isn't funny at all.

Putin will happily send every last Russian in to the meat grinder before he accept defeat, and now that he has his American buddy back in place, now with added musk funds, it is seriously delusional to think the situation is going to do anything other than escalate.

Zelenskyy is being beyond naive at best (I honestly don't believe he believes in what he's saying).

[–] sparky@lemmy.federate.cc 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don’t think he’s being naive, he knows Trump is going to hang him out to dry, and he can’t win without ongoing US support. So if he’s come to the conclusion that defeat is inevitable, or at least that victory is impossible, then it makes sense to start posturing to that effect, to try to get the best outcome possible later at the negotiating table.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 week ago

How to say you're historically illiterate without saying you're historically illiterate. 👆

[–] Subverb@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's responding to his talks with Trump. He knows US support is going to fade fast under the new guy. He's trying to save his country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krolden@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 week ago (19 children)

Wtf is with you people claiming you know what's best for these countries? Its like you're larping as the us state dept.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BurgerPunk@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

Zelenskyyyyyy Russian asset confirmed

[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The US won't allow it, the same way they didn't allow it the previous times.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The US is clearly starting to distance itself from project Ukraine now. That said, I don't expect that the US will alter its stance to simply admit that Russia has won. The most probable scenario is that Russia and the US will secretly negotiate a behind-the-scenes agreement, and the US will just cut aid to Ukraine while continuing to publicly engage in verbal posturing. The US admin will say that it has more pressing concerns with China and the Middle East, and it's now time for Europe to step up and assume a larger role. However, everyone knows that Europe is not any position to do so. Therefore, the conflict will likely end on Russian terms without the US openly admitting defeat. As an added bonus, the US will secure lucrative military contracts with European nations for decades to come.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

lmao the war in ukraine really was just a Democrat political project

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 week ago

And their response to the genocide and pogroms in Palestine proved their hypocrisy.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 week ago

Well no, this has been a bipartisan project stretching back decades. Brzezinski Mapped Out the Battle for Ukraine in 1997

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i wonder if it was an american military industrial complex fueled excuse to create a new profit stream in a new proxy war between russia and nato.

ukraine is perfect because the russians will never give them up for a myriad of reasons and that guarantees that american military contractors will be able to milk profits from ukraine as a proxy battleground country for as long as both russia and the united states exist; longer than any of us here today.

[–] Hexadecimalkink@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The sanctions applied by the west have been the best thing that could have happened to the Russian economy in decades. Their import substitution policy accelerated and even after the war they will now have competitive industries that wouldn't have been considered economically viable had Russia continued to buy cheaper goods from the west. I sometimes think the continuation of the war is collusion by the US and Russia to keep both of their economies doing great at the expense of Europe, who are too busy with their hubris to realise they're getting screwed here.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

i wonder how much of that economic progress will remain after the ukranian war.

[–] AmericaDelendaEst@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago

It turns out actually making things is an important part of the economy and i don't think their increasing manufacturing capacity is going anywhere. And if the sanctions end it's even easier to keep making oil money

[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Russian ruling class would need to disabuse themselves of neoliberal dogmas

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

in that case: i wonder how much "soviet union" is still lives in russia and whether or not there's enough to keep the economic progress from vanishing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kieselguhr@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

and the EU vassals went with it blindly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Korkki@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What he likely means "ending the war by diplomatic means" is not talking or negotiating with Russia. No, that would be worst heresy imaginable. When he has previously talked about the use of diplomacy to find peace, what he really means is for Ukraine redouble it's efforts to beg for more money and weapons, but also get US and Europe to put more pressure on countries like China and India to ditch Putin and support Ukraine instead. Zelensky has talked along these lines before. Make his position seem reasonable to those who who want Ukraine to seek settlement, when it really isn't any different from "Zelensky's peace plan" that can be summed up in demand Russia's unconditional surrender as a precondition to any kind of dialogue.

I fear it's this kinda crazy talk that we are looking at. Zelensky or his inner circle just bring themselves to talk to the Russians, nor can they talk about things like giving up even places like Crimea. They just can't give an inch and we all know what happens to the reeds that don't bend with wind.

[–] _pi@lemmy.ml 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Zelenskyy literally cannot advocate for negotiated peace. The Right wing nationalist elements of Ukraine's coalition will effectively murder him if that becomes his position. It remains to be seen what will happen to him when he's forced into it by the reality of the war and the waning of international support by his patron states.

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 week ago (11 children)

He's likely just going to flee to US or UK in the end.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago

He has a mega mansion in Egypt in his mom's name thanks to this war.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They absolutely can. Easily. They made a peace deal shortly after war started, but Zelensky accepted weapons bribe promises to keep going instead. As they are nearing the last Ukrainian, and the bribes will dry up, something close to original deal will happen instead. Zelensky is dead either way, but peace lets him flee somewhere, and claim to have done the right thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›