this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
494 points (99.2% liked)

United Kingdom

4068 readers
660 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gila@lemm.ee 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The disposable black market & associated disproportionate rise in youth vaping in Australia results from the illegality of all vapes, not just disposables. It's hard to imagine it becoming a burgeoning black market predicated solely on that vapers find the highly available, better value, relatively environmentally friendly option untenable. Overall a sensible move I think coming from a pro-vape perspective

[–] Cycadophyta@lemmy.cafe 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

What was the rationale for banning all vapes in Australia? Seems excessive. Are cigarettes banned too?

[–] gila@lemm.ee 28 points 1 day ago

To address youth vaping. The outcome of that has been that youth vaping is significantly higher than in other OECD member countries, and kids are now getting them from the 'vape dealer' whom may have other illicit drugs available. Cigarettes aren't banned, only made unaffordable via progressive excise tax. That's had its own unintended consequences of launching a new market for "chop chop" i.e. illegally grown unprocessed tobacco, as well as black market imports that sidestep the plain packaging laws, and tobacco gang wars in Sydney and Melbourne.

[–] VoldemortsHorcrux@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Tobacco companies weren't making money off them, no juul equivalent here, nothing from Marlboro/Phillip Morris ECT. Big lobbies to push the government. A year past the ban on vapes and I can still find them everywhere.... Except from the doctors and pharmacies that are meant to be selling legal replacements.

[–] emmanuel_car@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago

Cigarettes and tobacco products are highly taxed. Why they didn’t go down that route I’ll never understand.

[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Based.

Should've been done years ago.

[–] MashedHobbits@lemy.lol 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah there’s only really benefits to this.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But not disposable lighters?

[–] UmeU@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lighters last a super long time and they don’t contain batteries which is the real concern.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Lighters last a super long time

flashbacks to last 4th of July where we needed to get 4 different disposable lighters before one worked
Not that the actual lighters are any better, those dry out on their own with no use.

[–] UmeU@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hate to be a shill, but were they of the Bic brand or were they shitty knock offs?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UrbonMaximus@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've never seen a "disposable" lighter that didn't have a gas filling hole.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (3 children)

went to my junk drawer and got one, Doesn't have anything on the bottom and top won't come off without breaking

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago

You can actually remove it pretty easily. I recall because I removed that shiny metal bit so I could follow a life hack video that allows you to increase the flame size. I'm sure you could take it off and refill it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpruceBringsteen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

People should be boofing nicotine pouches like God intended anyhow.

[–] snaprails@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Yeah, good luck with that. Nobody is regulating any of it so the rules might as well be advisory only.

Seemingly every dodgy corner shop sells high strength disposable vapes already, so I don't know why they'd stop because of this...

[–] lazynooblet@lazysoci.al 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In the same fashion that cigarettes are no longer on display in stores this will absolutely have an effect. The supply chain will eventually evaporate so once stores are out of stock it'll no longer be common place. Sure, they could be imported but stores that don't comply won't be common and will stick out easily.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 4 points 1 day ago

I don't think cigarettes being out of view lead to their decrease, nor all the warnings or pictures of diseases. It's more that they cost about £15 a pack. Honestly feels like weed has already overtaken cigarettes.

I know they mean well, and disposables are spectacularly wasteful, but I can also see the appeal of a cheap, no maintenance, no mess, no faff vape.

And from a purely selfish point of view, I'd rather smell Fruit Salad smelling vapes everywhere than cigarettes or more bloody weed.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 day ago

Right and how are they going to get new stock exactly? When they ban something they ban the import of them as well not just the sale.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›