this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
87 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5276 readers
647 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
87
Shell’s legal victory is disappointing – but this is not the end for corporate climate litigation (theconversation.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Joker@sh.itjust.works to c/climate@slrpnk.net
4 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boomkop3@reddthat.com 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Stupidly enough, one of the arguments used to deny this claim here
"if we don't sell it, others will so it doesn't help"
...so there's no point in reducing these sales

Was just used to justify the opposite when ruling about piracy
"if they we can't offer pirated content, then everyone will"
...so they also banned a bunch of other stuff and can add to the list later

[–] BestBouclettes@jlai.lu 6 points 1 week ago

But you see, it's different because... Reasons.

[–] SolacefromSilence@fedia.io 6 points 1 week ago

It's all politically motivated judges who try to appear above the fray, but they're not. It's an inherently political position as a judge and we'd be better off seeing things how they are.

My moment was looking back to how the federal government passed a law to strip highway funding if states didn't raise their drinking age to 21. The same logic was used to force states to expand the ACA in each state, where other federal medical funding would be cut if states didn't take advantage of the ACA in their state. Ooopsies, as we know now, Republican judges struck that down and we have a half-baked medical solution. It's still better than before though, albeit hobbled.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Litigation has failed.

Like trump they will run out the clock.

I hear gasoline is flammable.