this post was submitted on 09 Oct 2024
209 points (95.6% liked)

Futurology

1731 readers
130 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

Sounds biased.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 101 points 1 week ago (12 children)

They're not making the point that "all civilizations will end because of this". The more interesting and credible point they're making is that 1,000 years of energy consumption growth rates at our speed must inevitably, even using 100% renewables, cook the planet. They're not saying "we can't beat climate change under any circumstances", they're saying (if I have understood them) that the way to do it is at least some amount of degrowth, which is quite reasonable.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I wonder how much energy we can get in a space station by having water carry waste heat to the power plant? Or if that would just cook the station?

[–] WldFyre@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›